Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 1527–1534 | Cite as

Psycho-neural Identity as the Basis for Empirical Research and Theorization in Psychology: An Interview with Mario A. Bunge

  • Javier Virues-Ortega
  • Camilo Hurtado-Parrado
  • Toby L. Martin
  • Flávia Julio
Article

Abstract

Mario Bunge is one of the most prolific philosophers of our time. Over the past sixty years he has written extensively about semantics, ontology, epistemology, philosophy of science and ethics. Bunge has been interested in the philosophical and methodological implications of modern psychology and more specifically in the philosophies of the relation between the neural and psychological realms. According to Bunge, functionalism, the philosophical stand of current psychology, has limited explanatory power in that neural processes are not explicitly acknowledged as components or factors of psychological phenomena. In Matter and Mind (2010), Bunge has elaborated in great detail the philosophies of the mind-brain dilemma and the basis of the psychoneural identity hypothesis, which suggests that all psychological processes can be analysed in terms of neural and physical phenomena. This article is the result of a long interview with Dr. Bunge on psychoneural identity and brain-behaviour relations.

References

  1. Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Broca, P. (1861). Remarques sur le siege de la faculté du langage articulé, suvies d’une observation d’aphémie (perte de la parole) [Remarks on the seat of the faculty of articulated language, following an observation of aphemia]. Bulletin de la Société Anatomique, 6, 330–357. Retrieved from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Broca/aphemie.htm.
  3. Bunge, M. (1967). Foundations of Physics. Berlin, Heidelberg, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunge, M. (1974–1989). Treatise on basic philosophy (Vols. 1–8). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Bunge, M. (1980). The mind-body problem. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  6. Bunge, M. (2010). Matter and mind: A philosophical inquiry. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Bunge, M., & Ardila R. (2002). Filosofía de la psicología [Philosophy of psychology] (2nd edn.). Mexico D. F.: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  8. Fleming, S. M., Weil, R. S., Nagy, Z., Dolan, R. J., & Rees, G. (2010). Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science, 329, 1541–1543. doi: 10.1126/science.1191883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Helmholtz, H. (1853). Über einige Gesetze der Vertheilung elektrischer Ströme in körperlichen Leitern mit Anwendung auf die thierisch-elektrischen Versuche [Some laws concerning the distribution of electrical currents in conductors with applications to experiments on animal electricity]. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 89, 211–233. Retrieved from http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k151746.image.f225.langFR.
  11. Huffman, C. (2008). Alcmaeon. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2008 ed). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/alcmaeon/.
  12. Hunt, G. R., & Gray, R. D. (2004). Direct observations of pandanus-tool manufacture and use by a New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides). Animal Cognition, 7, 114–120. doi: 10.1007/s10071-003-0200-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hurtado-Parrado, C., Virues-Ortega, J., Martin, T. L., & Julio, F. (2011). Causes of behavioral processes: An interview with Mario A. Bunge. Universitas Psychologica, 10, 967–974.Google Scholar
  14. James, W. (1880). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
  15. James, W. (1882). Subjective effects of nitrous oxide. Mind, 7, 186–208.Google Scholar
  16. Kim, J. (1996). Philosophy of mind. Oxford: West View Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kuper, H., & Marmot, M. (2003). Job strain, job demands, decision latitude, and risk of coronary heart disease within the Whitehall II study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 147–153. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.2.147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marmot, M. G., Rose, G., Shipley, M., & Hamilton, P. J. (1978). Employment grade and coronary heart disease in British civil servants. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 32, 244–249. doi: 10.1136/jech.32.4.244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin, U., Martin, H., & Lindauer, M. (1978). Transplantation of a time-signal in honey bees. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 124, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sidman, M. (1978). Remarks. Behaviorism, 6, 265–268.Google Scholar
  21. Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193–216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wernicke, C. (1970). The aphasic symptom-complex: A psychological study on an anatomical basis. Archives of Neurology, 22, 280–282. (Original work published in 1874).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier Virues-Ortega
    • 1
    • 2
  • Camilo Hurtado-Parrado
    • 1
  • Toby L. Martin
    • 2
  • Flávia Julio
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.St. Amant Research CentreWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations