Small Business Economics

, Volume 27, Issue 4–5, pp 289–300 | Cite as

SME Policy, Financial Structure and Firm Growth: Evidence From Japan



This paper investigates the effects of public policy and financial structure on the growth of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Using a panel data set on SMEs in the Japanese manufacturing industry, we examine whether or not the SME Creative Business Promotion Law (CBPL) and financial structure affect firm growth. It is found that SMEs approved by prefectural governors under this law tend to increase assets. Further, we provide evidence that the CBPL and cash flow have an impact on the growth of younger SMEs.


Employment Growth Firm Growth Generalize Little Square Small Business Economic Sample Selection Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acs Z. J. and Audretsch D. B. (1990). Innovation and Small Firms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), 1993, Small Firms and Entrepreneurship: An East-West Perspective, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Audretsch D. B. and Elston J. A. (2002). Does Firm Size Matter? Evidence on the Impact of Liquidity Constraints on Firm Investment Behavior in Germany. International Journal of Industrial Organization 20: 1–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audretsch D. B., Link A. N. and Scott J. T. (2002). Public/Private Technology Partnerships: Evaluating SBIR-Supported Research. Research Policy 31: 145–158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Audretsch D. B., Santarelli E. and Vivarelli M. (1999). Start-Up Size and Industrial Dynamics: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization 17: 965–983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becchetti L. and Trovato G. (2002). The Determinants of Growth for Small and Medium Sized Firms. The Role of the Availability of External Finance. Small Business Economics 19: 291–306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond S. and Meghir C. (1994). Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm’s Financial Policy. Review of Economic Studies 61: 197–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter R. E. and Petersen B. C. (2002). Is the Growth of Small Firms Constrained by Internal Finance?. Review of Economics and Statistics 84: 298–309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chittenden F., Hall G. and Hutchinson P. (1996). Small Firm Growth, Access to Capital Markets and Financial Structure: Review of Issues and an Empirical Investigation. Small Business Economics 8: 59–67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunne T., Roberts M. J. and Samuelson L. (1989). The Growth and Failure of U. S. Manufacturing Plants. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 671–698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elston, J. A., 2002, ‘An Examination of the Relationship between Firm Size, Growth and Liquidity in the Neuer Market’, Discussion Paper, Economic Research Center of the Deutsche Bundesbank, 15/02Google Scholar
  12. Eshima Y. (2003). Impact of Public Policy on Innovative SMEs in Japan. Journal of Small Business Management 41: 85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans D. S. (1987a). Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth. Journal of Political Economy 95: 657–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans D. S. (1987b). The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Industrial Economics 35: 567–581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fazzari S. M., Hubbard R. G. and Petersen B. C. (1988). Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 141–195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall B. H. (1987). The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the US Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Industrial Economics 35: 583–604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harada, N. and Y. Honjo, 2005, ‘Does the Creative Business Promotion Law Enhance SMEs’ Capital Investments? Evidence from a Panel Dataset of Unlisted SMEs in Japan’, Japan and the World Economy, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  18. Harhoff D., Stahl K. and Woywode M. (1998). Legal Form, Growth and Exit of West German Firms – Empirical Results for Manufacturing, Construction, Trade and Service Industries. Journal of Industrial Economics 46: 453–488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hausman J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica 46: 1251–1271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heckman J. J. (1976). The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models. Annals of Economic Social Measurement 5: 475–492 Google Scholar
  21. Heckman J. J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47: 153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heshmati A. (2001). On the Growth of Micro and Small Firms: Evidence from Sweden. Small Business Economics 17: 213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Honjo Y. (2004). Growth of New Start-Up Firms: Evidence from the Japanese Manufacturing Industry. Applied Economics 34: 343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hubbard R. G. (1998). Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 193–225Google Scholar
  25. Jovanovic B. (1982). Selection and Evolution of Industry. Econometrica 50: 649–670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lang L., Ofek E. and Stulz R. M. (1996). Leverage, Investment, and Firm Growth. Journal of Financial Economics 40: 3–29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leung S. F. and Yu S. (1996). On the Choice between Sample Selection and Two-part Models. Journal of Econometrics 72: 197–229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu J., Tsou M. and Hammitt J. K. (1999). Do Small Plants Grow Faster? Evidence from the Taiwan Electronics Industry. Economic Letters 65: 121–129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loveman G. and Sengenberger W. (1991). The Re-emergence of Small-scale Production: An International Comparison. Small Business Economics 3: 1–37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer L. H. (1998). The Present and Future Roles of Banks in Small Business Finance. Journal of Banking and Finance 22: 1109–1116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Petersen M. A. and Rajan R. G. (1994). The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data. Journal of Finance 49: 3–37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Puhani P. A. (2000). The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique. Journal of Economic Surveys 14: 53–68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry 2002, ‘A Survey on the Development of Policy Evaluation Method Regarding the Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises (Chushokigyou no Performance ni kakaru Seisaku Hyoukashuhou no Kaihatsu ni kansuru Chousahoukoku)’ Report (Houkokusho). Research Institute of Economy, Trade and IndustryGoogle Scholar
  34. (2002). The 2002 White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan. Japan Small Business Research Institute, Tokyo Google Scholar
  35. Stiglitz J. and Weiss A. (1981). Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. American Economic Review 71: 393–410 Google Scholar
  36. Storey D. J. (1994). Understanding the Small Business Sector. Thomson Learning, London Google Scholar
  37. Sutton J. (1997). Gibrat’s Legacy. Journal of Economic Literature 25: 211–229 Google Scholar
  38. White H. (1980). A Heteroscedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 48: 817–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yasuda T. (2004). Firm Growth, Size, Age and Behavior in Japanese Manufacturing. Small Business Economics 24: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of CommerceChuo UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Systems and Information EngineeringUniversity of TsukubaIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations