Advertisement

Russian Journal of Ecology

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 81–88 | Cite as

Morphological-anatomical features of underground organs in some higher plant species in relation to their adaptation to ecological conditions

  • L. G. Tarshis
Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

In seven higher plant species of different taxa, structural features of underground organs have been considered, and the levels of intraspecific variation in some characters of these organs have been determined. Different pathways of the structural adaptation of these species to the environment are demonstrated on the morphological and anatomical levels.

Key words

intraspecific variation rhizomes roots polymorphism structural model ecological conditions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bagdasarova, T.V., Orthilia (Ramischia) secunda, in Biologicheskaya flora Moskovskoi oblasti (Biological Flora of Moscow Oblast), Moscow, 1990, pp. 172–180.Google Scholar
  2. Bagdasarova, T.V. and Vakhrameeva, M.G., One-Flowered Wintergreen, in Biologicheskaya flora Moskovskoi oblasti (Biological Flora of Moscow Oblast), Moscow, 1990, pp. 181–188.Google Scholar
  3. Barykina, R.P., Veselova, T.D., Devyatov, A.G., et al., Spravochnik po botanicheskoi mikrotekhnike. Osnovy i metody (Handbook of Botanical Microtechnique: Principles and Methods), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2004.Google Scholar
  4. Carlquist, Sh., Root, in Comparative Plant Anatomy, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961, pp. 94–101.Google Scholar
  5. Halle, F., The Concept of Architectural Models in Vascular Plants, in XII Mezhd. bot. kongr. Tez. dokl. (Abstr. XII International Botanical Congress), Leningrad: Nauka, 1975, vol. 1, p. 216.Google Scholar
  6. Khrzhanovskii, V.G. and Ponomarenko, S.F., Praktikum po kursu obshchei botaniki (A Practical Course in General Botany), Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. Krylov, P.N., Taiga s estestvenno-istoricheskoi tochki zreniya (Taiga from the Natural-Historical Viewpoint), Tomsk, 1898.Google Scholar
  8. Mamaev, S.A., Trends in Intraspecific Variation of the Family Pinaceae in the Urals, Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Sverdlovsk, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. Mamaev, S.A., Formy vnutrividovoi izmenchivosti drevesnykh rastenii (na primere semeistva Pinaceae na Urale) (Forms of Intraspecific Variation in Woody Plants: An Example of the Family Pinaceae in the Urals), Moscow: Nauka, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. Serebryakov, I.G., Morfologiya vegetativnykh organov vysshykh rastenii (Morphology of Vegetative Organs in Higher Plants), Moscow: Nauka, 1952.Google Scholar
  11. Serebryakov, I.G., Ekologicheskaya morfologiya rastenii. Zhiznennye formy pokrytosemennykh i khvoinykh (Ecological Morphology of Plants. Life Forms of Angiosperms and Conifers), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1962.Google Scholar
  12. Serebryakova, T.I., On the Main “Architectural Models” of Herbaceous Perennial Plants and Modes of Their Transformation, Byul. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 1977, vol. 82, no.5, pp. 112–128.Google Scholar
  13. Takahashi, H., On the Infraspecific Variation of Chimaphila umbellata (L.) W. Barton (Pyrolaceae), Acta Phytotax. Geobot., 1987, vol. 38, Spec. no., pp. 82–96.Google Scholar
  14. Takhtajan, A.L., Sistema magnoliofitov (The System of Magnoliales), Leningrad: Nauka, 1987.Google Scholar
  15. Tarshis, L.G., Intraspecific Variation in Representatives of the Family Pyrolaceae Dum. in the Urals, Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Sverdlovsk, 1990.Google Scholar
  16. Tarshis, L.G., Strukturnoe raznoobrazie podzemnykh organov vysshikh rastenii (Structural Diversity of Underground Organs in Higher Plants), Yekaterinburg: Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. Tsenopopulyatsii rastenii (Osnovnye ponyatiya i struktura) (Plant Cenopopulations: Main Terms and Structure), Moscow: Nauka, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Tsenopopulyatsii rastenii (Ocherki populyatsionnoi biologii) (Plant Cenopopulations: Essays on Population Biology), Serebryakova, T.I. and Sokolova, T.G., Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 1988.Google Scholar
  19. Voronin, N.S., Evolution of Primary Structures in Plant Roots, Uch. Zap. Kaluzhsk. Gos. Ped. Inst., 1964, no. 13, pp. 3–179.Google Scholar
  20. Voronin, N.S., Rukovodstvo k laboratornym zanyatiyam po anatomii i morfologii rastenii (A Manual of Laboratory Studies on Plant Anatomy and Morphology), Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1972.Google Scholar
  21. Zhmylev, P.Yu., Alekseev, Yu.E., Karpukhina, E.A., and Balandin, S.A., Biomorfologiya rastenii: illyustrirovannyi slovar’: Uch. posob. (Plant Biomorphology: Illustrated Educational Dictionary), Moscow, 2002.Google Scholar
  22. Zhukova, L.A., Diversity of Ontogenetic Pathways in Plant Populations, Ekologiya, 2001, no. 3, pp. 169–176.Google Scholar
  23. Zhukova, L.A., Biodiversity of Plants and Population Morphology, Konstruktsionnye edinitsy v morfologii rastenii: Mat-ly X Shkoly po teoreticheskoi morfologii rastenii (Construction Units in Plant Morphology. Proc. X Workshop on Theoretical Plant Morphology), Kirov, 2004, pp. 45–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. G. Tarshis
    • 1
  1. 1.Botanical Garden, Ural DivisionRussian Academy of SciencesYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations