Science & Education

, Volume 18, Issue 8, pp 1083–1093 | Cite as

First Year Turkish Science Undergraduates’ Understandings and Misconceptions of Light

  • Mehmet Yalcin
  • Sema Altun
  • Umit Turgut
  • Fatma Aggül


The present study aims to identify first year Turkish Science undergraduates’ understandings and misconceptions of the concept of light and its propagation. For this purpose, an instrument composed of four open-ended questions was developed by the researchers. The diagnostic test was piloted with twenty students and modifications were made prior to the final administration of the test. The content validity of the test questions was assessed by two physics researchers and one lecturer. These questions were administered to a hundred first year undergraduates (aged 16–18) enrolled in the Science Teacher Training Department in Ataturk University in Turkey. In addition, the semi-structured interviews of 30–40 min were conducted with the four students whose responses involved common misunderstanding. All interview records were transcribed and analysed. The findings showed that undergraduates’ understanding of light is poor and also they have important and prevalent misconceptions. Identified misconceptions, some of which have been reported in the literature, are discussed qualitatively. The misunderstandings identified were compared with those in the literature. The results have some implications for teaching light, suggesting that a substantial revision of teaching strategies is needed.


Teacher Candidate Light Flux Sound Understanding Street Lamp Traditional Teaching Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Andersson B, Karrqvist C (1982) Light and its properties: EKNA report no 8, Goteborgs University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson B, Karrqvist C (1983) How Swedish pupils aged 12–15 years understand light and its properties. Eur J Sci Educ 5(4):387–402Google Scholar
  3. Anderson CW, Smith EL (1986) Children’s conceptions of light and color: understanding the role of unseen rays. Research series no. 166. Sci Educ Res, ED270318Google Scholar
  4. Bell P, Linn MC (2000) Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE (Knowledge Integration Environment). Int J Sci Educ 22:797–817. doi: 10.1080/095006900412284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brickhouse NW (1994) Children’s observations, ideas, and the development of classroom theories about light. J Res Sci Teach 31:639–656. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660310606 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fetherstonhaugh T, Treagust DF (1992) Students’ understanding of light and its properties: teaching to engender conceptual change. Sci Educ 76:653–672. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730760606 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fetherstonhaugh A, Happs J, Treagust D (1987) Student misconceptions about light: a comparative study of prevalent views found in Western Australia, France New Zealand, Sweden and the United States. Res Sci Educ 17(1):156–164. doi: 10.1007/BF02357183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galili I, Hazan A (2000) Learners’ knowledge in optics: interpretation, structure and analysis. Int J Sci Educ 22:57–88. doi: 10.1080/095006900290000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galili I, Lavrik V (1998) Flux concept in learning about light: a critique of the present situation. Sci Educ 82:591–613. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199809)82:5<591::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldberg F, MacDermott LC (1987) An investigation of student understanding of the real image formed by a converging lens or concave mirror. Am J Phys 55:108–119. doi: 10.1119/1.15254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guesne E (1978) Lumiere et vision des objects: Un exemple de representations des phenomenes physique, pre-existant a l’enseignement [Light and seeing objects: an example of pre-instruction representation of physical phenomena]. In Delacote G (ed) Physics teaching in schools, pp 265–273Google Scholar
  12. Guesne E (1985) Light. In Driver R, Guesne E, Tiberghien A (eds) Children’s ideas in science. Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Haidar AH, Abraham MRA (1991) Comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concepts based on the particulate nature of matter. J Res Sci Teach 28(10):919–938Google Scholar
  14. Jung W (1981) Conceptual frameworks in elementary optics. Working paper presented at the conference in Ludwigsburg, Frankfurt au Main, September 14–16Google Scholar
  15. Jung W (1987) Understanding students’ understanding. The case of elementary optics. In Novak J (ed) Proceedings of the 2. International Seminar “Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics”, vol III. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, pp 268–277Google Scholar
  16. Kutluay Y (2005) Diagnosis of eleventh grade students’ misconceptions about geometric optic by a three-tier test. Unpublished Master Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  17. Langley D, Ronen M, Eylon B (1997) Light propagation and visual patterns: preinstruction learners’ conceptions. J Res Sci Teach 34(4):399–424. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199704)34:4<399::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-MCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linn M, Hsi S (2000) Computers, teachers, peers: science learning partners. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  19. Reiner M (1998) Thought experiments and collaborative learning in physics. Int J Sci Educ 20(9):1043–1058 doi: 10.1080/0950069980200903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rice K, Feher E (1987) Pinholes and images: children’s conceptions of light and vision. Sci Educ 71:629–639. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730710413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sadler PM, Tai RH (1997) The role of high school physics in preparing students for college physics. Phys Teach 35:282–285 doi: 10.1119/1.2344685 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stead BF, Osborne RJ (1980) Exploring students’. Concepts Light Aust Sci Teacher’s J 26(3):84–90Google Scholar
  23. Watts DM (1985) Student conceptions of light: a case study. Phys Educ 20:183–187. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/20/4/310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zee EHV, Hammer D, Bell M, Roy P, Peter J (2005) Learning and teaching science as inquiry: a case study of elementary school teachers’ investigations of light. Sci Educ 89:1007–1042. doi: 10.1002/sce.20084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Yalcin
    • 1
  • Sema Altun
    • 1
  • Umit Turgut
    • 2
  • Fatma Aggül
    • 2
  1. 1.Bayburt Education FacultyAtaturk UniversityBayburtTurkey
  2. 2.Kazim Karabekir Education FacultyAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey

Personalised recommendations