Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 33–42 | Cite as

The Large-scale Structure of Scientific Method

  • Peter Kosso
Article

Abstract

The standard textbook description of the nature of science describes the proposal, testing, and acceptance of a theoretical idea almost entirely in isolation from other theories. The resulting model of science is a kind of piecemeal empiricism that misses the important network structure of scientific knowledge. Only the large-scale description of scientific method can reveal the global interconnectedness of scientific knowledge that is an essential part of what makes science scientific.

Keywords

Scientific Knowledge Scientific Method Solar Neutrino Epistemic Virtue Theoretical Claim 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick F, Lederman NG (2000) Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. Int J Sci Educ 22:665–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Ari M (2005) Just a theory. Prometheus, Amherst, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. BonJour, L (1985) The structure of empirical knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, N, Reece, J, Simon, E (2007) Essential biology, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. Devlin K (1998) Rather than scientific literacy, colleges should teach scientific awareness. Am J Phys 66:559–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glymour C (1980) Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. Grandy R, Duschl R (2007) Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: analysis of a conference. Sci & Educ 16:141–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanson, N (1958) Patterns of discovery. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Kosso P (1992) Reading the book of nature. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuhn T (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  11. Leshner A (2005) Redefining science. Science 309:221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matthews M (1994) Science teaching: the role of history and philosophy of science. Routledge, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. McComas W (ed) (1998) The Nature of Science in Science Education. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Quine W, Ullian J (1978) The web of belief. Random House, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. Shermer M (2002) Smart people believe weird things. Sci Am 287:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Singh J (1999) Modern physics for engineers. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  17. Toulmin S (1961) Foresight and understanding. Harper & Row, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  18. van Fraassen B (1980) The scientific image. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PhilosophyNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations