Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 361–383 | Cite as

Are high-growth firms one-hit wonders? Evidence from Sweden

  • Sven-Olov Daunfeldt
  • Daniel Halvarsson
Article

Abstract

Most firms do not grow, and a small number of high-growth firms seem to create most new jobs. These firms have therefore received increasing attention among policymakers. The question is whether high-growth tends to persist? We investigate this question using firm-level data from Sweden during 1997–2008. We find that high-growth firms had declining growth rates in the previous 3-year period, and their probability of repeating high growth rates was very low. Thus, these are essentially “one-hit wonders,” and it is doubtful whether policymakers can improve economic outcomes by targeting them.

Keywords

Gazelles High-growth firms Growth persistence  Autocorrelation Transition probabilities 

JEL Classification

L11 L25 L26 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mats Bergman, Pontus Braunerhjelm, Alex Coad, Hans Lööf, Björn Falkenhall, Rick Wicks, seminar participants at KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Ratio, Tillväxtanalys, and Umeå University, as well as two anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions. Ragnar Söderbergs Stiftelse is gratefully acknowledged for financial support, and Tillväxtanalys for providing data.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J. (2011). High-impact firms: Gazelles revisited. In M. Fritsch (Ed.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship and regional development: National and regional perspectives (pp. 133–174). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Mueller, P. (2008). Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice. Gazelles and Elephants. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 85–100. doi: 10.1007/s11187-007-9052-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, T., & Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 18(1), 47–82. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(82)90095-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonelli, C. (1997). The economics of path-dependence in industrial organization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(6), 643–675. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00006-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. doi: 10.2307/2297968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D., Klomp, L., Santarelli, E., & Thurik, A. (2004). Gibrat’s law: Are the services different? Review of Industrial Organization, 24(3), 301–324. doi: 10.1023/B:REIO.0000038273.50622.ec.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, D. D., & Cullen, J. B. (1993). Administrative reorganization and configurational context: The contingent effects of age, size, and change in size. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1251–1277. doi: 10.2307/256811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birch, D., & Medoff, J. (1994). Gazelles. In C. S. Lewis & R. L. Alec (Eds.), Labor markets, employment policy and job creation (pp. 159–167). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bjuggren, C., Daunfeldt, S., & Johansson, D. (2013). Ownership and high-growth firms. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 26, 365–385. doi: 10.1080/08276331.2013.821765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boeri, T. (1989). Does firm size matter? Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 48(9), 477–95.Google Scholar
  12. Bond, S. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 141–162. doi: 10.1007/s10258-002-0009-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bottazzi, G. (2002). Corporate growth and industrial structures: Some evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 705–723. doi: 10.1093/icc/11.4.705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (2003a). Common properties and sectoral specificities in the dynamics of U.S. manufacturing companies. Review of Industrial Organization, 23(3/4), 217–232. doi: 10.1023/B:REIO.0000031366.28559.c1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (2003b). Why are distributions of firm growth rates tent-shaped? Economics Letters, 80(3), 415–420. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00142-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bottazzi, G., Coad, A., Jacoby, N., & Secchi, A. (2011). Corporate growth and industrial dynamics: Evidence from french manufacturing. Applied Economics, 43(1), 103–116. doi: 10.1080/00036840802400454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bravo-Biosca, A. (2010). Growth dynamics exploring business growth and contraction in Europe and the US. NESTA: Research report November.Google Scholar
  18. Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (2000). Fast growing businesses: Empirical evidence from a German study. International Journal of Sociology, 30(3), 45–70.Google Scholar
  19. Capasso, M., Cefis, E., & Frenken, K. (2009). Do some firms persistently outperform?. Utrecht University discussion paper series, no. 09–28.Google Scholar
  20. Chesher, A. (1979). Testing the law of proportionate effect. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4), 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coad, A. (2007). A closer look at serial growth rate correlation. Review of Industrial Organization, 31(1), 69–82. doi: 10.1007/s11151-007-9135-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coad, A. (2009). The growth of firms: A survey of theories and empirical evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Coad, A., & Hölzl, W. (2009). On the autocorrelation of growth rates. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 9(2), 139–166. doi: 10.1007/s10842-009-0048-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coad, A., Daunfeldt, S., Johansson, D., & Wennberg, K. (2014). Whom do high-growth firms hire? Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(4), 293–327. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtt051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coad, A. J. L., Frankish, J., Roberts, R., & Storey, D. (2013). Growth paths and survival chances: An application of gambler’s ruin theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 615–632. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Contini, B., & Revelli, R. (1989). The relationship between firm growth and labor demand. Small Business Economics, 1(4), 309–314. doi: 10.1007/BF00393810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Daunfeldt, S., Halvarsson, D., & Johansson, D. (2013). A cautionary note on using the eurostat-oecd definition of high-growth firms. HUI Working Paper 65, Stockholm: HUI Research.Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  28. Daunfeldt, S., Elert, N., & Johansson, D. (2014). Economic contribution of high-growth firms: Do policy implications depend on the choice of growth indicator? Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 14(3), 337-365.Google Scholar
  29. Davidsson, P., & Henrekson, M. (2002). Determinants of the prevalance of start-ups and high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 19(2), 81–104. doi: 10.1023/A:1016264116508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. De Haan, J., Scholtens, B., & Shehzad, C. (2009). Growth and earnings persistence in banking firms: A dynamic panel investigation. cESifo working paper series, no. 2772.Google Scholar
  31. Delmar, F., & Wiklund, J. (2008). The effect of small business managers’ growth motivation on firm growth: A longitudinal study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 437–457. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00235.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of business venturing, 18(2), 189–216. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00080-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (2010). Technical change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. In: B. H. Hall, N. Rosenberg (Eds) Handbook of The Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1 (pp. 51–127), North-Holland, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol 1.Google Scholar
  34. Dunne, J., & Hughes, A. (1994). Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s. Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(2), 115–40. doi: 10.2307/2950485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. European-Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth: Communication from the commission. European-Commission: Research report.Google Scholar
  36. Eurostat-OECD. (2007). Eurostat-oecd manual on business demography statistics. Research report KS-RA-07-010-EN-NN, OECD.Google Scholar
  37. Fotopoulos, G., & Giotopoulos, I. (2010). Gibrat’s law and persistence of growth in greek manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 191–202. doi: 10.1007/s11187-008-9163-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Garnsey, E., & Heffernan, P. (2005). Growth setbacks in new firms. Futures, 37(7), 675–697. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2004.11.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Garnsey, E., Stam, E., & Heffernan, P. (2006). New firm growth: Exploring processes and paths. Industry and Innovation, 13(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1080/13662710500513367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Geroski, P. (2002). The growth of firms in theory and in prattice. In: N. Foss, & V. Mahnke (Eds.), Competence, governance and entrepreneurship (Vol. 1, pp. 168–186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Geroski, P., Van Reenen, J., & Walters, C. (1997). How persistently do firms innovate? Research Policy, 26(1), 33–48. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00903-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gibrat, R. (1931). Les inégalités économiques. Recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
  43. Goddard, J., McKillop, D., & Wilson, J. (2002a). The growth of us credit unions. Journal of banking & finance, 26(12), 2327–2356. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00203-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Goddard, J., Wilson, J., & Blandon, P. (2002b). Panel tests of Gibrat’s law for Japanese manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(3), 415–433. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00085-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goddard, J., Molyneux, P., & Wilson, J. (2004). Dynamics of growth and profitability in banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36(6), 1069–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Halabisky, D., Dreessen, E., & Parsley, C. (2006). Growth firms in Canada, 1985–1999. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 19(3), 255. doi: 10.1080/08276331.2006.10593370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hall, B., & Mairesse, J. (2005). Testing for unit roots in panel data: An exploration using real and simulated data. In D. W. K. Andrews & J. H. Stock (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg (pp. 451–479). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Han, C., & Phillips, P. (2010). Gmm estimation for dynamic panels with fixed effects and strong instruments at unity. Econometric theory, 12(1), 119. doi: 10.1017/S026646660909063X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Headd, B., & Kirchhoff, B. (2009). The growth, decline and survival of small businesses: An exploratory study of life cycles. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 531–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00282.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2010). Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 227–244. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9172-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hoffman, A. N., & Junge, M. (2006). Documenting data on high-growth firms and entrepreneurs across 17 countries. Working paper Mimeo, Fora.Google Scholar
  52. Hölzl, W. (2014). Persistence, survival and growth: A closer look at 20 years of high growth firms and firm dynamics in austria. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 199–231. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtt054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ijiri, Y., & Simon, H. (1967). A model of business firm growth. Econometrica, 35(2), 348–355. doi: 10.2307/1909116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Koenker, R., & Bassett Jr, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(1), 33–50. doi: 10.2307/1913643.
  55. Kumar, M. (1985). Growth, acquisition activity and firm size: Evidence from the united kingdom. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 33(3), 327–338. doi: 10.2307/2098540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lee, N. (2014). What holds back high-growth firms? Evidence from UK SMEs. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 183–195. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9525-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Li, G., Li, Y., & Tsay, C. (2012). Quantile correlations and quantile autoregressive modeling. sSRN working paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2153697
  58. Littunen, H., & Tohmo, T. (2003). The high growth in new metal-based manufacturing and business service firms in Finland. Small Business Economics, 21(2), 187–200. doi: 10.1023/A:1025014427294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lockett, A., Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., & Girma, S. (2011). Organic and acquisitive growth: Re-examining, testing and extending penrose’s growth theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 48–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00879.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lopez-Garcia, P., & Puente, S. (2012). What makes a high-growth firm? A dynamic probit analysis using Spanish firm-level data. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 1029–1041. doi: 10.1007/s11187-011-9321-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lotti, F., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2003). Does gibrat’s law hold among young, small firms? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(3), 213–235. doi: 10.1007/s00191-003-0153-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lotti, F., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2009). Defending gibrat’s law as a long-run regularity. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 31–44. doi: 10.1007/s11187-007-9071-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Madsen, E. (2010). Unit root inference in panel data models where the time-series dimension is fixed: A comparison of different tests. Econometrics Journal, 13(1), 63–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2009.00302.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, gibrat’s law, innovation, and the growth of firms. The American Economic Review, 52(5), 1023–1051.Google Scholar
  65. Oliveira, B., & Fortunato, A. (2006). Testing Gibrat’s law : Empirical evidence from a panel. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 13(1), 65–81. doi: 10.1080/13571510500519996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oliveira, B., & Fortunato, A. (2008). The dynamics of the growth of firms: Evidence from the services sector. Empirica, 35(3), 293–312. doi: 10.1007/s10663-008-9065-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Parker, S., Storey, D., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2010). What happens to gazelles? the importance of dynamic management strategy. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 203–226. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9250-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth ofthe firm. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  69. Reichstein, T., Dahl, M. S., Ebersberger, B., & Jensen, M. B. (2010). The devil dwells in the tails. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(2), 219–231. doi: 10.1007/s00191-009-0152-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schreyer, P. (2000). High-growth firms and employment. Research report 72, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers.Google Scholar
  71. Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2014). High-growth firms and innovation: An empirical analysis for Spanish firms. Small Business Economics, forthcomming,. doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9563-7.Google Scholar
  72. Singh, A., & Whittington, G. (1975). The size and growth of firms. Review of Economic Studies, 42(438), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stanley, M., Amaral, L., Buldyrev, S., Havlin, S., Leschhorn, H., Maass, P., et al. (1996). Scaling behaviour in the growth of companies. Nature, 379(6568), 804–806. doi: 10.1038/379804a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sutton, J. (1997). Gibrat’s legacy. Journal of economic Literature, 35(1), 40–59.Google Scholar
  75. Teruel-Carrizosa, M. (2006). Firm growth, persistence and multiplicity of equilibria: An analysis of spanish manufacturing and service industries. PhD thesis, Universitat Rovira i Virgili.Google Scholar
  76. Tschoegl, A. (1983). Size, growth, and transnationality among the world’s largest banks. The Journal of Business, 56(2), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vander Vennet, R. (2001). The law of proportionate effect and OECD bank sectors. Applied Economics, 33(4), 539–546. doi: 10.1080/00036840122263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wagner, J. (1992). Firm size, firm growth, and persistence of chance—Testing Gibrat’s law with establishment data from the lower Saxony, 1978–1989. Small Business Economics, 4(2), 125–131. doi: 10.1007/BF00389853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Weiss, C. (1998). Size, growth, and survival in the upper austrian farm sector. Small Business Economics, 10(4), 305–312. doi: 10.1023/A:1007972518380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HUI ResearchStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsDalarna UniversityBorlängeSweden
  3. 3.Division of EconomicsThe Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  4. 4.The Ratio InstituteStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations