Advertisement

Russian Journal of Genetics

, Volume 41, Issue 10, pp 1151–1156 | Cite as

Cytogenetic Analysis of Spermatozoa in a Patient with Chromosome Constitution 45,X/46,X,r(Y) by Intracytoplasmic Injection into Mouse Oocytes

  • I. D. Fedorova
  • T. V. Kuznetsova
  • J. Van der Elst
  • M. Dhont
  • V. S. Baranov
Human Genetics
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

The chromosome set of human spermatozoa was studied by intracytoplasmic injection into mouse oocytes. A total of 85 metaphase plates of male pronuclei of a patient with chromosome constitution 45,X/46,X,r(Y) and 108 metaphase plates of patients with normal sperm parameters (control group) were examined. The ratio between X- and Y-bearing chromosomes in the 45,X/46,X,r(Y) patient and in the control group did not differ from 1 : 1. A significant increase in the rates of diploidy, hypoploidy, hyperploidy of sex chromosomes, and chromosome structure rearrangements in spermatozoa of the patient in comparison with spermatozoa in the control group was recorded.

Keywords

Cytogenetic Analysis Structure Rearrangement Chromosome Structure Human Spermatozoon Metaphase Plate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Shi, Q. and Martin, R., Aneuploidy in Human Spermatozoa: FISH Analysis in Men with Constitutional Chromosomal Abnormalities, and in Infertile Men, Reproduction, 2001, vol. 121, pp. 655–666.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kalantary, P., Sepehri, H., Behjati, F., et al., Chromosomal Studies in Infertile Men, Russ. J. Genet., 2003, vol. 39, no.3, pp. 342–345.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huynh, T., Mollard, R., and Trounson, A., Selected Genetic Factors Associated with Male Infertility, Hum. Reprod., 2002, vol. 8, no.2, pp. 183–198.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tzancheva, M., Kaneva, R., Kumanov, P., et al., Two Male Patients with Ring Y: Definitions of an Interval in Yq Contributing to Turner Syndrome, J. Med. Genet., 1999, vol. 36, pp. 549–553.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kruger, T.F., Menkveld, K., Stnder, F., et al., Sperm Morphologic Features As a Prognostic Factor of in Vitro Fertilization, Fertil. Steril., 1986, vol. 49, pp. 112–117.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dozortsev, D., De Sutter, P., Rybouchkine, A., et al., Methodology of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in the Human, Assist. Reprod. Rev., 1996, vol. 6, pp. 38–44.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rybouchkin, A., Dozortsev, D., De Sutter, P., et al., Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection of Human Spermatozoa into Mouse Oocytes: A Useful Model to Investigate the Oocyte-Activating Capacity and the Karyotype of the Human Spermatozoa, Hum. Reprod., 1995, vol. 10, no.5, pp. 1130–1135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meditsinskie laboratornye tekhnologii. Spravochnik (Medical Laboratory Techniques: A Handbook), Karpishchenko, A.I., Ed., St. Petersburg: Intermedika, 1999, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McElreavey, K. and Krausz, C., Sex Chromosome Genetics 99: Male Infertility and the Y Chromosome, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 1999, vol. 64, pp. 928–933.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hale, D.W., Is X-Y Recombination Necessary for Spermatocyte Survival during Mammalian Spermatogenesis?, Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 1994, vol. 65, pp. 278–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blanco, J., Farreras, A., Egozcue, J., et al., Meiotic Behavior of the Sex Chromosome in a 45,X/46,X dicr(Y) Patient Whose Semen Was Assessed by Fluorescence Hybridization, Fertil. Steril., 2003, vol. 79, no.3, pp. 913–918.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mroz, K., Hassold, T.J., and Hunt, P., Meiotic Aneuploidy in the XXY Mouse: Evidence That a Compromised Testicular Environment Increases the Incidence of Meiotic Errors, Hum. Reprod., 1999, vol. 14, no.5, pp. 1151–1156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fletters, M., Maxfield, R., and Dawson, D., The Effect of a Ring Chromosome on the Meiotic Segregation of Other Chromosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mol. Gen. Genet., 1995, vol. 249, pp. 309–316.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Egozcue, S., Blanco, J., Vidal, F., and Egozcue, J., Diploid Sperm and Origin of Triploidy, Hum. Reprod., 2002, vol. 17, no.1, pp. 5–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dyban, A.P. and Baranov, V.S., Cytogenetics of Mammalian Embryonic Development, Oxford: Clarendon, 1987.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Metzler-Guillerman, C., Mignon, C., Depetris, D., et al., Bivalent 15 Regularly Associated with Sex Vesicle in Normal Male Meiosis, Chromosome Res., 1999, vol. 7, pp. 369–378.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chandley, A., Asymmetry in Chromosome Pairing: A Major Factor in de Novo Mutation and the Production of Genetic Diseases in Man, J. Med. Genet., 1989, vol. 26, pp. 546–552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Voet, T., Liebe, B., Labaere, C., et al., Telomere-Independent Homologue Pairing and Checkpoint Escape of Accessory Ring Chromosome in Male Mouse Meiosis, J. Cell Biol., 2003, vol. 162, pp. 795–807.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sloter, E.D., Lowe, X., Moore, D.H., et al., Multicolor FISH Analysis of Chromosome Breaks, Duplications, Deletions and Numerical Abnormalities in the Sperm of Healthy Men, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 2000, vol. 67, pp. 862–872.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martine, R., Rademaker, A., Hildebrand, K., et al., Variations of Frequency and Type of Sperm Chromosome Abnormalities among Normal Men, Hum. Genet., 1987, vol. 77, pp. 108–114.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    LeMaire-Adkins, R., Radke, K., and Hunt, P.A., Lack of Checkpoint Control at the Metaphase/Anaphase Transition: A Mechanism of Meiotic Nondisjunction in Mammalian Females, J. Cell Biol., 1997, vol. 139, pp. 1611–1619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abruzzo, M.A. and Hassold, T.J., Etiology of Nondisjunction in Humans, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 1995, vol. 26, pp. 38–47.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pellestor, F., Andreo, B., Arnal, F., et al., Mechanisms of Non-Disjunction in Human Female Meiosis and the Co-Existence of Two Modes of Malsegregation: Evidence by the Karyotyping of 1397 in Vitro Unfertilized Oocytes, Hum. Reprod., 2002, vol. 17, no.8, pp. 2134–2145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee, J.D., Kamiguchi, Y., and Yanagimachi, R., Analysis of Chromosome Constitution of Human Spermatozoa with Normal and Aberrant Head Morphologies after Injection into Mouse Oocytes, Hum. Reprod., 1996, vol. 11, no.9, pp. 1942–1946.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Devillard, F., Metzler-Guilleman, C., Pelletier, R., et al., Polyploidy in Large-Head Sperm: FISH Study of Three Cases, Hum. Reprod., 2002, vol. 17, no.5, pp. 1292–1298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Viville, S., Mollard, R., Bach, M.-L., et al., Do Morphology Abnormalities Reflect Chromosomal Aneuploidies?, Hum. Reprod., 2000, vol. 15, no.12, pp. 2563–2566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK "Nauka/Interperiodica" 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. D. Fedorova
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. V. Kuznetsova
    • 1
  • J. Van der Elst
    • 3
  • M. Dhont
    • 3
  • V. S. Baranov
    • 1
  1. 1.Ott Institute of Obstetrics and GynecologyRussian Academy of Medical SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Department of Genetics and BreedingSt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Infertility Center, Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital of GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations