Cherry-picking or frog-kissing? A theoretical analysis of how investors select entrepreneurial ventures in thin venture capital markets
- 587 Downloads
We propose a formal model that analyzes which entrepreneurial ventures actively seek and subsequently obtain venture capital (VC) financing in thin VC markets. The model shows that in thin VC markets, (1) VC investors will invest in companies in need (frog-kissing) rather than in best performers (cherry-picking), and (2) the best performing ventures will self-select out of the market for VC. These conclusions are in line with the results from the literature, which note that in Europe many entrepreneurial firms do not actively seek VC investment and that VC investors do not appear to possess the same cherry-picking ability that they have in the US.
KeywordsHigh-tech entrepreneurship Venture capital Sorting mechanisms Self-selection out
JEL ClassificationsL26 G24 M13
We are grateful to two anonymous referees and to Silvio Vismara, the Associate Editor of the journal. We also thank for their comments on early versions of this paper: Massimo G. Colombo, Ramy Elitzur, Terttu Luukkonen, Sophie Manigart, Mariana Mazzucato, José Martí Pellón, Tereza Tykvová, Elisa Ughetto, Mike Wright, and the participants to the final VICO conference (Stresa, Italy), the 37th EARIE Annual Conference (Istanbul, Turkey), the 2010 Zvi Griliches Research Summer Seminar in the Economics of Innovation (Barcelona, Spain) and the XXI AiIG annual meeting (L’Aquila, Italy). We acknowledge support from the Venture Fun project promoted by the EU PRIME Network of Excellence, and the VICO project funded under the European FP7 (SSH-2007-1.2.3-G.A. 217485).
- Bank of England. (2001). Financing of technology-based small firms. Second Report, Domestic Finance Division, Bank of England.Google Scholar
- Bertoni, F., & Martí, J. (2011). Financing entrepreneurial ventures in Europe: The Vico Dataset (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1904297). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
- Brander, J. A., Egan, E., & Hellmann, T. (2010). Government sponsored versus private venture capital: Canadian evidence. In J. Lerner & A. Schoar (Eds.), International differences in entrepreneurship, Chapter 10. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Engel, D. (2002). The impact of venture capital on firm growth: An empirical investigation. Discussion Paper No. 02-02, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim.Google Scholar
- EY (2014). Adapting and evolving, global venture capital insights and trends 2014 report.http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Global_venture_capital_insights_and_trends_2014/$FILE/EY_Global_VC_insights_and_trends_report_2014.p.
- European Venture Capital Association (EVCA). (2010). Closing gaps and moving up a gear: The next stage of venture capital’s evolution in Europe. EVCA Venture Capital White Paper.Google Scholar
- European Venture Capital Association (EVCA). (2014). 2013 European private equity activity: Statistics on fundraising, investments & divestments. Annual Yearbook.Google Scholar
- Eurostat. (2009). Eurostat indicators of high-tech industry and knowledge—Intensive services. Annex 3—High-tech Aggregation by NACE Rev. 2.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2013). Entrepreneurship at a glance 2013. OECD annual report.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2014). Entrepreneurship at a glance 2014 . OECD annual report.Google Scholar
- Riley, J. G., & Samuelson, W. F. (1981). Optimal auctions. American Economic Review, 71, 381–392.Google Scholar