Advertisement

Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing

, Volume 40, Issue 11, pp 736–738 | Cite as

Metrological assurance of specimens intended for the tuning of ultrasonic flaw detectors

  • A. A. Shcherbakov
Acoustic Methods
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

A proposal is suggested for improvement of normative documents by refining metrological terminology as it regards the specimens intended for sensitivity tuning.

Keywords

Structural Material Flaw Detector Normative Document Metrological Assurance Ultrasonic Flaw 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    RMG 29-99. Recommendations on Inter-State Standardization. State System for the Assurance of Uniformity of Measurements. Metrology. Terms and Definitions, Minsk: Izd. Standartov, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shcherbakov, A.A., On Figures of Merit in the Metrological Provision of General-Purpose Ultrasonic Flaw Detectors, Defektoskopiya, 2004, no. 3, pp. 22–30 [Rus. J. of Nondestructive Testing (Engl. Transl.), 2004, vol. 40, no. 3, p. 163].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    GOST (State Standard) 23829-85: Acoustical Nondestructive Testing. Terms and Definitions, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ivanov, V.I. and Vlasov, I.E., On Flaw-Detection Methods in Ultrasonic Inspection, Defektoskopiya, 1998, no. 2, pp. 41–46.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shcherbinskii, B.G., Tekhnologiya ultrazvukovogo kontrolya svarnykh soedinenii (Technology for Ultrasonic Inspection of Welded Joints), Moscow: Tisso, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perevalov, S.P., Measurement Assurance of Nondestructive Testing: I. Analysis of Geometrical and Acoustical Characteristics of Erosion Reflectors, Defektoskopiya, 1994, no. 9, pp. 15–31.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perevalov, S.P., Measurement Assurance of Nondestructive Testing: II. Comparative Analysis of Various Methods for the Production of Compact Angular Reflectors, Defektoskopiya, 1994, no. 9, pp. 32–40.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shcherbakov, A.A. and Danilov, V.N., The Choice of the Parameter set and Calibration Tools for Ultrasonic Flaw Detectors under Service Conditions, Defektoskopiya, 1999, no. 5, p. 60.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shcherbakov, A.A., Measurement Assurance of General-Purpose Ultrasonic Flaw Detectors under Manufacturing and Service Conditions, Izmeritel’naya Tekhn., 2004, no. 7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panin, V.I., Baksheev, V.G., and Duzenko, V.A., Methodical and Technical Bases for Measurement Assurance of Ultrasonic Measuring Probes, Defektoskopiya, 1982, no. 1, pp. 22–28.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nuriev, F.N., Perlatov, V.G., Antipin, V.E., et al., Quality Indicators and Measurement Assurance of General-Purpose Ultrasonic Flaw Detectors, Defektoskopiya, 1983, no. 10, pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    GOST (State Standard) 14782-86: Nondestructive Testing. Welds. Ultrasonic Methods, 1987.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    TsM 01.06.05.01-02: Certification Procedure for Plant Standard Specimens for the Tuning of Ultrasonic Echo-Pulse Flaw Detectors, Moscow-Volgodonsk: TsNIITMASh, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gurvich, A.K., More about the Sensitivity of Ultrasonic Testing of Metal Articles, V mire nerazruchayushchego kontrolya, 2001, no. 2, pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Danilov, V.N. and Voronkov, V.A., Plotting of DGS Diagrams, V mire nerazrushayushchego kontrolya, 2001, no. 2, pp. 20–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Shcherbakov
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Scientific and Research Institute for Machine-Building TechnologyMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations