Understandings of Nature of Science and Multiple Perspective Evaluation of Science News by Non-science Majors
Understandings of nature of science (NOS) are a core component of scientific literacy, and a scientifically literate populace is expected to be able to critically evaluate science in the media. While evidence has remained inconclusive on whether better NOS understandings will lead to critical evaluation of science in the media, this study aimed at examining the correlation therein. Thirty-eight non-science majors, enrolled in a science course for non-specialists held in a local community college, evaluated three health news articles by rating the extent to which they agreed with the reported claims and providing as many justifications as possible. The majority of the participants were able to evaluate and justify their viewpoint from multiple perspectives. Students’ evaluation was compared with their NOS conceptions, including the social and cultural embedded NOS, the tentative NOS, the peer review process and the community of practice. Results indicated that participants’ understanding of the tentative NOS was significantly correlated with multiple perspective evaluation of science news reports of socioscientific nature (r = 0.434, p < 0.05). This moderate correlation suggested the association between understanding of the tentative NOS and multiple perspective evaluation of science in the media of socioscientific nature. However, the null result for other target NOS aspects in this study suggested a lack of evidence to assume that understanding the social dimensions of science would have significant influence on the evaluation of science in the media. Future research on identifying the reasons for why and why not NOS understandings are applied in the evaluation will move this field forward.
KeywordsScience Education Social Dimension Multiple Perspective News Article Peer Review Process
- ACARA. (2009). Shape of the Australian curriculum: Science. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/australian_curriculum_-_science.pdf. Accessed September 21, 2014.
- Achieve, Inc. (2012). Next generation science standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/. Accessed June 14, 2014.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–437.Google Scholar
- American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Boersema, D. (1998). The use of real and imaginary cases in communicating the nature of science. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 255–266). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- CDC & HKEAA [Curriculum Development Council & Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority]. (2007, with updates in January 2014). Science education key learning area: Integrated science curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4–6). Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/kla/science-edu/IS_C&A_Guide_updated_e.pdf. Accessed September 21, 2014.
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Fuller, S. (1998). Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Gregory, J., & Millar, S. (1998). Science in public: Communication, culture and credibility. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Harding, A. (2009, February 2). Cutting calories may boost your memory. Cable News Network. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/01/26/health.calories.memory/. Accessed June 14, 2014.
- Jarman, R., McClune, B., Pyle, E., & Braband, G. (2012). The critical reading of the images associated with science-related news reports: Establishing a knowledge, skills, and attitudes framework. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 2(2), 103–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Khan, U. (2008, July 5). Tofu ‘might harm memory in elderly’. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2249859/Tofu-might-harm-memory-in-elderly.html. Accessed June 14, 2014.
- Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology. The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education. (2012). New Zealand Curriculum Guides Senior Secondary—Science. Retrieved from http://seniorsecondary.tki.org.nz/Science/What-is-science-about. Accessed September 21, 2014.
- National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N., & Lederman, N. (2008, March). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: The VOSI Questionnaire. Paper presented at the international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Baltimore, MD. March 30–April 2, 2008.Google Scholar
- The Associated Press. (2008, July 24). Head of US cancer institute warns of cellphone risks. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/head-of-u-s-cancer-institute-warns-of-cellphone-risks-1.724536. Accessed June 14, 2014.
- Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wellington, J. (1993). Using newspapers in science education. School Science Review, 74(268), 47–52.Google Scholar