Advertisement

Business owners, employees, and firm performance

  • Mika Maliranta
  • Satu Nurmi
Article

Abstract

The novel Finnish Longitudinal OWNer-Employer-Employee (FLOWN) database was used to analyze how the characteristics of owners and employees relate to firm performance as determined by labor productivity, survival, and employment growth. Focusing on the role of the employment history, the results show that previous experience in a high-productivity firm strongly predicts high productivity and probability of survival for the entrepreneur’s new firm. This can be interpreted as evidence of knowledge spillovers through labor mobility of both the owners and the employees. The results also show that the owner’s high education in a technical field is positively related to firm performance. Different findings for owner-entrepreneurs and pure owners suggest that the definition of entrepreneurship matters.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Ownership Firm performance Human capital Diffusion of knowledge 

JEL codes

L25 L26 J24 J62 O33 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Ari Hyytinen, Antti Kauhanen, Pekka Ilmakunnas and Petri Rouvinen as well as participants at the XXXVIII Annual Meeting of the Finnish Economic Association in Pori and the ETLA workshop for invaluable comments and suggestions. Part of the data gathering and analysis was carried out at Statistics Finland under its terms and conditions for confidentiality. For access to the data, contact the Research Services of Statistics Finland, FI-00022 Statistics Finland.

Funding information

The work was supported by TEKES, the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (project 2867/31/2013) and the TT Foundation.

References

  1. Aghion, P., Akcigit, U. & Howitt, P. (2014). Chapter 1—What do we learn from Schumpeterian growth theory? In A. Philippe & N. D. Steven (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. Volume 2, pp. 515–563): Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Ali-Yrkkö, J., Pajarinen, M., Rouvinen, P. & Ylä-Anttila, P. 2007. Family businesses and globalization in Finland. Available at SSRN 981129.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, M., Baltzopoulos, A., & Lööf, H. (2012). R&D strategies and entrepreneurial spawning. Research Policy, 41(1), 54–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anyadike-Danes, M., Bjuggren, C.-M., Gottschalk, S., Hölzl, W., Johansson, D., Maliranta, M., et al. (2015). An international cohort comparison of size effects on job growth. Small Business Economics, 44(4), 821–844.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9622-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balsvik, R. (2011). Is labor mobility a channel for spillovers from multinationals? Evidence from Norwegian manufacturing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 285–297.  https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates, T. (1990). Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. The Review of Economics and Statistics,  https://doi.org/10.2307/2109594 551-559.
  7. Berglann, H., Moen, E. R., Røed, K., & Skogstrøm, J. F. (2011). Entrepreneurship: origins and returns. Labour Economics, 18(2), 180–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2010.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloom, N., Genakos, C., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2012). Management practices across firms and countries. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1), 12–33.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloom, N., Sadun, R. & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Management as a technology? , Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 16–133.Google Scholar
  10. Carree, M., & Klomp, L. (1996). Small business and job creation: a comment. Small Business Economics, 8(4), 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 81–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: a competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795–816.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, A. C., Gimeno-Gascon, F. J., & Woo, C. Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 371–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90013-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dahlqvist, J., Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2000). Initial conditions as predictors of new venture performance: a replication and extension of the Cooper et al. study. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/146324400363491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, S. J. & Haltiwanger, J. 1999. Gross job flows. In O. C. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics, Volume 3b: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J., & Schuh, S. (1996). Small business and job creation: dissecting the myth and reassessing the facts. Small Business Economics, 8(4), 297–315 http://www.jstor.org/stable/40228707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, J. S., Haltiwanger, J., Handley, K., Jarmin, R., Lerner, J., & Miranda, J. (2014). Private equity, jobs, and productivity. American Economic Review, 104(12), 3956–3990.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.12.3956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dumont, M., Rayp, G., Verschelde, M. & Merlevede, B. 2016. The contribution of start-ups and young firms to industry-level efficiency growth. Applied Economics,  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1184381, 1–16.
  19. Ehrl, P. (2014). High-wage workers and high-productivity firms—a regional view on matching in Germany. BGPE Discussion Paper, No. 149.Google Scholar
  20. Elfenbein, D. W., Hamilton, B. H., & Zenger, T. R. (2010). The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Science, 56(4), 659–681.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00146-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goetz, C., Hyatt, H. R., McEntarfer, E. & Sandusky, K. 2017. The promise and potential of linked employer-employee data for entrepreneurship research. In J. Haltiwanger, E. Hurst, J. Miranda & A. Schoar (Eds.), Measuring entrepreneurial businesses: current knowledge and challenges (Vol. Studies in Income and Wealth, Volume 75, pp. 433–462): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Haltiwanger, J. C., Lane, J. I., & Spletzer, J. R. (1999). Productivity differences across employers: the roles of employer size, age, and human capital. American Economic Review, 89(2), 94–98 http://www.jstor.org/stable/117087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haltiwanger, J. C., Lane, J. I., & Spletzer, J. R. (2007). Wages, productivity, and the dynamic interaction of businesses and workers. Labour Economics, 14(3), 575–602.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2005.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 347–361.  https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., Kulick, R. & Miranda, J. 2017. High growth young firms: contribution to job, output, and productivity growth. In J. Haltiwanger, E. Hurst, J. Miranda & A. Schoar (Eds.), Measuring entrepreneurial businesses: current knowledge and challenges (pp. 11–62): University of Chicago Press (available at http://www.nber.org/chapters/c13492.pdf ).
  27. Hyytinen, A., & Maliranta, M. (2008). When do employees leave their job for entrepreneurship? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(1), 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.l467-9442.2008.00522.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hyytinen, A., & Maliranta, M. (2013). Firm lifecycles and evolution of industry productivity. Research Policy, 42(5), 1080–1098.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hyytinen, A., Lahtonen, J., & Pajarinen, M. (2014). Forecasting errors of new venture survival. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(4), 283–302.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ilmakunnas, P., & Maliranta, M. (2005). Technology, labour characteristics and wage-productivity gaps. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(5), 623–644.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00134.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ilmakunnas, P. & Maliranta, M. 2016. How does the age structure of worker flows affect firm performance? Journal of Productivity Analysis,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-016-0471-5, 1–20.
  32. Ilmakunnas, P., Maliranta, M. & Vainiomäki, J. 2001. Linked employer-employee data on Finnish plants for the analysis of productivity, wages and turnover. In T. Jensen & A. Holm (Eds.), Nordic labour market research on register data (pp. 205–246). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. TemaNord 2001:593.Google Scholar
  33. Kerr, W. R., Nanda, R., & Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2014). Entrepreneurship as experimentation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 25–48.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kontinen, T., & Ojala, A. (2010). Internationalization pathways of family Smes: psychic distance as a focal point. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(3), 437–454.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001011068725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lazear, E. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(4), 649–680.  https://doi.org/10.1086/491605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levine, R., & Rubinstein, Y. (2016). Smart and illicit: who becomes an entrepreneur and do they earn more? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 963–1018.  https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw044.Google Scholar
  37. Lofstrom, M., Bates, T., & Parker, S. C. (2014). Why are some people more likely to become small-businesses owners than others: entrepreneurship entry and industry-specific barriers. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(2), 232–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maliranta, M. & Hurri, P. (2018). Micro-level dynamics of output, employment and productivity growth: the role of high-growth firms. Unpublished manuscript, January 2018, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  39. Maliranta, M. & Nurmi, S. (2004). Analyzing entrepreneurship with the Finnish linked employer-employee data Fleed. Matching and qualitative properties of the data. The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA), Discussion papers No. 920. Helsinki.Google Scholar
  40. Maliranta, M., Mohnen, P., & Rouvinen, P. (2009). Is inter-firm labor mobility a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence form a linked employer-employee panel. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1161–1191.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Murray, G., Hyytinen, A. & Maula, M. 2009. Growth entrepreneurship and finance. Chapters, 147–202.Google Scholar
  42. Nanda, R., & Sørensen, J. B. (2010). Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(7), 1116–1126.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pajarinen, M., Rouvinen, P. & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2006). Uusyrittäjien Kasvuhakuisuus. ETLA discussion papers, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA).Google Scholar
  44. Pajarinen, M., Rouvinen, P. & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2011). Omistajuuden Vaikutus Suomalaisen Työllisyyden Kasvuun Ja Pysyvyyteen. The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Discussion Papers No. 1242.Google Scholar
  45. Rocha, V., Van Praag, M., Folta, T. B. & Carneiro, A. J. M. (2016). Entrepreneurial choices of initial human capital endowments and new venture success. IZA, DP No. 9919.Google Scholar
  46. Sahaym, A., Howard, M. D., Basu, S., & Boeker, W. (2016). The parent’s legacy: firm founders and technological choice. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2624–2633.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.154.14280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stoyanov, A., & Zubanov, N. (2012). Productivity spillovers across firms through worker mobility. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(2), 168–198.  https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.2.168.Google Scholar
  49. Stuetzer, M., Obschonka, M., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2013). Balanced skills among nascent entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 41(1), 93–114.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9423-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tourunen, K. & Laaksonen, S. (2009). The significance of business ownership and governance: contribution and profitability of family businesses in Finland. Unpublished manuscript, June 23 2009.Google Scholar
  51. Van Biesebroeck, J. (2003). Productivity dynamics with technology choice: an application to automobile assembly. Review of Economic Studies, 70(1), 167–198 http://www.jstor.org/stable/3648615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy ETLA & University of JyväskyläHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Statistics Finland & The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy ETLAHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations