The purpose of this study is twofold: first, to delve into professional development (PD) of science teachers’ views about nature of science (NOS) throughout activities linking NOS aspects to science centers (SCs), and second, to reveal how a science teacher uses NOS aspects while teaching in SCs. An instrumental qualitative case study method with different data sources was used. There were 18 elementary science teachers participating voluntarily in this study. Additionally, one science teacher among the participants was observed two times during her SCs visit with her grade 6th and 7th students. Researchers trained science teachers for using the facilities of SCs and supported their understanding of NOS. Before and after the workshop, open-ended VNOS-C questionnaire was administered, and follow-up interviews were conducted. Observations in SCs were made to check whether the teacher were able to use NOS concepts while teaching science. Findings revealed that the majority of science teachers exhibited improved views about NOS, and improvement was attained particularly on the aspects of tentativeness, methods of scientific investigation, social and cultural embeddedness, and creativity and imagination, while the least improvement was noted for scientific theories and laws. During the SC visits, the teacher employed all aspects of NOS except the theory and law tenet and mostly discuss about the observation, inference, and experiment while teaching. Further PD activities are suggested to support teachers to develop their own teaching plans specific to each exhibit by employing NOS concepts for teaching with/in SCs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). The influence of history of science courses on students' conceptions of the nature of science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Oregon.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: the impact of philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 15–41.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 353–374.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000b). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436.
Akerson, V. L., & Donnelly, L. A. (2008). Relationships among learner characteristics and preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174702.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317.
Akerson, V. L., Cullen, T. A., & Hanson, D. L. (2009). Fostering a community of practice through a professional development program to improve elementary teachers’ views of nature of science and teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1090–1113.
Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95, 518–542.
Allchin, D., Anderson, H. M., & Nielson, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practices. Science Education, 98, 461–486.
Anderson, D., & Zhang, Z. (2003). Teacher perceptions of field-trip planning and implementation. Visitor Studies Today, 6(3), 6–11.
Astor-Jack, T., McCallie, E., & Balcerzak, P. (2007). Academic and informal science education practitioner views about professional development in science education. Science Education, 91(4), 604–628.
Aydın, S., Demirdöğen, B., Muslu, N., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2013). Professional journals as a source of PCK for teaching nature of science: an examination of articles published in the science teacher (an NSTA journal) 1996–2010. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 977–997.
Banilower, E. R., Heck, D. J., & Weiss, I. R. (2007). Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the National Science Foundation’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 375–395.
Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85(4), 426–453.
Birman, B., Desimone, G. M., & Porter, A. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28–33.
Burgin, S. R., & Sadler, T. D. (2016). Learning nature of science concepts through a research apprenticeship program: a comparative study of three approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 31–59.
Cakmakcı, G. (2012). Promoting student teachers’ ideas about nature of science through educational research apprenticeship. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 114–135.
Chang, Y. H., Chang, C. Y., & Tseng, Y. H. (2010). Trends of science education research: an automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9202-2.
Cigdemoglu, C., & Köseoğlu, F. (2019). Improving science teachers’ views about scientific inquiry: reflections from a professional development program aiming to advance science centre-school curricula integration. Science Education, 28(3–5), 439–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00054-0.
Dawson, E. (2014). “Not designed for us”: how science museums and science centers socially exclude low-income, minority ethnic groups. Science Education, 98(6), 981–1008.
Demirdöğen, B., Hanuscin, D. L., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., & Köseoğlu, F. (2016). Development and nature of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science. Research in Science Education, 46(4), 575–612.
Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Duschl, R., & Grandy, R. (2011). Demarcation in science education: toward an enhanced view of scientific method. In R. Taylor & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Epistemology and science education: Understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy (pp. 3–19). New York: Routledge.
Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.
Eren-Sisman, E. N., & Koseoglu, F. (2019). Designing a magic flask: a new activity for teaching nature of science in both formal and informal learning environments. Science Activities, 56(3), 108–118.
European Network of Science Centers and Museums [ECSITE] (2008). The impact of science & discovery centers: a review of worldwide studies. Retrieved from https://www.sciencecentres.org.uk/resources/science-centres-worldwide/impact-science-discovery-centres-review-worldwide-studies/
Falk, J. H., & Needham, M. D. (2011). Measuring the impact of a science center on its community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20394.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Gaible, E., & Burns, M. (2005). Models and best practices in teacher professional development. In Using technology to train teachers: appropriate uses of ICT for teacher professional development in developing countries (pp. 15–24). Washington, DC: infoDev/World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.294.html
Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Analysis of a national sample of teachers. American Education Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
Garnett, R. (2001). The impact of science centers/museums on their surrounding communities: summary report. Retrieved from www.astc.org/resource/case/Impact_Study02.pdf
Gascoigne, T., & Metcalfe, J. (2001). Report: The evaluation of national programs of science awareness. Science Communication, 23, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001023001007.
Guerra-Ramos, M. T., Ryder, J., & Leach, J. (2010). Ideas about the nature of science in pedagogically relevant contexts: insights from a situated perspective of primary teachers’ knowledge. Science Education, 94, 282–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20361.
Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science. Science & Education, 20, 591–607.
Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.
Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395–418.
Kim, S. Y., & Irving, K. E. (2010). History of science as an instructional context: student learning in genetics and nature of science. Science & Education, 19, 187–215.
Kisiel, J. (2005). Understanding elementary teacher motivations for science fieldtrips. Science Education, 89(6), 936–955.
Koseoglu, F., Tahancalıo, S., Kanlı, U. & Ozdem-Yılmaz, Y. (2020). Investigation of science teachers’ professional development needs for learning in science centers. Education and Science. Early Release, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8725.
Küçük, M. (2006). Bilimin Doğasını İlköğretim 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerine Öğretmeye Yönelik Bir Çalışma (A study toward teaching the nature of science for seventh grade primary students (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Leblebicioğlu, G., Metin, D., Yardımcı, E., & Berkyürek, I. (2011). Teaching the nature of science in the nature: a summer science camp. Elementary Education Online, 10(3), 1037–1055.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: past, present and future. In S. A. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 83–126). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bell, R. L. (2001). Preservice teachers’ understanding and teaching of the nature of science: an intervention study. The Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 1(2), 135–160.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.
Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: the state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: from nature of science to features of science. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht: Springer.
McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 53–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McDonald, C.V. (2008). Exploring the influence of a science content course incorporating explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Center for Learning Innovation, Queensland University of Technology.
McDonald, C. V. (2010). The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1137–1164 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20377.
Melber, L. M., & Cox-Petersen, A. M. (2005). Teacher professional development and informal learning environments: investigating partnerships and possibilities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 95–102.
Monteiro, B. A. P., Martins, I., de Souza Janerine, A., & de Carvalho, F. C. (2016). The issue of the arrangement of new environments for science education through collaborative actions between schools, museums and science centres in the Brazilian context of teacher training. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 419–437.
Morrison, J. A., Raab, F., & Ingram, D. (2009). Factors influencing elementary and secondary teachers’ views on the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 384–403.
Mundry, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1999). Designing professional development for science and mathematics teachers: decision points and dilemmas. National Institute for Science Education (NISE) Brief, 3(1), 1–7.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2015). Science teachers' learning: enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 10.17226/21836. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/21836
National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National Science Education Standards (p. 10.17226/4962). Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits (p. 10.17226/12190). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Teachers Association [NSTA]. (1998). An NSTA position statement: informal science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 28(1), 17–18.
Neresini, F., Dimopoulos, K., Kallfass, M., & Peters, H. P. (2009). Exploring a black box: cross national study of visit effects on visitors to large physics research centers in Europe. Science Communication, 30(4), 506–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009332650.
Ozturk, A., & Başbay, A. (2017). The effects of curricula at Mevlana Public and Science Center on students’ science process skills and attitudes toward science. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(1), 283–298.
Pecore, J. L., Kirchgessner, M. L., & Carruth, L. L. (2013). Changes in science content knowledge and attitudes toward science teaching of educators attending a zoo-based neuroscience professional development. The Clearing House, 86(6), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2013.826527.
Pedretti, E. (2002). T. Kuhn meets T. rex: critical conversations and new directions in science centres and museums. Studies in Science Education, 37, 1–42.
Persson, P. E. (2000). The changing science center: sustaining our mission into the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.astc.org/pubs/dimensions/2000/jan-feb/changing.htm
Pompea, S., & Hawkins, I. (2002). Increasing science literacy in optics and photonics trough science centers, museums, and web-based exhibits. Seventh international conference on education and training in optics and photonics (pp. 554–560). OSA and SPIE.
Porter, A. C., & Brophy, J. E. (1988). Good teaching: insights from the work of the Institute for Research on Teaching. Educational Leadership, 45(8), 75–84.
Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2008). Meaningful citizen engagement in science and technology: what would it really take? Science Communication, 30, 126–136.
Price, S., & Hein, G. E. (1991). More than a fieldtrip: science programmes for elementary school groups at museums. International Journal of Science Education, 13(5), 505–519.
Quin, M. (1990). What is hands-on science, and where can I find? Physics Education, 25, 258–262.
Rennie, L. J., & McClafferty, T. P. (1995). Using visits to interactive science and technology centres, museums, aquaria, and zoos to promote learning in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6(4), 175–185.
Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: a critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235–256.
Salmi, H. (2003). Science centers as learning laboratories: experiences of Heureka, the Finnish Science Centre. International Journal of Technology Management, 25(5), 460–476.
Sassos, I. (2014). The role of informal science centers in science education: attitudes, skills, and self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 4(3), 167–180.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: an explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645.
Sentürk, E., & Ozdemir, Ö. F. (2014). The effect of science centers on students’ attitudes towards science. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 4(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2012.726754.
Sinclair, B. B., Naizer, G., & Ledbetter, C. (2011). Observed implementation of a science professional development program for K–8 classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 579–594.
Smith, W. S., McLaughlin, E., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1998). Effect on primary level students of in-service teacher education in an informal science setting. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(2), 123–142.
Sunar, S. & Geban, O. (2011). Turkish pre-service science teachers’ views on science-technology-society issue. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, January (Special issue), 9-24.
Taber, K. S. (2014). Methodological issues in science education research: a perspective from the philosophy of science. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 1839–1893). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
van Dijck, J. (2003). After the “two cultures”: toward a “(multi) cultural” practice of science communication. Science Communication, 25(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547003259540.
Wahbeh, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 425–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.786852.
Walton, R. (2000). Heidegger in the hands-on science and technology center: philosophical reflections on learning in ınformal settings. Journal of Technology Education, 12(1), 49–60.
Watson, S., Dodd, J., & Jones, C. (2007). Engage, learn, achieve: the impact of museum visits on the attainment of secondary pupils in the East of England 2006–2007. University of Leicester, Research Centre for Museums and Galleries: MLA East of England & Renaissance East of England. Retrieved from https://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/museumstudies/rcmg/projects/engage-learn-achieve/ELA%20full%20report.pdf
Weitze, M. (2003). Science centers: examples from the U.S. and from Germany. Paper presented at the conference ‘from the itinerant lecturers of the 18th century to popularizing physics for the 21st century’, June 1–6, in Pognana sul Lario, Italy.
Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse’s mouth: what scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93(1), 109–130.
This study is based upon work supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, 1001-Scientific and Technological Research Project Support Program under Grant 114K646 entitled “BİLMER Project: A Teacher and Explainer Professional Development Model to Increase the Effectiveness of Science Centres in Science and Society Communication and Science Education.”
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Eren-Şişman, E.N., Çiğdemoğlu, C., Kanlı, U. et al. Science Teachers’ Professional Development about Science Centers. Sci & Educ (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00136-4