Abstract
This paper investigates the temporal and spatial dynamics of business start-up activities and their determinants. It integrates three perspectives in explaining regional variations in start-ups: (1) spatial heterogeneity that characterizes regional differences in promoting or conditioning start-up activities, (2) temporal dependence that features a self-augmenting and self-reinforcing effect of start-up activities, and (3) spatial dependence that portrays inter-regional interaction of start-up activities across proximate regions. A spatial dynamic panel modeling analysis of the determinants of new manufacturing ventures created in subnational regions of South Korea confirms that, in addition to the importance of regional characteristics, both temporal and spatial dependences of start-up activities are simultaneously in force and play statistically significant roles. To address the joint endogeneity issue of temporal and spatial dependences, we employ the system GMM estimator, which leads to much improved explanation of inter-regional variations in firm creation activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See Stam and Lambooy (2012) for a review of literature on the spatial heterogeneity perspective.
We chose 2000–2004 for the following reasons. First, Korea suffered from a severe financial crisis between late 1997 and early 1999. Economic activities before 2000, including the creation and location decisions of new ventures, would have been distorted due to the crisis. Second, the government amended the Korean Standard Industrial Classification (Korean SIC) Code in January 2000. To ensure the consistency of the types of industries to be included in our sample, we opt to use the data from 2000 onwards. Third, 2004 is the most recent year of the data to which we have access.
References
Acs, Z. J. (2006). New firm formation and the region: Empirical results from the United States. In E. Santarelli (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, growth, and innovation: The dynamics of firms and industries (International Studies in Entrepreneurship, Vol. 12, pp. 105–133). New York: Springer.
Acs, Z. J., Armington, C., & Zhang, T. (2007). The determinants of new-firm survival across regional economies: The role of human capital stock and knowledge spillover. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 367–391. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00129.x.
Andersson, M., & Koster, S. (2011). Sources of persistence in regional start-up rates—Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(1), 179–201. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp069.
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Anselin, L. (1996). The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association. In M. Fischer, H. Scholten, & D. Unwin (Eds.), Spatial analytical perspectives on GIS (pp. 111–125). London: Taylor and Francis.
Anselin, L., Bera, A., Florax, R., & Yoon, M. (1996). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(1), 77–104. doi:10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6.
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. doi:10.2307/2297968.
Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-1984-x.
Armington, C., & Acs, Z. J. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36(1), 33–45. doi:10.1080/00343400120099843.
Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Ann Arbor, Michigan Press.
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118216
Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. C. (2004). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38(8), 949–959. doi:10.1080/0034340042000280956.
Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Baum, J. A. C., & Sorenson, O. (Eds.). (2003). Geography and strategy. Advances in strategic management (Vol. 20). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. R. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.
Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 273–302. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbi022.
Bosma, N., Aces, Z., Autio, E., Coduras, A., & Levie, J. (2009). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2008 executive report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
Breitenecker, R. J., & Hams, R. (2010). Dealing with spatial heterogeneity in entrepreneurship research. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 176–191. doi:10.1177/1094428109338871.
Brixy, U., & Grotz, R. (2007). Regional patterns and determinants of birth and survival of new firms in Western Germany. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(4), 293–312. doi:10.1080/08985620701275510.
Brueckner, J. K. (2011). Lectures on urban economics. Cambridge: The MIT press.
Brush, C. G., & Vanderwerf, P. A. (1992). A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(2), 157–170. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(92)90010-O.
Cairncross, F. (1997). The death of distance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1805621
Elhorst, J. P. (2003). Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. International Regional Science Review, 26(3), 244–268. doi:10.1177/0160017603253791.
Elhorst, J. P. (2005). Unconditional maximum likelihood estimation of dynamic models for spatial models. Geographical Analysis, 37(1), 85–106. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2005.00577.x.
Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Bail, Y. (2006). Geographic cluster size and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 217–242. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.005.
Fornahl, D. (2003). Entrepreneurial activities in a regional context. In D. Fornahl & T. Brenner (Eds.), Cooperation, networks, and institutions in regional innovation systems (pp. 38–57). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Fredin, S. (forthcoming). New perspectives on innovative entrepreneurship and path dependence—A regional approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing (in press).
Fritsch, M., & Falck, O. (2007). New business formation by industry over space and time: A multidimensional analysis. Regional Studies, 41(2), 157–172. doi:10.1080/00343400600928301.
Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2007). The persistence of regional new business formation-activity over time—Assessing the potential of policy promotion programs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(3), 299–315. doi:10.1007/s00191-007-0056-6.
Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2008). The effect of new business formation on regional development over time: The case of Germany. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 15–29. doi:10.1007/s11187-007-9067-9.
Fujita, M., & Thisse, J.-F. (2002). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Graf, H. (2011). Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovators. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(1), 173–198.
Head, K., Ries, J., & Swenson, D. (1995). Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing investment in the United States. Journal of International Economics, 38(3/4), 223–247. doi:10.1016/0022-1996(94)01351-R.
Holcombe, R. G. (2007). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. In B. Powell (Ed.), Making poor nations rich: Entrepreneurship and the process of economic development. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, P., & Parker, S. (1996). Spatial variations in the determinants and effects of firm births and deaths. Regional Studies, 30(7), 679–688. doi:10.1080/00343409612331349968.
Keeble, D., & Walker, S. (1994). New firms, small firms and dead firms: Spatial patterns and determinants in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies, 28(4), 411–427. doi:10.1080/00343409412331348366.
Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937739
Kukenova, M., & Monterio, J.-A. (2008). Spatial dynamic panel model and system GMM: A Monte Carlo investigation. MPRA paper no. 14319, University Library of Munich.
Lasch, F., Robert, F., & Roy, F. L. (2013). Regional determinants of ICT new firm formation. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 671–686. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9382-z.
Maitland, E., Rose, E. L., & Nicholas, S. (2005). How firms grow: Clustering as a dynamic model of internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), 435–451. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400140.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012.
Minniti, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship and network externalities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(1), 1–27. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2004.10.002.
Nijkamp, P. (2003). Entrepreneurship in a modern network economy. Regional Studies, 37(4), 395–405. doi:10.1080/0034340032000074424.
O’Donnell, A., Gilmore, A., Cummins, D., & Carson, D. (2001). The network construct in entrepreneurship research: A review and critique. Management Decision, 39(9), 749–760. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006220.
Pijnenburg, K., & Kholodilin, K. A. (2014). Do regions with entrepreneurial neighbours perform better? A spatial econometric approach for German regions. Regional Studies, 48(5), 866–882. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.697143.
Plummer, L. A. (2010). Spatial dependence in entrepreneurship research: Challenges and methods. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 146–175. doi:10.1177/1094428109334199.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
Reynolds, P. D., Bygrave, W. D., Autio, E., & Hay, M. (2002). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2002 summary report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
Reynolds, P. D., Miller, B., & Maki, W. R. (1995). Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U.S. 1976–88. Small Business Economics, 7(5), 389–407. doi:10.1007/BF01302739.
Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x.
Schienstock, G. (2007). From path dependency to path creation: Finland on its way to the knowledged-based economy. Current Sociology, 55(1), 92–109. doi:10.1177/0011392107070136.
Schwab, K. (2009). The competitiveness report 2009–2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Smith, H. L., Glasson, J., & Chadwick, A. (2005). The geography of talent: Entrepreneurship and local economic development in Oxfordshire. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 17(6), 449–478. doi:10.1080/08985620500247819.
Stam, E., & Lambooy, J. (2012). Entrepreneurship, knowledge, space, and place: Evolutionary economic geography meets Austrian economics. In D. E. Andersson (Ed.), The spatial market process (Advances in Austrian Economics, Vol. 16, pp. 81–103). Bingley: Emerald.
Steyaert, C., & Katz, J. (2004). Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: Geographical, discursive and social dimensions. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(3), 179–196. doi:10.1080/0898562042000197135.
St-Jean, E., & Audet, J. (2012). The role of mentoring in the learning development of the novice entrepreneur. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(1), 119–140. doi:10.1007/s11365-009-0130-7.
Stuart, T., & Sorenson, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32(2), 229–253. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00098-7.
Sun, L., Hong, E., & Li, T. (2010). Incorporating technology diffusion, factor mobility and structural change into cross-region growth regression: An application to China. Journal of Regional Science, 50(3), 734–755. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00623.x.
Trettin, L., & Welter, F. (2011). Challenges for spatially oriented entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(7–8), 575–602. doi:10.1080/08985621003792988.
van Oort, F. G., & Atzema, O. A. L. C. (2004). On the conceptualization of agglomeration economies: The case of new firm formation in the Dutch ICT sector. The Annals of Regional Science, 38(2), 263–290. doi:10.1007/s00168-004-0195-8.
Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25–51. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005.
Yu, J., de Jong, R., & Lee, L. (2008). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both n and T are large. Journal of Econometrics, 146(1), 118–134. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.08.002.
Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 290–306. http://www.jstor.org/stable/116831
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hong, E., Lee, I.H., Sun, L. et al. Entrepreneurship across time and space: empirical evidence from Korea. Small Bus Econ 44, 705–719 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9613-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9613-1