Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Case for Natural History

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fundamental knowledge of natural history is lacking in many western societies, as demonstrated by its absence in school science curricula. And yet, to meet local and global challenges such as environmental degradation, biodiversity loss and climate change, we need to better understand the living and non-living parts of the natural world. Many have argued passionately for an increased understanding of natural history; others have developed successful pedagogical programmes for applying knowledge of natural history in environmental initiatives. In joining wider calls, we choose here to focus on the educational value afforded by understanding the epistemological bases of natural history and its particular forms of reasoning. We also briefly discuss the ways in which an education in natural history provides the foundation for environmental and social justice efforts that directly affect the lives of young people and their communities. We end by highlighting the ease by which natural history may be incorporated in learning opportunities both in and outside of the classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achiam, M., Simony, L., & Lindow, B. E. K. (2016). Objects prompt authentic scientific activities among learners in a museum programme. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 1012–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsop, S., & Bencze, L. (2012). In search of activist pedagogies in SMTE. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, 12(4), 394–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amos, R., & Reiss, M. J. (2012). The benefits of residential fieldwork for school science: insights from a five-year initiative for inner-city students in the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 485–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. J. (2003). Too much natural history, or too little? Animal Behaviour, 65(6), 1065–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschbacher, P. R., Ing, M., & Tsai, S. M. (2014). Is science me? Exploring middle school students’ STEM career aspirations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 735–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, R., & Ellenbogen, K. M. (2002). Placing objects within disciplinary perspectives: examples from history and science. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp. 153–169). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A., Clegg, L., Coulson, T., & Taylor, J. (2002). Why conservationists should heed Pokémon. Science, 295(5564), 2367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, G. A. (1986). The role of natural history in contemporary biology. Bioscience, 36(5), 324–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students’ research-informed socioscientific activism: Re/visions for a sustainable future. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, A. (2013). Thomas Kuhn. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/thomas-kuhn/ on January 3, 2016.

  • Blachowicz, J. (2009). How science textbooks treat scientific method: a philosopher’s perspective. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(2), 303–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R. N. (1994). Theory and experiment in evolutionary biology. Synthese, 99(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin’: agency, identity and learning in a green energy program. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H. B., Huffling, L. D., Tomasek, T., Hegedus, T. A., Matthews, C.-E., Allen, M. H., & Ash, M. C. (2015). ‘unthinkable’ selves: identity boundary work in a summer field ecology enrichment program for diverse youth. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1524–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. C. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited. A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, A., & Dzemski, G. (2007). Reconstruction of the cervical skeleton posture of Brachiosaurus brancai Janensch, 1914 by an analysis of the intervertebral stress along the neck and a comparison with the results of different approaches. Fossil Record, 10, 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. E. (2002). Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science, 69(3), 447–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. E. (2011). Prediction and explanation in historical natural science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62(3), 551–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conniff, R. (2016). Our natural history, endangered. In The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com.

  • Coskie, T., Hornof, M., & Trudel, H. (2007). A natural integration. Science and Children, 44, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp, A. (2008). Knowing me know you: building valuable relationships outside the classroom. Education, 26(2), 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., Barron, B. J., Knutson, K., & Martin, C. (2015). Interest and the development of pathways to science. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning and related activity. Washington, DC: AERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daeschler, E. B., Shubin, N. H., & Jenkins, F. A. (2006). A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan. Nature, 440(7085), 757–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dansgaard, W., Johnsen, S. J., Clausen, H. B., Dahl-Jensen, D., Gundestrup, N. S., Hammer, C. U., et al. (1993). Evidence for general instability of past climate from a 250-kyr ice-core record. Nature, 364(6434), 218–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P., Sanders, D. L., & Amos, R. (2015). Learning in cultivated gardens and other outdoor landscapes. In C. J. Boulter, M. J. Reiss, & D. L. Sanders (Eds.), Darwin-inspired learning (pp. 47–48). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P. (2003). The importance of the natural sciences to conservation. The American Naturalist, 162(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J., & Dickie, I. (2012). Learning in the natural environment: review of social and economic benefits and barriers. Natural England Commissioned Reports, Number 092. Natural England.

  • Douglas, J. A., & Katz, C. (2009). It’s all happening at the zoo: children’s environmental learning after school. Afterschool Matters, 8, 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2005). From living to virtual: learning from museum objects. Curator, 48(3), 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. A. (2001). The demise of fieldwork as an integral part of science education in United Kingdom schools: a victim of cultural change and political pressure? Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 9(1), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischner, T. L. (2005). Natural history and the deep roots of resource management. Natural Resources Journal, 45, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischner, T. L. (2011). Why natural history matters. The Journal of Natural History Education and Experience, 5, 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forber, P., & Griffith, E. (2011). Historical reconstruction: gaining epistemic access to the deep past. Philosophy & Theory in Biology, 3, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frøyland, M., Remmen, K. B., & Sørvik, G. O. (2016). Name-dropping or understanding?: teaching to observe geologically. Science Education, 100(5), 923–951.

  • Futuyma, D. J. (1998). Wherefore and whither the naturalist? The American Naturalist, 151(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandy, R. E., & Duschl, R. A. (2005). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: analysis of a conference. Paper presented at the International History and Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching Group Meeting, Leeds, UK, July 15–18.

  • Gray, R. (2014). The distinction between experimental and historical sciences as a framework for improving classroom inquiry. Science Education, 98(2), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., & Kang, N.-H. (2014). The structure of scientific arguments by secondary science teachers: comparison of experimental and historical science topics. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, H. W. (1994). Systematics and natural history, foundations for understanding and conserving biodiversity. American Zoologist, 34(1), 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, H. W. (2005). Organisms in nature as a central focus for biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(1), 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, H. W., & Losos, J. B. (1988). Systematics, natural history, and conservation: field biologists must fight a public-image problem. Bioscience, 38(7), 458–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: a critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyllenpalm, J., Wickman, P.-O., & Holmgren, S.-O. (2009). Teachers’ language on scientific inquiry: methods of teaching or methods of inquiry? International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1151–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfpenny, J. C., & Ozanne, R. (1989). Winter: an ecological handbook. Boulder: Johnson Books.

  • Hamlin, M. L. (2013). “Yo soy indígena”: identifying and using traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) to make the teaching of science culturally responsive for Maya girls. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(4), 759–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampp, C., & Schwan, S. (2015). The role of authentic objects in museums of the history of science and technology: findings from a visitor study. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 5(2), 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science. Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, D. C. (2004). A natural history of place in education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T. H. (1868). Remarks upon Archaeopteryx lithographica. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 16, 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, C. (2015). The endangered dead. Nature, 518(7539), 292–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, H. (2009). Supporting natural history inquiry in an informal setting: a study of museum explainer practice. Unpublished PhD thesis, King’s College London.

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Towards a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Education Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E. (2010). Basic inferences of scientific reasoning, argumentation, and discovery. Science Education, 94, 336–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. (2002). The triple helix: gene, organism, environment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorsbach, A., & Jinks, J. (2013). What early 20th century nature study can teach us. Journal of Natural History Education and Experience, 7, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louv, R. (2006). Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K., & Waite, S. (2016). Student outcomes and natural schooling. Plymouth: Plymouth University. Available online: http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/research/oelres-net.

  • Marandino, M., Achiam, M., & Oliveira, A. D. (2015). The diorama as a means for biodiversity education. In S. D. Tunnicliffe & A. Scheersoi (Eds.), Natural history dioramas—history, construction and educational role (pp. 251–266). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (2004). What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. R. (2005). Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(8), 430–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M. F. (2011). Analysis of the educational potential of a science museum learning environment: visitors’ experience with and understanding of an immersion exhibit. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 517–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, W. D., & Rickart, E. A. (2007). Are natural history museums telling the right story? Bioscience, 57(5), 390–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nundy, S. (1999). The fieldwork effect: the role and impact of fieldwork in the upper primary school. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 8(2), 190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A. (2006). Changing minds: the lasting impact of school trips. A study of the long-term impact of sustained relationships between schools and the National Trust via the Guardianship scheme. Retrieved from National Trust website: http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-schools-guardianships-changing_minds.pdf

  • Pergams, O. R. W., & Zaradic, P. A. (2006). Is love of nature in the U.S. becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. Journal of Environmental Management, 80, 387–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pergams, O. R. W., & Zaradic, P. A. (2008). Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 2295–2300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piranha, J. M., Aparecida Del Lama, E., & de La Corte Bacci, D. (2011). Geoparks in Brazil—strategy of geoconservation and development. Geoheritage, 3(4), 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redi, F. (1688/1909). Experiments of the generation of insects. (M. Bigelow, trans.). Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.

  • Reiss, M., Billingsley, B., Evans, E. M., Kissel, R. A., Lawrence, M., Munro, M., ... Veall, D. (2016). The contribution of natural history museums to science education. Phase 1 Planning Grant Report: Science Learning+ Programme.

  • Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: media in the lives of 8–18-year-olds. Menlo Park: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. (2005). Lifelines: life beyond the gene. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, J. L., & Stewart, J. (1998). Evolution and the nature of science: on the historical discord and its implications for education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1069–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schopf, J. W. (2000). Solution to Darwin’s dilemma: discovery of the missing Precambrian record of life. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences, 97(13), 6947–6953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvakumar, M., & Storksdieck, M. (2013). Portal to the public: museum educators collaborating with scientists to engage museum visitors with current science. Curator, 56(1), 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (2008). Children & nature: design principles for educators. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, E., & Bencze, L. (2015). Reimagining non-formal science education: a case of ecojustice-oriented citizenship education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, 15(3), 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, A. N., Evans, E. M., Frazier, B., Hazel, A., Tare, M., Gram, W., & Diamond, J. (2012). Changing museum visitors’ conceptions of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(1), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K. A., & Parrish, J. M. (1999). Neck posture and feeding habits of two Jurassic sauropod dinosaurs. Science, 284, 798–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, A. V., & Tsutsui, N. D. (2004). The value of museum collections for research and society. Bioscience, 54(1), 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, M. E., Klitz, K., & Yoshihara, K. (2012). Doing natural history. Bioscience, 62(9), 824–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2014). Methodological issues in science education research: a perspective from the philosophy of science. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1839–1893). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Taylor, M. P., Wedel, M. J., & Naish, D. (2009). Head and neck posture in sauropod dinosaurs inferred from extant animals. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 54(2), 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, J. J., Anderson, J. G. T., Bakker, J. D., Billo, T. J., Dunwiddie, P. W., et al. (2014). Natural history’s place in science and society. Bioscience, 64(4), 300–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, A. (2000). Designing teaching situations in the secondary school. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: the contribution of research (pp. 27–47). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trombulak, S. C., & Fleischner, T. L. (2007). Natural history renaissance. Journal of Natural History Education, 1, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. J., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence between science and environmental education. Science, 344(6184), 583–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D. S., & Eisner, T. (2000). The impending extinction of natural history. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 15, B24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M. (2002). The reproduction of cultural models of inquiry by pre-service teachers: an examination of thought and action. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 2002.

  • Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: what can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Communication and Society, King’s College London, Waterloo Road, London, SE1 9NH, UK

    Heather King

  2. Department of Science Education, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 3, 1350, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Marianne Achiam

Authors
  1. Heather King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marianne Achiam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne Achiam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

King, H., Achiam, M. The Case for Natural History. Sci & Educ 26, 125–139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9880-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9880-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation