Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 363–392 | Cite as

Dependent self-employment as a way to evade employment protection legislation

  • Concepción Román
  • Emilio Congregado
  • José María Millán
Article

Abstract

This paper examines whether the strictness of employment protection legislation encourages employers to contract out work to their own paid employees by the formula of dependent self-employment, while making transitions to independent self-employment less likely by altering the relative valuation of risk between salaried work and self-employment in favour of the former. In conducting this analysis, discrete choice models are applied to data drawn from the European Community Household Panel from 1994 to 2001. To test the hypotheses, a tentative individual measure of the potential severance payment that a worker would receive in the case of dismissal is included as well as aggregated variables that try to capture differences in labour market institutions and macroeconomic conditions. Evidence for a positive impact of the strictness of employment protection legislation and the potential severance payment on transitions to dependent self-employment is found. The opposite effects, however, are detected for individuals becoming independent self-employed.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Self-employment Dependency Contracting out Occupational choice Labour market institutions 

JEL Classifications

J24 J38 J65 K31 L24 L26 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would particularly like to thank the editor, Simon Parker, two anonymous referees and María Rochina for their helpful comments and suggestions. They also thank Jolanda Hessels, Juan Máñez, Juan Sanchis, Roy Thurik, Mirjam van Praag, André van Stel, Ingrid Verheul, Sander Wennekers and participants at an EIM Business and Policy Research Seminar (Zoetermeer, 2008), the ERIM Research Workshop on Institutions and Entrepreneurship (Rotterdam, 2008), the XI World Economy Meeting (Huelva, 2009) and the XII Applied Economics Meeting (Madrid, 2009). This research is part of the project PRY115/09, which has been funded by the Fundación Centro de Estudios Andaluces (5th announcement for research projects grants). The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Autor, D. H. (2003). Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. Journal of Labor Economics, 21(1), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumgartner, H. J., & Caliendo, M. (2008). Turning unemployment into self-employment: Effectiveness of two start-up programmes. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. J. (2008). Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross country evidence. Public Choice, 134, 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, D. M. (1987). A time-series analysis of self-employment in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Böheim, R., & Müehlberger, U. (2009). Dependent self-employment: Workers between employment and self-employment in the UK. Journal of Labour Market Research, 42(2), 182–195.Google Scholar
  6. Boone, J., & van Ours, J. C. (2004). Effective active labor market policies. IZA Discussion Papers 1335, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  7. Botero, J., Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). The regulation of labor. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 1339–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruce, D., & Schuetze, H. J. (2004). Tax policy and entrepreneurship. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 2(11), 233–265.Google Scholar
  9. Burchell, B., Deakin, S., Honey, S. (1999). The employment status of individuals in non-standard employment. Employment relations Research Series 6. London: Department of Trade and Industry. http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file11628.pdf.
  10. Caliendo, M., & Kritikos, A. S. (2009). Start-ups by the unemployed: Characteristics, survival and direct employment effects. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9208-4.
  11. Carling, K., & Richardson, K. (2004). The relative efficiency of labor market programs: Swedish experience from the 1990’s. Labour Economics, 11(3), 335–354.Google Scholar
  12. Carrasco, R. (1999). Transitions to and from self-employment in Spain: An empirical analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(3), 315–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Centeno, M. (2000). Is self-employment a response to labour market rigidity? Economic Bulletin, Banco de Portugal, December, 37–44.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, H. (1990). Independent contractors and the challenge of vertical integration to employment protection laws. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 10(3), 353–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cueto, B., & Mato, J. (2006). An analysis of self-employment subsidies with duration models. Applied Economics, 38, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delage, B. (2002). Results from the survey of self-employment in Canada. Hull, QC: Human Resources Development Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Freedman, J., & Chamberlain, E. (1997). Horizontal equity and the taxation of employed and self-employed workers. Fiscal Studies, 18(1), 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grubb, D., & Wells, W. (1993). Employment regulation and patterns of work in EC countries. OECD Economic Studies, 21, 7–58.Google Scholar
  19. Henrekson, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and institutions. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 28, 717–742.Google Scholar
  20. Henrekson, M., & Roine, J. (2007). Promoting entrepreneurship in the welfare state. In D. B. Audretsch, I. Grilo, & A. R. Thurik (Eds.), The handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy (pp. 64–93). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  21. Hessels, J., van Stel, A., Brouwer, P., & Wennekers, S. (2007). Social security arrangements and early-stage entrepreneurial activity. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 28, 743–774.Google Scholar
  22. Ilmakunnas, P., & Kanniainen, V. (2001). Entrepreneurship, economic risks and risk insurance in the welfare state: Results with OECD data 1978–93. German Economic Review, 2, 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ILO. (2003). The scope of the employment relationship. Report V. International Labour Conference. 91st Session. Geneva. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc91/pdf/rep-v.pdf.
  24. Kanniainen, V., & Vesala, T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and labour market institutions. Economic Modelling, 22, 828–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klapper, L., Laevena, L., & Raghuram, R. (2007). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 591–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kugler, A., & Pica, G. (2008). Effects of employment protection on worker and job flows: Evidence from the 1990 Italian reform. Labour Economics, 15, 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meager, M., Bates, P., & Cowling, M. (2003). An evaluation of business start-up support for young people. National Institute Economic Review, 186, 59–72.Google Scholar
  28. Mortensen, D. (1986). Job search and labor market analysis. In O. C. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. II, pp. 849–919). North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  29. Müehlberger, U., & Pasqua, S. (2009). Workers on the border between employment and self-employment. Review of Social Economy, 67(2), 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nyström, K. (2008). The institutions of economic freedom and entrepreneurship: Evidence from panel data. Public Choice, 136(3), 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. OECD. (1992). The employment outlook (Chap. 4). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  32. OECD. (1999). The employment outlook (Chap. 2). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  33. OECD. (2000). The employment outlook (Chap. 5). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  34. OECD. (2004). The employment outlook (Chap. 2). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  35. OECD. (2009). The economic outlook 85 database. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  36. Parker, S. C. (1996). A time-series model of self-employment under uncertainty. Economica, 63, 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parker, S. C. (1997). The effects of risk on self-employment. Small Business Economics, 9(6), 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parker, S. C. (2002). Do banks ration credit to new enterprises? And should governments intervene? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 49, 162–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parker, S. C. (2003a). Asymmetric information, occupational choice and government policy. Economic Journal, 113, 861–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker, S. C. (2003b). Does tax evasion affect occupational choice? Oxford Economic Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65, 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parker, S. C. (2007). Law and the economics of entrepreneurship. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 28(4), 695–716.Google Scholar
  42. Parker, S. C. (2010). Contracting out, public policy and entrepreneurship. Scottish Journal of Political Economy (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  43. Parker, S. C., & Robson, M. T. (2004). Explaining international variations in self-employment: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Southern Economic Journal, 71, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pedersini, R. (2002). Economically dependent workers, employment law and industrial relations. European industrial relations observatory (EIRO) comparative study. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Working and Living Conditions. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2002/05/study/tn0205101s.htm.
  45. Perry, G. (2006). Are business start-up subsidies effective for the unemployed: Evaluation of enterprise allowance. Working Paper, Auckland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  46. Perulli, A. (2003). Economically dependent/quasi-subordinate (parasubordinate) employment. Legal, social and economic aspects. Report for DG Employment and Social Affairs. European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  47. Pfeiffer, F., & Reize, F. (2000). Business start-ups by the unemployed—an econometric analysis based on firm data. Labour Economics, 7, 629–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robson, M. T. (2003). Does stricter employment protection legislation promote self-employment? Small Business Economics, 21, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robson, M. T. (2007). Explaining cross-national variations in entrepreneurship: The role of social protection and political culture. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 28, 863–892.Google Scholar
  50. Robson, M. T., & Wren, C. (1999). Marginal average tax rates and the incentive for self-employment. Southern Economic Journal, 65, 757–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scarpetta, S., Hemmings, P., Tressel, T., Woo, J. (2002). The role of policy and institutions for productivity and firm dynamics: Evidence from micro and industry data. OECD Economics Department Working Paper, 329, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  52. Schoukens, P. (1999). Comparison of the social security law for the self-employed persons in the member-states of the European Union. In D. Pieters (Ed.), EISS yearbook 1999—Work patterns and social protection. Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  53. Schuetze, H. J. (2000). Taxes, economic conditions and recent trends in male self-employment: A Canada-US comparison. Labour Economics, 7, 507–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schuetze, H. J. (2008). Tax incentives and entrepreneurship: Measurement and data considerations. In E. Congregado (Ed.), Measuring entrepreneurship (pp. 205–225). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sciarra, S. (2005). The evolution of labour law (1992–2003). General report, based on a comparative analysis in 15 Member States of the EU. Luxembourg: OOPEC.Google Scholar
  56. Sinn, H. W. (1996). Social insurance, incentives and risk taking. International Tax and Public Finance, 3(3), 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Staber, U., & Bogenhold, D. (1993). Self-employment: A study of seventeen OECD countries. Industrial Relations Journal, 24, 126–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Supiot, A. (2001). Beyond employment. Changes in work and the future of labour law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Torrini, R. (2005). Cross-country differences in self-employment rates: The role of institutions. Labour Economics, 12, 661–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Stel, A. (2005). COMPENDIA: Harmonizing business ownership data across countries and over time. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1, 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van Stel, A., Storey, D., & Thurik, A. R. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. VandenHeuvel, A., & Wooden, M. (1995). Self-employed contractors in Australia: How many and who are they? Journal of Industrial Relations, 37(2), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Waite, M., & Will, L. (2001). Self-employed contractors in Australia: Incidence and characteristics. Productivity Commission Staff Research Paper, AusInfo, Canberra.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Concepción Román
    • 1
  • Emilio Congregado
    • 1
  • José María Millán
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad de HuelvaHuelvaSpain

Personalised recommendations