We use the framework of cognitive resources to investigate how students construct understanding of a complex physics topic, namely, a photovoltaic cell. By observing students as they learn about how a solar cell functions, we identified over 60 distinct resources that learners may activate while thinking about photovoltaic cells. We classify these resources into three main types: phenomenological primitives, conceptual resources, and epistemological resources. Furthermore, we found a pattern that suggests that when students make conceptual breakthroughs they may be more likely to activate combinations of resources of different types in concert, especially if a resource from each of the three categories is used. This pattern suggests that physics instructors should encourage students to activate multiple types of prior knowledge during the learning process. This can result from instructors deliberately and explicitly connecting new knowledge to students’ prior experience both in and outside the formal physics classroom, as well as allowing students to reflect metacognitively on how the new knowledge fits into their existing understanding of the natural world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bing, T. J., & Redish, E. F. (2009). Analyzing problem solving using math in physics: epistemological framing via warrants. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5(2), 020108.
Brown, D. E., & Hammer, D. (2008). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 127–154). New York: Routledge.
Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66–71.
Conlin, L. D., Gupta, A., & Hammer, D. (2010). Framing and resource activation: bridging the cognitive-situative divide using a dynamic unit of cognitive analysis. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 32(32), 19–24.
DiSessa, A. A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: a study of knowledge-based learning. Cognitive Science, 6(1), 37–75.
DiSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225.
DiSessa, A. A. (2015). Alternative conceptions and P-prims. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 34–37). Dordrecht: Springer.
Disessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155–1191.
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119.
Engelhardt, P. V., Corpuz, E. G., Ozimek, D. J., & Rebello, N. S. (2004, September). The teaching experiment—what it is and what it isn’t. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 720, No. 1, pp. 157–160). AIP.
Gupta, A., Hammer, D., & Redish, E. F. (2010). The case for dynamic models of learners’ ontologies in physics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 285–321.
Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985a). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1056–1065.
Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985b). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043–1055.
Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 151–183.
Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or p-prims: how may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97–127.
Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S52–S59.
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 53–90.
Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89–119). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Harrer, B. W., Flood, V. J., & Wittmann, M. C. (2013). Productive resources in students’ ideas about energy: an alternative analysis of Watts’ original interview transcripts. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 9(2), 023101.
Helm, H. (1980). Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students. Physics Education, 15(2), 92–105.
Heron, P. R., Shaffer, P. S., & McDermott, L. C. (2004, April). Research as a guide to improving student learning: an example from introductory physics. In Invention and Impact, Proceedings of a Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement Conference, AAAS.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757–792.
Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2016). Identifying pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions and conceptual difficulties about geometrical optics. European Journal of Physics, 37(4), 045705.
Lai, T. L., & Land, S. M. (2009). Supporting reflection in online learning environments. In M. Orey et al. (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 34, pp. 141–154). US: Springer.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Lising, L., & Elby, A. (2005). The impact of epistemology on learning: a case study from introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 73(4), 372–382.
Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57–68.
May, D. B., & Etkina, E. (2002). College physics students’ epistemological self- reflection and its relationship to conceptual learning. American Journal of Physics, 70, 1249–1258.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Understanding conceptual change: a commentary. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: issues in theory and practice (pp. 101–111). Netherlands: Springer.
McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 248(4), 122–131.
McDermott, L. C. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today, 37, 24–32.
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.
Nasr, R., Hall, S. R., & Garik, P. (2003, November). Student misconceptions in signals and systems and their origins. In Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003 33rd Annual (Vol. 1, pp. T2E-23). IEEE.
Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Cornell University Press.
Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405–435.
Redish, E. F. (2014). Oersted lecture 2013: how should we think about how our students think? American Journal of Physics, 82, 537–551.
Richards, A. J. (2013). How students combine resources to build understanding of complex topics (Doctoral dissertation), Retrieved from ProQuest, LLC.
Richards, A. J., & Etkina, E. (2013). Kinaesthetic learning activities and learning about solar cells. Physics Education, 48(5), 578–585.
Roschelle, J. (1997). Learning in interactive environments: prior knowledge and new experience. In J. Falk & L. Dierking (Eds.), Public institutions for public learning (pp. 37–54). Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
Sayre, E. C., & Wittmann, M. C. (2008). Plasticity of intermediate mechanics students’ coordinate system choice. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 4(2), 020105.
Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2009). Student behavior and epistemological framing: examples from collaborative active-learning activities in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2), 147–174.
Schneps, M., & Sadler, P. M. (1989). A private universe [Video]. Santa Monica, CA: Pyramid Film and Video.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: MacMillan.
Smith III, J. P., Disessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: a constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.
Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146.
Taber, K. S. (2008). Conceptual resources for learning science: issues of transience and grain-size in cognition and cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1027–1053.
Taber, K. S., de Trafford, T., & Quail, T. (2006). Conceptual resources for constructing the concepts of electricity: the role of models, analogies and imagination. Physics Education, 41(2), 155–160.
Thaden-Koch, T. C. (2003). A coordination class analysis of college students’ judgments about animated motion. (Doctoral dissertation), Retrieved from University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
Wittmann, M. C. (2002). The object coordination class applied to wave pulses: analysing student reasoning in wave physics. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 97–118.
Wittmann, M. C. (2006). Using resource graphs to represent conceptual change. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2(2), 020105.
Zull, J. E. (2002). The art of changing the brain: enriching teaching by exploring the biology of learning. LLC: Stylus Publishing.
We are indebted to David Hammer for his help with the manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
Richards, A.J., Jones, D.C. & Etkina, E. How Students Combine Resources to Make Conceptual Breakthroughs. Res Sci Educ 50, 1119–1141 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9725-8
- Cognitive resources
- Advanced undergraduate
- Solar cells