Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 33–53 | Cite as

Global Climate Change: What has Science Education Got to Do with it?

  • Ajay Sharma
Article

Abstract

Despite a near universal consensus among scientists regarding the perils of climate change for human civilizations, climate change has not emerged as a key issue among science educators. This position paper advocates for the centrality of climate change in science education. Using Polanyi’s critique of market in capitalist societies, it positions global climate change as an outcome of commodification of nature in market dominated societies. Thus, the paper argues that global climate change is primarily a societal issue that needs a societal response much more than a technological one. Further, it presents a case for considering science education as an important element of societal response to global climate change. In the end, the paper presents some ideas for re-imagining science education for the global climate change era.

Keywords

Science Education Sustainability Science Capitalist Society National Science Education Standard Socioscientific Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Denise Glynn, Cory Buxton and Irfan Muzaffar for their critical comments and inputs on different version of this paper.

References

  1. Bakker, K. (2005). Neoliberalizing nature? market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(3), 542–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borenstein, S. (2009). Obama considers climate engineering to cool globe. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/globalwarming/2009-04-08-obama-climate-engineering_N.htm.
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1987). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brahic, C. (2005). US confirms belief in ‘technical fix’ to climate change. Science and Development Network. Retrieved from http://www.scidev.net/en/news/us-confirms-belief-in-technical-fix-to-climate-c.html.
  6. Bridges, D. (2008). Educationalization: On the appropriateness of asking educational institutions to solve social and economic problems. Educational Theory, 58(4), 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broome, J. (2008). The ethics of climate change: Pay now or pay more later?. Scientific American, 298(6). Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-ethics-of-climate-change.
  8. Brown, P. (2004). Melting ice: the threat to London’s future. The Guardian. Retrieved July 23, 2010, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/jul/14/sciencenews.environment.
  9. Bruce, M., & Nies, Y. D. (2009). Obama unveils race for school billions. ABC World News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=8167411&page=1.
  10. Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Carter, L. (2008). Sociocultural influences on science education: Innovation for contemporary times. Science Education, 92(1), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cicerone, R. J. (2009). Avoiding Unmanageable Climate Change and Managing Unavoidable Changes. Paper presented at the science and technology in society forum. from http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ABOUT_President_Speeches_STS_Forum_Oct_2009.
  13. Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Carbon metabolism: Global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory and Society, 34(4), 391–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cuban, L. (2004). Making public schools business-like… Again. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37, 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cuban, L., & Shipps, D. (Eds.). (2000). Reconstructing the common good in education: Coping with intractable american dilemmas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Daily, G. C., & Ellison, K. (2002). The new economy of nature: The quest to make conservation profitable. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  17. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Depaepe, M., & Smeyers, P. (2008). Educationalization as an ongoing modernization process. Educational Theory, 58(4), 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. School Journal, 54, 77–80. Retrieved from http://dewey.pragmatism.org/creed.htm.
  21. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington: National Research Council.Google Scholar
  22. Fendler, L. (2008). New and improved educationalising: faster, more powerful and longer lasting. Ethics and Education, 3(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. G8+5 Academies’ joint statement: Climate change and the transformation of energy technologies for a low carbon future. (2009). Retrieved from www.nationalacademies.org/includes/G8+5energy-climate09.pdf.
  25. Galbraith, J. K. (2008). The predator state. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glass, G. V. (2008). Fertilizers, pills, and magnetic strips: The fate of public education in America. Charlotte, N.C: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Golden, B. W., & Saka, Y. Y. (2009). Emphasis given to climate change in state science standards: Are states warming up to the science? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.Google Scholar
  29. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structures: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gruenewald, D. A. (2004). A Foucauldian analysis of environmental education: Toward the socioecological challenge of the earth charter. Curriculum Inquiry, 34(1), 71–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (Eds.). (2008). Place-based education in the global age : local diversity. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  32. Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Beerling, D., Berner, R., Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. (2008). Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hardin, G. (2009). The tragedy of the commons. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 1(3), 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hasselmann, K., Latif, M., Hoos, G., Azar, C., Edenhoffer, O., Jaeger, C. C., et al. (2006). The challenge of long-term climate change. In D. Kennedy (Ed.), State of the planet 2006–2007 (pp. 172–182). Washington DC: American Association for the advancement of science.Google Scholar
  36. Henderson, S., & Agency, E. P. (1993). Global climates–past. Washington D. C: Office of Research and Development, Present, and Future. Activities for Integrated Science Education.Google Scholar
  37. Henson, R. (2008). The rough guide to climate change. New York: Rough Guides Ltd.Google Scholar
  38. Hocking, C. (1990). Global warming & the greenhouse effect: [teacher's guide]. Berkeley, Calif.: Great Explorations in Math and Science (GEMS), Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California.Google Scholar
  39. IPCC. (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.Google Scholar
  40. IPCC. (2007a). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.Google Scholar
  41. IPCC. (2007b). IPCC fourth assessment report climate change 2007. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  42. IPCC. (2007c). Technical summary. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge, UK: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  43. IPCC. (2008). Climate change and water. Technical paper of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC Secretariat.Google Scholar
  44. Kajikawa, Y., Ohno, J., Takeda, Y., Matsushima, K., & Komiyama, H. (2007). Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: An analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., & Hartley, J. A. (1995). Environmental values and American culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kerr, R. A. (2007). Climate change: Global warming is changing the world. Science, 316(5822), 188–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The Struggle for the American curriculum 1893–1958 (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  48. Komiyama, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2006). Sustainability science: Building a new discipline. Sustainability Science, 1(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Labaree, D. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81.Google Scholar
  50. Labaree, D. F. (2008). The winning ways of a losing strategy: Educationalizing social problems in the united states. Educational Theory, 58(4), 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lambeir, B., & Ramaekers, S. (2008). Humanizing education and the educationalization of health. Educational Theory, 58(4), 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leiserowitz, A. (2007). Human development report 2007/2008: International public opinion, perception, and understanding of global climate change. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  53. Lester, B. T., Ma, L., Lee, O., & Lambert, J. (2006). Social activism in elementary science education: A science, technology, and society approach to teach global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lobell, D. B., Burke, M. B., Tebaldi, C., Mastrandrea, M. D., Falcon, W. P., & Naylor, R. L. (2008). Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science, 319(5863), 607–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, 17(3/4), 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lueddecke, S. B., Pinter, N., & McManus, S. A. (2001). Greenhouse effect in the classroom: A project- and laboratory-based curriculum. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(3), 274.Google Scholar
  58. Lynch, J. (2006). It’s not easy being interdisciplinary. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(5), 1119–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Malhi, Y., Roberts, J. T., Betts, R. A., Killeen, T. J., Li, W., & Nobre, C. A. (2008). Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science, 319(5860), 169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston, MA: Beaton.Google Scholar
  61. Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., et al. (2009). Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 458(7242), 1158–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Monastersky, R. (2009). Climate crunch: A burden beyond bearing. Nature, 458(7242), 1091–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M., & Shonkoff, S. B. (2009). The climate gap. Los Angeles, CA: USC Center for sustainable cities, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  65. Morris, S. A., & Martens, B. V. d. V. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 213–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. NRC. (1996). National Science Education Standards: The National Academies.Google Scholar
  67. Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  68. Ostrom, E. (1991). Governing the commons : The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Pew (2010). Little change in opinions about global warming, from http://people-press.org/report/669/.
  70. Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory?. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  71. Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  72. Polanyi, K. (2001). The economy as instituted process. In M. S. Granovetter & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The sociology of economic life (pp. 31–50). Boulder, Colarado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  73. Robertson, M. M. (2006). The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(3), 367–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Romps, D., & Zhiming, K. (2009). Climate: Cyclones take it higher. Nature, 459(7245), 302.Google Scholar
  75. Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89(5), 803–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sadler, T. D. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  78. Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). what do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schmidt, G., & Archer, D. (2009). Climate change: Too much of a bad thing. Nature, 458(7242), 1117–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schnaiberg, A., Pellow, D. N., & Weinberg, A. (2000). The treadmill of production and the environmental state. Evanston, IL: Institute for Policy Research.Google Scholar
  81. Schneider, S. (2009). The worst-case scenario. Nature, 458(7242), 1104–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schreiner, C., Henriksen, E. K., & Kirkeby Hansen, P. J. (2005). Climate education: Empowering today’s youth to meet tomorrow’s challenges. Studies in Science Education, 41(1), 3–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith, J. B., Schneider, S. H., Oppenheimer, M., Yohe, G. W., Hare, W., Mastrandrea, M. D., et al. (2009). Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “reasons for concern”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11), 4133–4137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sterman, J. D., & Sweeney, L. B. (2007). Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change, 80(3/4), 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stern, N. H. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Stern, N. (2009). The global deal: Climate change and the creation of a new era of progress and prosperity. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  87. Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important Ideas? Findings from project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Swedberg, R. (2005). The economic sociology of capitalism: An introduction and agenda. In V. Nee & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The economic sociology of capitalism (pp. 4–39). Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Tans, P. (2009). Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide–Mauna Loa. from NOAA/ESRL: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/.
  90. Tippins, D. J., Mueller, M. P., Eijck, M. v., & Adams, J. D. (Eds.). (2010). Cultural studies and environmentalism. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  91. Treanor, B. (2010). Environmentalism and public virtue. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vandermeer, J. H., & Perfecto, I. (2005). Breakfast of biodiversity : The political ecology of rain forest destruction. Oakland, Calif, New York: Food First Books.Google Scholar
  93. Wertsch, J. V., Tulviste, P., & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Yager, R. E. (1996). Science, technology, society as reform in science education. Albany, NY: State Univ. of New York Press.Google Scholar
  95. Ziman, J. (2002). Real science: What it is, and what it means. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Elementary and Social Studies EducationUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations