Advertisement

Entrepreneurial ecosystem conditions and gendered national-level entrepreneurial activity: a 14-year panel study of GEM

  • Diana M. Hechavarría
  • Amy E. Ingram
Article

Abstract

Scholars note the importance of the entrepreneurial ecosystem in promoting new venture activity. Yet to date, limited focus has been given to its impact on female venturing. Accordingly, our study investigates if the entrepreneurial ecosystem influences the prevalence of male and female entrepreneurship over time. We analyze the effect of entrepreneurial ecosystems in 75 countries between 2001 and 2014 on the rates of entrepreneurship for men and women using aggregate data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Adult Population Survey and National Expert Survey. Findings indicate that the prevalence in entrepreneurship is highest for women when the entrepreneurial ecosystem features low barriers to entry, supportive government policy towards entrepreneurship, minimal commercial and legal infrastructure, and a normative culture that supports entrepreneurship. Conversely, we find that prevalence rates for men are highest when there is supportive government policy but weak government programs aimed towards business creation.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial ecosystems Global entrepreneurship monitor Female early-stage entrepreneurship Male early-stage entrepreneurship 

JEL codes

L26—Entrepreneurship B22—Macroeconomics B54—Feminist economics JL16—Economics of gender 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to especially thank Friederike Welter and two anonymous reviewers for their feedback and time while reviewing prior versions of our paper. We would also like to thank special issue editors Tatiana Manolova, Linda Edelman, Candida Brush, and Alicia Robb. We would also like to thank Paul Reynolds for advice provided during empirical analysis of the GEM APS and NES datasets. Finally, we also would like to thank Patricia Nickinson for her feedback on prior versions of this paper. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2015 DIANA International Research Conference in Babson, MA, where it was first-runner up for Best Empirical Paper.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Arenius, P., Hay, M., & Minniti, M. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2004 executive report. Babson College and London Business School.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Hessels, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahl, H. (2004). The scientific reproduction of gender inequality: a discourse analysis of research texts on women’s entrepreneurship. Copenhagen: CBS Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez, C., Urbano, D., Coduras, A., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2011). Environmental conditions and entrepreneurial activity: a regional comparison in Spain. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(1), 120–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arellano, M. (2003). Panel data econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.Google Scholar
  7. Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B., Heger, D., & Veith, T. (2015). Infrastructure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baughn, C. C., Chua, B. L., & Neupert, K. E. (2006). The normative context for women's participation in entrepreneruship: a multicountry study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 687–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baumol, W. J. (1990). Sir John versus the Hicksians, or theorist malgré lui? Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1708–1715.Google Scholar
  12. Blau, D. M. (1987). A time-series analysis of self-employment in the United States. The Journal of Political Economy, 95, 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bosma, N. (2013). The global entrepreneurship monitor (GEM) and its impact on entrepreneurship research. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 143–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brenner, R. (1992). Entrepreneurship and business ventures in the new commonwealth. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(6), 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carter, N., Brush, C., Greene, P., Gatewood, E., & Hart, M. (2003). Women entrepreneurs who break through to equity financing: the influence of human, social and financial capital. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 5(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Reynolds, P. D. (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carter, S., Mwaura, S., Ram, M., Trehan, K., & Jones, T. (2015). Barriers to ethnic minority and women’s enterprise: existing evidence, policy tensions and unsettled questions. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carter, S., & Shaw, E. (2006). Women’s business ownership: recent research and policy developments. Small Business Service Research Report, London: DTI.Google Scholar
  19. Casson, M. (1995). Entrepreneurship and business culture. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. Chamlou, N., Klapper, L., & Muzi, S. (2008). The environment for women’s entrepreneurship in the Middle East and North Africa. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Clark Muntean, S. & Ozkazanc-Pan, S. C. (2015). A gender integrative conceptualization of entrepreneurship. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 1(19), 27–40.Google Scholar
  22. Clarysse, B., & Bruneel, J. (2007). Nurturing and growing innovative start-ups: the role of policy as integrator. R&D Management, 37(2), 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davidsson, P., & Henrekson, M. (2002). Determinants of the prevalence of start-ups and high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 19(2), 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Delmar, F., & Davidsson, P. (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & regional development, 12(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2006). Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organization, 4(3), 215–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DeMartino, R., & Barbato, R. (2003). Differences between women and men MBA entrepreneurs: exploring family flexibility and wealth creation as career motivators. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 815–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52–73.Google Scholar
  28. DeTienne, D. R., & Chandler, G. N. (2004). Opportunity identification and its role in the entrepreneurial classroom: a pedagogical approach and empirical test. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(3), 242–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eddleston, K. A., & Powell, G. N. (2008). The role of gender identity in explaining sex differences in business owners’ career satisfier preferences. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 244–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2011). Entrepreneurship in transition economies: the role of institutions and generational change. The dynamics of entrepreneurship: evidence from the global entrepreneurship monitor data, 181–208.Google Scholar
  31. Etzioni, A. (1987). Entrepreneurship, adaptation and legitimation: a macro-behavioral perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 8(2), 175–189.Google Scholar
  32. Fischer, E., & Reuber, A. R. (2003). Support for rapid-growth firms: a comparison of the views of founders, government policymakers, and private sector resource providers. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(4), 346–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ghani, E., Kerr, W. R., & O'connell, S. (2014). Spatial determinants of entrepreneurship in India. Regional Studies, 48(6), 1071–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., Wasti, S. A., & Sikdar, A. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hechavarria, D. M., & Ingram, A. E. (2016). The entrepreneurial gender divide: hegemonic masculinity, emphasized femininity and organizational forms. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 8(3), 242–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hechavarría, D. M., Terjesen, S. A., Ingram, A. E., Renko, M., Justo, R., & Elam, A. (2017). Taking care of business: the impact of culture and gender on entrepreneurs’ blended value creation goals. Small Business Economics, 48(1), 225–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hill, F. M., Leitch, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2006). ‘Desperately seeking finance?’ The demand for finance by women-owned and-led businesses. Venture Capital, 8(02), 159–182.Google Scholar
  38. Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Honig, B. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: Toward a model of contingency-based business planning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(3), 258–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. House, R. J. (1998). A brief history of GLOBE. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 13(3/4), 230–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and post-modernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Jennings, J. E., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 663–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jones, H., Williams, M., Thorat, Y., & Thorat, A. (2003). Attitudes of rural branch manages in Madhya Pradesh, India, toward their role as providers of financial services to the poor. Journal of Microfinance/ESR Review, 5(2), 139–168.Google Scholar
  44. Keuschnigg, C., & Nielsen, S. B. (2004). Start-ups, venture capitalists, and the capital gains tax. Journal of Public Economics, 88(5), 1011–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klapper, L. F., & Parker, S. C. (2011). Gender and the business environment for new firm creation. The World Bank Research Observer, 26(2), 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klepper, S., & Sleeper, S. (2005). Entry by spinoffs. Management Science, 51(8), 1291–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Hart, Schaffner and Marx.Google Scholar
  48. Lee, S.-H., Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Barney, J. B. (2011). How do bankruptcy laws affect entrepreneurship development around the world? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 505–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leibenstein, H. (1968). Entrepreneurship and development. The American Economic Review, 58(2), 72–83.Google Scholar
  50. Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., Phan, P. H., & Balkin, D. B. (2004). Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: do incentive systems matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marlow, S., & Carter, S. (2004). Accounting for change: professional status, gender disadvantage and self-employment. Women in Management Review, 19(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marlow, S., & Patton, D. (2005). All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance, and gender. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 717–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McMullen, J. S., Bagby, D., & Palich, L. E. (2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 875–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: productive, unproductive, or destructive? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 779–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mittal, M., & Vyas, R. K. (2011). A study of psychological reasons for gender differences in preferences for risk and investment decision making. IUP Journal of Behavioral Finance, 8(3), 45.Google Scholar
  57. Mullins, J. W., & Forlani, D. (2005). Missing the boat or sinking the boat: a study of new venture decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nadkarni, S., & Narayanan, V. K. (2007). Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: the moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strategic Management Journal, 28(3), 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance: Cambridge university pressGoogle Scholar
  60. Oosterbeek, H., Van Praag, M., & Ijsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review, 54(3), 442–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peterman, N. E., & Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise education: influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Porter, M. E., Sachs, J., Cornelius, P. K., McArthur, J. W., & Schwab, K. (2002). The global competitiveness report 2001–2002 (pp. 16–25). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Reynolds, P. D. (2011). New firm creation: a global assessment of national, contextual, and individual factors. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 6(5–6), 314–496.Google Scholar
  64. Reynolds, P. D. (2012). Entrepreneurship in developing economies: the bottom billions and business creation. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 8(3), 141–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., et al. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Robinson, W. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. International Journal of Epidemiology, 38, 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Salimath, M. S., & Cullen, J. B. (2010). Formal and informal institutional effects on entrepreneurship: a synthesis of nation-level research. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 18(3), 358–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Santos, F. J., Roomi, M. A., & Liñán, F. (2016). About gender differences and the social environment in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sobel, R. S. (2008). Testing Baumol: institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sobel, R. S., Clark, J., & Lee, D. R. (2007). Freedom, barriers to entry, entrepreneurship, and economic progress. The Review of Austrian Economics, 20(4), 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stevenson, L., & Lundström, A. (2007). Dressing the emperor: the fabric of entrepreneurship policy. Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy, 94–129.Google Scholar
  74. Storey, D. J. (2003). Entrepreneurship, small and medium sized enterprises and public policies. In D. B. Audretsch, & Z. J. Acs (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 476–511). Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  75. Terjesen, S., Hessels, J., & Li, D. (2016). Comparative international entrepreneurship: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(1), 299–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Van de Ven, H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Van Stel, A., Storey, D. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Walker, D., & Joyner, B. E. (1999). Female entrepreneurship and the market process: gender-based public policy considerations. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 95.Google Scholar
  79. Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Entrepreneurship, Muma College of BusinessUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.College of Business and Behavioral SciencesClemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations