Science & Education

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 1–35 | Cite as

Using History to Teach Mathematics: The Case of Logarithms



Many authors have discussed the question why we should use the history of mathematics to mathematics education. For example, Fauvel (For Learn Math, 11(2): 3–6, 1991) mentions at least fifteen arguments for applying the history of mathematics in teaching and learning mathematics. Knowing how to introduce history into mathematics lessons is a more difficult step. We found, however, that only a limited number of articles contain instructions on how to use the material, as opposed to numerous general articles suggesting the use of the history of mathematics as a didactical tool. The present article focuses on converting the history of logarithms into material appropriate for teaching students of 11th grade, without any knowledge of calculus. History uncovers that logarithms were invented prior of the exponential function and shows that the logarithms are not an arbitrary product, as is the case when we leap straight in the definition given in all modern textbooks, but they are a response to a problem. We describe step by step the historical evolution of the concept, in a way appropriate for use in class, until the definition of the logarithm as area under the hyperbola. Next, we present the formal development of the theory and define the exponential function. The teaching sequence has been successfully undertaken in two high school classrooms.


Natural Logarithm Seventeenth Century Logarithmic Function Arithmetic Progression Geometric Progression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I wish to thank Professor Michael R. Matthews for great support and encouragement. I also wish to thank the four anonymous reviewers for their generous help in greatly improving the English in an early version of this paper and for their numerous suggestions and constructive criticism for improving both the style and content.


  1. Alexanderson, G. L. (2003). Major donation announced for new MAA conference center. Focus, 23(2), 3–5.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, K. E. (1989). An introduction to numerical analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Ayoub, R. (1993). What is a Napierian logarithm? American Mathematical Monthly, 100, 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bachelard, G. (1938/1983). La Formation De l’ Esprit Scientifique. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  5. Bartolini-Bussi, M. G., & Bazzini, L. (2003). Research, practice and theory in didactics of mathematics: Towards dialogue between different fields. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartolini-Bussi, M. G., & Sierpinska, A. (2000). The relevance of historical studies in designing and analysing classroom activities. In J. Fauvel & J. Van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education, The ICMI Study (pp. 154–161). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, A. J. (1991). Mathematical enculturation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Boyé, A. (2006). Des Logarithmes Ordinaires aux Logarithmes Naturels. In Histoire de Logarithmes (pp. 217–232). Commission Inter-IREM, Paris: EllipsesGoogle Scholar
  9. Brousseau, G. (1983). Les obstacles epistemologiques et les problemes en mathematique. Recherches en Didactiques des Mathematiques, 4(2), 164–198.Google Scholar
  10. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, R. G. (1992). Advanced mathematics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  12. Buck, R. C. (1980). Sherlock Holmes in Babylon. The American Mathematical Monthly, 87, 338–345.Google Scholar
  13. Burn, B. (1998). Napier’s logarithms. Mathematics in School, 27, 32–33.Google Scholar
  14. Burn, B. (2000). Gregory of St. Vincent and the rectangular hyperbola. The Mathematical Gazette, 84, 480–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burn, R. P. (2001). Alphonse Antonio de Sarasa and Logarithms. Historia Mathematica, 28, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cajori, F. (1913). History of the exponential and logarithmic concepts. The American Mathematical Monthly, 20(1), 5–14; 20(2), 35–47; 20(6), 173–182.Google Scholar
  17. Cajori, F. (1994). History of the logarithmic slide rule and allied instruments. Mendham, NJ: Astragal Press.Google Scholar
  18. Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique: Du savoir savavt au savoir enseigne. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.Google Scholar
  19. Churchill, R. V., Brown, J. W., & Verhey, R. F. (1974). Complex variables and applications. London: Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Coolidge, J. L. (1950). The number e. American Mathematical Monthly, 57, 591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coolidge, J. L. (1990). The mathematics of great amateurs. Oxford: Claredon.Google Scholar
  22. Dhombres, J. (1993). Is one proof enough? Travels with a mathematician of the Baroque period. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dreyfus, T. (1991a). On the status of visual reasoning in mathematics and mathematics education. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifteenth international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 32–48). IPC, PME 15, Assisi, Italy.Google Scholar
  24. Dreyfus, T. (1991b). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 25–41). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  25. Edwards, C. H. (1979). The historical development of the calculus. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Euler, L. (1748/1990). Introduction to analysis of the infinite, books I and II (J. D. Blanton, Trans.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Euler, L. (1770/1984). Elements of algebra, (John Hewlet, Trans.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Fauvel, J. (1991). Using history in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(2), 3–6.Google Scholar
  29. Fauvel, J. (1995). Revisiting the history of logarithms. In F. Swetz, J. Fauvel, O. Bekken, B. Johanson, & V. Katz (Eds.), Learn from the masters! (pp. 39–48). USA: MAA Notes.Google Scholar
  30. Fauvel, J., & Gray, J. (1987). The history of mathematics: A reader. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Fauvel, J., & van Maanen, J. (2000). History in mathematics education, The ICMI Study. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  32. Flegg, H. G., Hay, C. M., & Moss, B. (Trans.) (Ed.) (1985). Nicolas Chuquet, renaissance mathematician. Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
  33. Fowler, D. H. (1992). A final-year university course on the history of mathematics: Actively confronting the past. American Mathematical Monthly, 76, 46–48.Google Scholar
  34. Freudenthal, H. (1973). What groups mean in mathematics and what they should mean in mathematical education. In A. G. Howson (Ed.), Developments in mathematical education (pp. 101–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Freudenthal, H. (1984). The implicit philosophy of mathematics history and education. In Proceedings of the ICMI 1983 (Vol. 2, pp. 1695–1709). Warszawa/Amsterdam: PNW/North Holland.Google Scholar
  36. Friedelmeyer, J.-P. (1990). Teaching 6th form mathematics with a historical perspective. In J. Fauvel (Ed.), History in the mathematics classroom: The IREM papers (pp. 1–16). Leicester: Mathematical Association.Google Scholar
  37. Furinghetti, F., & Radford, L. (2002). Historical conceptual developments and the teaching of mathematics: From phylogenesis and ontogenesis theory to classroom practice. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 631–654). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Guedj, D. (1998). Le théorème du perroquet. Paris: Editions du Seuil. (F. Wynne, Trans., 2000: The Parrot’s theorem: A novel. New York: St. Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
  39. Gulikers, I., & Blom, K. (2001). A historical angle, a survey of recent literature on the use and value of history in geometrical education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 223–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hadamard, J. (1954). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  41. Hallenberg, A. (Ed.) (1989/1969). Historical topics for the mathematics classroom. In Thirty-first yearbook of NCTM. Washington, DC: The Council.Google Scholar
  42. Heath, T. L. (1956). The thirteen books of the elements (Vol. 1, 2, 3). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  43. Heiede, T. (2000). A Babylonian tablet. In J. Fauvel & J. Van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education, The ICMI Study (pp. 255–257). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  44. Jahnke, H. H., Knoche, N., & Otte, M. (1996). History of mathematics and education: Ideas and experiences. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  45. Katz, V. (1995). Napier’s logarithms adapted for today’s classroom. In F. Swetz, J. Fauvel, O. Bekken, B. Johanson, & V. Katz (Eds.), Learn from the masters! (pp. 49–55). USA: MAA Notes.Google Scholar
  46. Klein, F. (1945). Elementary mathematics from an advanced standpoint: Arithmeticalgebraanalysis (E. R. Hedrick & C. A. Noble, Trans.). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Kline, M. (1972). Mathematical thought from ancient to modern times. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kouteynikoff, O. (2006). Inventions de Nombres: Calculs ou Resolutions? In Histoire de Logarithmes (pp. 11–37). Commission Inter-IREM, Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
  49. Kronfellner, M. (1996). The history of the concept of function and some implications for classroom teaching. In R. Calinger (Ed.), Vita mathematica: Historical research and integration with teaching (pp. 317–320). Washington: MAA.Google Scholar
  50. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lubet, J-P. (2006). Dans le Traités d’ Analyse: Logarithmes et Exponentielles au Gré de la Rigueur. In Histoire de Logarithmes (pp. 233–268).Commission Inter-IREM, Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
  52. McBride, C. C., & Rollins, J. H. (1977). The effects of history of mathematics on attitudes toward mathematics of college algebra students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(1), 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Menghini, M. (2000). On potentialities, limits and risks. In J. Fauvel & J. Van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education, The ICMI Study (pp. 86–90). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  54. Ofir, R., & Arcavi, A. (1992). Word problems and equations: An historical activity for the algebra classroom. The Mathematical Gazette, 76(475), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pierce, R. C. (1977). Sixteenth-century astronomers had prosthaphaeresis. The Mathematics Teacher, 70, 613–614.Google Scholar
  56. Pólya, G. (1954/1990). Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Pólya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery (Vol. II). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Radford, L., & Guérette, G. (1996). Second degree equations in the classroom: A Babylonian approach. In V. Katz (Ed.), Using history to teach mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 69–75). Washington: MAA.Google Scholar
  59. Resnikoff, H. L., & Wells, R. O., Jr. (1984). Mathematics in civilization. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  60. Rowe, D. E. (1996). New trends and old images in the history of mathematics. In R. Calinger (Ed.), Vita mathematica: Historical research and integration with teaching (pp. 3–16). Washington: MAA.Google Scholar
  61. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational studies in mathematics, 22, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sierpinska, A. (1994). Understanding in mathematics. London, Washington, DC: The Falmer.Google Scholar
  64. Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Zentrallblatt fur Didactik der Mathematik, 3, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, D. E. (1915). The law of exponents in the works of the sixteenth century. In C. G. Knott (Ed.), Napier tercentenary memorial volume (pp. 81–91). London: Longmans Green and Co.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, D. E. (1923/1958). History of mathematics (Vol. 2). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, D. E. (1929/1959). A source book in mathematics. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  68. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Struik, D.J. (1948/1987). A concise history of mathematics. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  70. Swade, D. (1991). Charles Babbage and his calculating engines. London: Science Museum.Google Scholar
  71. Swetz, F. (1984). Seeking relevance? Try the history of mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 77(1), 54–62.Google Scholar
  72. Swetz, F. (1987). Capitalism and arithmetic: The new math of the 15th century. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  73. Swetz, F. (1995). To know and to teach: Mathematical pedagogy from a historical context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Van der Waerden, B. L. (1961). Science awakening. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  75. Van Looy, H. (1984). A chronology and historical analysis of the mathematical manuscripts of Gregorius a Sanctio Vincentio. Historia Mathematica, 11, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vasco, C. E. (1995). History of mathematics as a tool for teaching mathematics for understanding. In D. N. Perkins, et al. (Eds.), Software goes to school (pp. 56–69). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Waldeg, G. (1997). Histoire, Epistemologie et Methodologie dans la Recherche en Didactique. For The Learning of Mathematics, 17(1), 43.Google Scholar
  78. Whiteside, D. T. (1960–1962). Mathematical thought in the later 17th century. Archive for the History of Exact Science, 1, 179–387.Google Scholar
  79. Whiteside, D. T. (1967–1976). The mathematical papers of Isaac Newton (Vol. I, II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School Advisor in MathematicsEviaGreece

Personalised recommendations