Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 387–406 | Cite as

The effect of innovation policy on SMEs’ employment and wages in Argentina

  • Victoria Castillo
  • Alessandro Maffioli
  • Sofía Rojo
  • Rodolfo Stucchi
Article

Abstract

This article evaluates the effect of the Argentinean Support Program for Organizational Change on employment and wages. The program aimed at increasing small and medium-sized enterprises’ competitiveness by co-financing technical assistance to support process and product innovation activities. Although employment is not usually the main objective of these types of programs, they are always implemented assuming that they create—or at least do not destroy—employment opportunities. We use a unique data set with information for the population of firms in Argentina from 1996 to 2008 to test this important assumption. Using a combination of fixed effects and matching, we find that both process and product innovation support increased employment and wages, with a higher impact on employment. In addition, we find that product innovation support had a larger effect on wages than process innovation support.

Keywords

Innovation Employment Wages Policy evaluation SMEs Argentina 

JEL classifications

D2 J23 L8 O31 O33 L26 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Gustavo Crespi, Lucas Figal, Guido Imbens, Andres Lopez, Ezequiel Tacsir, the editor, two anonymous referees, and participants in the “Mind the Gap 2011” and MEIDE conferences for useful comments. The usual disclaimers apply. This paper is part of the Inter-American Development Bank Project “Employment Generation, Firm Size and Innovation in Latin American: The Microeconomic Evidence.” The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent those of the Inter-American Development Bank or the Argentinean Ministry of Labor, Employment, and Social Security.

References

  1. Aboal, D., Garda, P., Lanzilotta, B., & Perera, M. (2011). Innovation, firm size, technology intensity, and employment generation in Uruguay: The microeconometric evidence. IDB Publications 58378, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Aerts, K., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Two for the price of one? Additionally effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research Policy, 37(5), 806–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Álvarez, R., Benavente, J. M., Campusano, R., & Cuevas, C. (2011). Employment Generation, Firm Size, and Innovation in Chile. IDB Publications 54258, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  4. Angrist, J., & Pischke, J. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arráiz, I., Henríquez, F., & Stucchi, R. (2012). Supplier development programs and firm performance: Evidence from Chile. Small Business Economics, Forthcoming. doi: 10.1007/s11187-012-9428-x.
  6. Benavente, J. M., Crespi, G., & Maffioli, A. (2012). Public support to firm level innovation: An evaluation of the FONTEC program. RBI-RevistaBrasileira de Inovação, 11, 113–152.Google Scholar
  7. Benavente, J. M., & Lauterbach, R. (2008). Technological innovation and employment: Complements or substitutes. The European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), 318–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berman, E., Bound, K., & Griliches, Z. (1994). Changes in the demand for skilled labor within US manufacturing industries: Evidence from the annual survey of manufacturers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 367–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bresnahan, T., Bryinjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 339–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cappelen, A., Raknerud, A., & Rybalka, M. (2011). The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations. Research Policy, 41(2), 334–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caroli, E., & Van Reenen, J. (2001). Skill-biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1449–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crespi, G., & Tacsir, E. (2011). Effects of innovation on employment in Latin America. MPRA Paper No. 35429.Google Scholar
  13. Czarnitzki, D., Ebersberger, B., & Fier, A. (2007). The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(7), 1347–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., & Rosa, J. (2011). Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A micro-econometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy, 40(2), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2011). Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 11-053, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  16. Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2012). Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. Research Policy, Forthcoming. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.008.
  17. de Elejalde, R., Giuliodori, D., & Stucchi, R. (2013). Employment and innovation: Firm level evidence from Argentina. ILADES Working Papers, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Chile.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission. (2002). A study of business support services and market failure. Enterprise Directorate General.Google Scholar
  19. Gonzalez, X., & Pazo, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Research Policy, 37(3), 371–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenan, N. (2003). Organizational change, technology, employment and skills: An empirical study of French manufacturing. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 287–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, B., & Lerner, J. (2009). The financing of R&D and innovation. NBER Working Papers 15325. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, B., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2008). Employment, innovation, and productivity: Evidence from Italian microdata. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4), 813–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall, B., & Maffioli, A. (2008). Evaluating the impact of technology development funds in emerging economies: Evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), 172–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrison, R., Jaumandreu, J., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2008). Does innovation stimulate employment? A firm-level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries. NBER Working Paper 14216.Google Scholar
  25. Hottenrott, H., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2012). (International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes. CEPS Working Paper No. 2012-36, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  26. Ibarraran, P., Maffioli, A., & Stucchi, R. (2010). Big questions about small firms. In C. Pagés (Ed.), The age of productivity: Transforming economies from the bottom-up. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.Google Scholar
  27. IDB. (1997). Programa de Apoyo a la Reestructuración Empresarial (AR-0144), Documento de Préstamo. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, M. (2005). Microeconometrics for policy, program, and treatment effects. Advanced Texts in Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. López-Acevedo, G., & Tan, H. (2010). Impact evaluation of SME programs in Latin America and Caribbean. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  30. OECD. (2006). The SME financing gap, theory and evidence (Vol. I). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Pianta, M. (2006). Innovation and employment. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowerey, & R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wolff, G., & Reinthaler, V. (2008). The effectiveness of subsidies revisited: Accounting for wage and employment effects in business R&D. Research Policy, 37(8), 1403–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria Castillo
    • 1
  • Alessandro Maffioli
    • 2
  • Sofía Rojo
    • 3
  • Rodolfo Stucchi
    • 4
  1. 1.Ministry of Labor, Employment, and Social SecurityBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Office of Strategic Planning and Development EffectivenessInter-American Development BankWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Unit of Investment and Corporate StrategiesEconomic Commission for Latin America and the CaribbeanSantiagoChile
  4. 4.Office of Strategic Planning and Development EffectivenessInter-American Development BankSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations