Advertisement

Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 296–306 | Cite as

Nondestructive Testing of Mechanical Properties of Rolled Steel (Review): 1. Tests of Strength and Plastic Properties

  • G. V. Bida
Magnetic Methods

Abstract

This review considers the creation and development of a nondestructive technique based on coercive-force measurements used to determine strength and plastic properties of industrial rolling products made from Russian-produced low-carbon and low-alloy steels. The operating principle for a coercimeter equipped with a field electromagnet is described briefly. Regression lines of mechanical properties versus coercimeter readings are presented for 20Κ- and 09Γ2-steel sheets produced by Nizhni Tagil Iron and Steel Works. Different methods for considering sheet thickness and tube dimensions are discussed.

Keywords

Iron Mechanical Property Structural Material Regression Line Field Electromagnet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Leikin, I.M., Litvinenko, D.A., and Rudchenko, A.V., Proizvodstvo i svoistva nizkolegirovannykh stalei (Manufacture and Properties of Low-Alloy Steels), Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1972.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stoloff, N.S., Effect of Alloying on Fracture Characteristics, in Razrushenie (Fracture), Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1976, vol. 6, pp. 11–89.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beaucher, J.H., Grozier, J., and Enrietto, J.F., Strength and Ductility of Hot-Rolled Ferrite-Pearlite Steels, in Razrushenie (Fracture), Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1976, vol. 6, pp. 246–259.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vitsel, V.I. and Edsit, N.R., Effect of a Temperature on Fracture, in Razrushenie (Fracture), Moscow: Mir, 1977, vol. 4, pp. 68–104.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pickering, F.B., Physical Metallurgy and Design of Steels, London: Applied Science, 1978. Translated under the title Fizicheskoe metallovedenie i razrabotka stalei, Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diikstra, J.L., The Relation between Magnetic Properties and the Structure, in Struktura metallov i svoistva (Metal Structure and Properties), Moscow: Metallurgizdat, 1957, pp. 190–214.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Libsh, J.F. and Conrad, H.P., Structure and Coercivity, in Struktura metallov i svoistva (Metal Structure and Properties), Moscow: Metallurgizdat, 1957, pp. 215–241.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bida, G.V., Gorkunov, E.S., and Shevnin, V.M., Magnitnyi kontrol’ mekhanicheskikh svoistv prokata (Magnetic Inspection of Mechanical Properties of Roll Stock), Yekaterinburg: Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bida, G.V. and Kamardin, V.M., Physical Grounds for Testing Impact Elasticity of Low-Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel Rolled Stock by Magnetic Methods, Defektoskopiya, 1995, no. 10, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mikheev, M.N. and Yakutovich, M.V., Magnetic Method for Testing the Steel Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Sheet Steel, Stal’, 1945, no. 3, pp. 91–93.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kokhman, L.V. and Mikheev, M.N., Electromagnetic Testing of Mechanical Properties of Carbon-Steel Pipes, Defektoskopiya, 1969, no. 5, pp. 91–96.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aronson, E.V., Bida, G.V., Kamardin, V.M., and Mikheev, M.N., Magnetic Inspection of Mechanical Properties of Large Sections, Defektoskopiya, 1977, no. 2, pp. 125–127.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bida, G.V., On the Correlation between Mechanical Properties and the Coercive Force of Low-Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels, in Magnitnye metody nerazrushayushchego kontrolya (Magnetic Methods of Nondestructive Testing), Sverdlovsk: Ural. Nauchn. Tsentr, Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1979, pp. 15–29 (Tr. Inst. Fiz. Met., no. 37).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grigoryan, G.V. and Mul’ko, G.N., Measuring Mechanical Properties of 17Γ1C 1 Plate Steel, Defektoskopiya, 1976, no. 1, pp. 77–80.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zaugol’nikov, D.A., Aisin, R.G., and Pratusevich, A.E., The Experience of Applying Magnetomechanical Testing of Properties of Hot-Rolled Sheet Steel, Stal’, 1974, no. 2, pp. 168–170.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aronson, E.V., Bida, G.V., Kamardin, V.M., Mikheev, M.N., and Poner, D.M., Magnetic Inspection of Mechanical Properties of Plate Rolled Stock of 20Κ and 09Γ2 Steels, Defektoskopiya, 1977, no. 2, pp. 121–124.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aronson, E.V., Bida, G.V., Kamardin, V.M., and Mikheev, M.N., Magnetic Inspection of Mechanical Properties of Large Sections, Defektoskopiya, 1977, no. 2, pp. 125–127.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Timoshenko, N.N., Aisin, R.G., Bondarenko, V.A., et al., Magnetic Method for Testing Properties of Reinforcing Steel, Stal’, 1977, no. 7, pp. 661–663.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kovrigin, A.A., Yushin, P.V., Kachurin, D.S., et al., Magnetic Method for Nondestructive Testing of Mechanical Properties of Steel 3, Byull. TsIIN ChM, 1971, no. 6, pp. 52–53.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zaugol’nikov, D.A., Aisin, R.G., and Pratusevich, A.E., The Experience of Applying Magnetomechanical Testing of Properties of Hot-Rolled Sheet Steel, Stal’, 1974, no. 2, pp. 168–170.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Timoshenko, N.N., The Development and Application to Production of Methods of Nondestructive Quality Control, Stal’, 1974, no. 6, pp. 542–544.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Timoshenko, N.N., Bochkov, G.N., Alymov, A.A., et al., Nondestructive Testing of Mechanical Properties of a Hot-Rolled Strip by a Magnetic Method, Zavod. Lab., 1976, no. 8, pp. 979–980.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kovrigin, A.A., Dement’eva, N.G., and Cherdantseva, L.G., Magnetic Method for Nondestructive Testing of Mechanical Properties of 16ΓC Sheet Steel, Zavod. Lab., 1978, no. 8, pp. 991–992.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chesnov, N.A., Pyatunin, G.A., Slavov, V.I., and Lukina, A.A., Nondestructive and Statistical Check of Mechanical Properties of Section Iron, Stal’, 1980, no. 8, pp. 728–729.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mel’gui, M.A., Vostrikov, A.A., and Zborovskii, A.A., Testing Mechanical Properties of Sheet-Steel Rolled Stock by a Magnetic Method, Defektoskopiya, 1971, no. 3, pp. 10–15.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Burganova, V.A., Khalileev, P.A., Kokhman, L.V., et al., On the Possibility of Electromagnetic Inspection of the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Cold-Rolled Pipes of 12X1MΦ Steel, Defektoskopiya, 1971, no. 5, pp. 51–56.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burganova, V.A., Kokhman, L.V., et al., Electromagnetic Inspection of the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Cold-Rolled Pipes of the 12X2MΦ Steel, Defektoskopiya, 1974, no. 4, pp. 73–79.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsar’kova, T.P., Pochuev, N.D., and Bida, G.V., Magnetic Inspection of Mechanical Properties of Boiler Pipes, in Sovremennye metody nerazrushayushchego kontrolya i voprosy ego metrologicheskogo obespecheniya (Modern Methods of Nondestructive Testing and the Problems of Its Measurement Assurance), Sverdlovsk: Inst. Fiz. Met. Ural. Nauch. Tsentr Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1980, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mel’gui, M.A., Piunov, V.D., Pyatunin, G.A., and Chesnov, N.A., The Inspection of Mechanical Properties of Low-Carbon Cold-Rolled Sheet Steel by the Magnitude of the Gradient of a Local Magnetic Field, in Nerazrushayushchie metody i sredstva kontrolya in ikh primenenie v promyshlennosti (Nondestructive Methods and Means for Testing and Their Application in Industry), Minsk: Nauka i Tekhnika, 1973, pp. 98–103.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mel’gui, M.A., Piunov, V.D., Zborovskii, A.A., Vostrikov, A.A., and Baturina, S.K., Correlation Method for Testing Mechanical Properties of Sheet Rolled Stock, in Nerazrushayushchie metody i sredstva kontrolya i ikh primenenie v promyshlennosti (Nondestructive Testing Methods and Facilities and Their Application in Industry), Minsk: Nauka i Tekhnika, 1973, pp. 104–110.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mel’gui, M.A., Shidlovskaya, E.A., Vostrikov, A.A., Pyatunin, G.A., and Piunov, V.D., Nondestructive Testing of Mechanical Properties of Die Steels, Stal’, 1977, no. 2, pp. 167–170.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mel’gui, M.A., Timoshenko, N.N., Aisin, R.G., and Bondarenko, V.A., Nondestructive Magnetic Testing of a Low-Carbon Cold-Rolled Strip and Ribbon, Zavod. Lab., 1977, no. 5, pp. 581–583.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mel’gui, M.A., Matyuk, V.F., Krutikova, L.A., Shitova, G.M., and Alekseeva, V.K., Control of Hot-Rolled Stock of 3cΠ and 10cΠ Steels Using ИMA-5A Instruments, Zavod. Lab., 1988, no. 4, pp. 65–68.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mikheev, M.N., Multipurpose Portable Coercimeter for the Inspection of Thermal Treatment of Steel Products, Tr. Inst. Metalloved., Metal., Metallofiz. Ural. Fil. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1941, no. 1, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mikheev, M.N., Magnetic Method for Testing the Hardness and Microstructure of Steel Pipes, Zavod. Lab., 1938, no. 10, p. 1155.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mikheev, M.N., Neizvestnov, B.M., Morozova, V.M., and Surin, G.V., Coercimeters with Added Electromagnets, Defektoskopiya, 1969, no. 2, pp. 131–133.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mikheev, M.N., Neizvestnov, B.M., Morozova, V.M., and Surin, G.V., Coercimeters with Added Electromagnets, Defektoskopiya, 1969, no. 2, pp. 131–133.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bida, G.V. and Mikheev, M.N., Flux-Gate Coercimeter, USSR Inventor’s Certificate no. 469107, MKI3 GOIR 33/12, no. 1979920/18-10, Buyll. Izobret., 1975, no. 16, p. 2.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bida, G.V. and Mikheev, M.N., Coercimeter with a Portable Display System, Defektoskopiya, 1976, no. 5, pp. 121–123.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bida, G.V. and Bida, V.G., Coercimeters with Self-Contained Power Supply, Defektoskopiya, 1999, no. 6, pp. 36–44.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mikheev, M.N., On the Choice of the Optimum Geometry of Added Electromagnets of a Coercimeter Designed for Testing Quality of Thermal and Thermochemical Treatments of Steel and Cast-Iron Products, Fiz. Met. Metalloved., 1957, vol. 5, no.1, pp. 44–52.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mikheev, M.N., Nondestructive Methods of Testing Quality of Materials and Products, Vestn. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1974, no. 1, pp. 51–58.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mikheev, M.N., A Method for Magnetic Thickness Control of Quenched, Carbonized, Nitrated, and Decarbonized Layers on Steel Products, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Tekhn. Nauk, 1943, nos. 5–6, pp. 53–68.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mikheev, M.N., Magnetic Induction Topography in Parts upon Their Local Magnetization by Added Electromagnets, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Tekhn. Nauk, 1943, nos. 3–4, pp. 68–77.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kuznetsov, I.A., Mikheev, M.N., and Tsar’kova, T.P., A Dependence of Indications of a Coercimeter with an Added Electromagnet on the Parameters of Tested Products, Defektoskopiya, 1973, no. 2, pp. 116–120.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mikheev, M.N., Fridman, L.A., Morozova, V.M., Tabachnik, V.P., Bida, G.V., Gorkunov, E.S., and Chernova, G.S., Using Coercimeters with Added Electromagnets in the Inspection of Heavy Steel Products, Defektoskopiya, 1978, no. 8, pp. 47–51.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pyatunin, G.A. and Bida, G.V., Magnetic Testing of Mechanical Properties with Allowance for the Thickness of a Sheet Rolled Stock, Defektoskopiya, 1978, no. 10, pp. 24–28.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mikheev, M.N., Morozova, V.M., Surin, G.V., Tabachnik, V.P., and Fridman, L.A., Studying Dependence of Indications of a Coercimeter with an Added Electromagnet on the Coercive Force and Thickness of Tested Articles, Defektoskopiya, 1970, no. 5, pp. 85–88.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bida, G.V., On the Depth of Magnetization of Bulk Parts by an Added Electromagnet and the Depth of Performance Characteristics Testing, Defektoskopiya, 1999, no. 9, pp. 70–81.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fridman, L.A., Frantsevich, V.M., and Tabachnik, V.P., On the Operation of Ferrotransducer in an Added Coercimeter, Defektoskopiya, 1967, no. 1, pp. 71–77.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bida, G.V. and Mikheev, M.N., The Calculation of a Coercimeter with a Cylindrical Added Electromagnet, Defektoskopiya, 1977, no. 3, pp. 97–101.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Roitman, V.I., Konovalov, O.S., Brusentsova, R.M., Batrak, N.B., and Teneta, M.V., Magnetic Inspection of Mechanical Properties of Pipe Materials by Flux-Gate Coercimeters, Defektoskopiya, 1982, no. 11, pp. 39–45.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mel’gui, M.A., ИMA-2A Pulse Magnetic Analyzer, in Materialy 1-oi Belorusskoi nauchno-tekhn. konf. “Nerazrushayushchie metody i sredstva kontrolya i ikh primenenie v promyshlennosti” (Proc. of I Belarussian Scientific and Technical Conference “Methods and Means for Nondestructive Testing and Their Applying to Production), Minsk: Nauka i Tekhnika, 1973, pp. 81–90.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mel’gui, M.A., Mal’tsev, V.L., Piunov, V.D., and Tsysetskii, I.A., ИMA-4 Pulsed Magnetic Analyzer, Defektoskopiya, 1979, no. 3, pp. 29–32.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mel’gui, M.A., Piunov, V.D., and Tsukerman, V.L., ИMA-4A Pulsed Magnetic Analyzer, Defektoskopiya, 1986, no. 11, pp. 63–67.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Matyuk, V.F., Mel’gui, M.A., Osipov, A.A., et al., On Possibility of Testing Mechanical Properties of 50XΓΦA Steel by the Pulsed Magnetic Method, Defektoskopiya, 2003, no. 9, pp. 47–53 [Rus. J. of Nondestructive Testing (Engl. Transl.), 2003, vol. 39, no. 9, p. 670].Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mel’gui, M.A. and Matyuk, V.F., ИMA-5 Pulsed Magnetic Analyzer, Defektoskopiya, 1979, no. 11, pp. 90–95.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Mel’gui, M.A. and Matyuk, V.F., ИMΠOK-1 Pulse Magnetic Production-Line Controller, Defektoskopiya, 1982, no. 9, pp. 62–66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. V. Bida
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Metal Physics, Ural DivisionRussian Academy of SciencesYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations