The Portrayal of Industrial Melanism in American College General Biology Textbooks
The phenomenon of industrial melanism (IM) became widely acknowledged as a well-documented example of natural selection largely as a result of H.B.D. Kettlewell’s pioneering research on the subject in the early 1950s. It was quickly picked up by American biology textbooks starting in the early 1960s and became ubiquitous throughout the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. While recent research on the phenomenon broadly supports Kettlewell’s explanation of IM in the peppered moth, which in turn has strengthened this example of natural selection, textbook IM entries have actually declined in recent years in favor of other examples. In a previous paper, we drew attention to the pivotal role visual aspects played in the introduction of IM into (and its subsequent removal from) textbook accounts. The present article continues this investigation by analyzing textual passages on industrial melanism within a stratified random sample of textbooks from the 1960s to the 2000s. The fact that this example of natural selection was included by multiple publishers independently, in a short period of time, makes it uniquely qualified for a textbook study of this kind. The purpose of the present project was to determine whether these textbooks contain what has come to be known as the standard peppered moth story. Three complete series were also inspected for change across time. Our analysis focused on (1) the amount of text devoted to industrial melanism; (2) what specific science content elements were present; and (3) what, if any, nature of science (NOS) aspects were included. The study documents an increase in the amount of text devoted to industrial melanism over the decades. In spite of this increase, only modest changes in science content and NOS aspects were found.
KeywordsStratify Random Sample Word Count Bird Predation Text Passage Biology Textbook
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
- Allchin, D. K. (2002). Kettlewell’s missing evidence. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(4), 240–245.Google Scholar
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Project 2061 benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Campbell, N. A., Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Jackson, R. B. (2009). Biology (8th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings/Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
- Cengage Annual Report. (2010). www.Cengage.com/investor/annual_reports.html.
- Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1991). A quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and expository learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 939–951.Google Scholar
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young People’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Encyclopedia Dubuque. (2011). http://www.encyclopediadubuque.org/index.php?title=WILLIAM_.
- Hagen, J. (1996). H. B. D. Kettlewell & the peppered moths. In J. B. Hagen, D. K. Allchin, & F. Singer (Eds.), Doing biology (pp. 1–20). Glenview, IL: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Hooper, J. (2002). Of moths and men: An evolutionary tale. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
- Majerus, M. E. N. (1998). Melanism: Evolution in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Majerus, M. E. N. (2005). The peppered moth: Decline of a Darwinian disciple. In M. D. E. Fellowes, G. J. Holloway, & J. Rolff (Eds.), Insect evolutionary ecology (pp. 371–396). Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
- Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Matzke, N. (2004). Icon of obfuscation. The Talk Origins Archive. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/wells/iconob.html.
- McGraw-Hill Annual Report. (2011). www.mcgraw-hill.com/about/annual_report/ar2011.pdf.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Nehm, R. H., Poole, T. M., Lyford, M. E., Hoskins, S. G., Carruth, L., Ewere, B. E., & Colberg, P. J. S. (2009). Does the segregation of evolution in biology textbooks and introductory courses reinforce students’ faulty mental models of biology and evolution? Evolution Education Outreach, 2, 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS.Google Scholar
- Pearson Education Annual Report. (2005). http://ar2005.pearson.com/operating/education.html.
- Pearson Education Annual Report. (2007). http://ar2007.pearson.com/operating/education.html.
- Rudge, D. W. (2004). The mystery phenomenon: Lesson plans. In D. Metz (Ed.), Proceedings of the seventh international history, philosophy and science teaching group meeting (pp. 773–811). IHPST: Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
- Rudge, D. W., & Fulford, J. M. (2011). The role of visual imagery in textbook portrayals of industrial melanism. In F. Seroglou, V. Koulountzos & A. Siatras (Eds.), Science & culture: promise, challenge and demand, book of proceedings for the eleventh international history, philosophy & science teaching (IHPST) and sixth greek history, philosophy and science teaching joint conference, Aristotle University, 1–5 July 2011 (pp. 630–637). Thessaloniki, Greece: Epikentro Publications.Google Scholar
- Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
- Weiss, I., Banilower, E., McMahon, K., & Smith, P. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.Google Scholar