Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 345–367 | Cite as

How Should Energy Be Defined Throughout Schooling?

  • Manuel Bächtold
Article

Abstract

The question of how to teach energy has been renewed by recent studies focusing on the learning and teaching progressions for this concept. In this context, one question has been, for the most part, overlooked: how should energy be defined throughout schooling? This paper addresses this question in three steps. We first identify and discuss two main approaches in physics concerning the definition of energy, one claiming there is no satisfactory definition and taking conservation as a fundamental property, and the other based on Rankine’s definition of energy as the capacity of a system to produce changes. We then present a study concerning how energy is actually defined throughout schooling in the case of France by analyzing national programs, physics textbooks, and the answers of teachers to a questionnaire. This study brings to light a consistency problem in the way energy is defined across school years: in primary school, an adapted version of Rankine’s definition is introduced and conservation is ignored; in high school, conservation is introduced and Rankine’s definition is ignored. Finally, we address this consistency problem by discussing possible teaching progressions. We argue in favor of the use of Rankine’s definition throughout schooling: at primary school, it is a possible substitute to students’ erroneous conceptions; at secondary school, it might help students become aware of the unifying role of energy and thereby overcome the compartmentalization problem.

Keywords

Definition of energy Teaching progression Conservation of energy Rankine 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Yaron Lehavi, Valérie Munier, Muriel Guedj, David Cross and André Ranquet for their helpful comments on the manuscript and their suggestions.

References

  1. Arons, A. (1999). Development of energy concepts in introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 67(12), 1063–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bächtold, M. & Guedj, M. (2014). Teaching energy informed by the history and epistemology of the conceptwith implications for teacher education. In M. Matthews (ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (p. 211–243). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Bächtold, M., Munier, V., Guedj, M., Lerouge, A., & Ranquet, A. (2014). Quelle progression dans l’enseignement de l’énergie de l’école au lycée ? Une analyse des programmes et des manuels. Recherches en Didactique des Sciences et des Technologies, 10, 63–92.Google Scholar
  4. Bächtold, M. & Munier, V. (2014). Enseigner le concept d’énergie en physique et éduquer à l’énergie: rupture ou continuité. Skholê, 18(1), 21-29.Google Scholar
  5. Bunge, M. (2000). Energy: between physics and metaphysics. Science & Education, 9, 457–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coelho, R. (2014). On the concept of energy: eclecticism and rationality. Science & Education, 23, 1361–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colonnese, D., Heron, P., Michelini, M., Santi, L., & Stefanel, A. (2012). A vertical pathway for teaching and learning the concept of energy. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 21–50.Google Scholar
  8. Cotignola, M., Bordogna, C., Punte, G. & Cappannini, O. (2002). Difficulties in learning thermodynamic concepts: are they linked to the historical development of this field?. Science & Education, 11, 279–291.Google Scholar
  9. Doménech, J.-L., Gil-Pérez, D., Gras-Marti, A., Guisasola, J., Martínez-Torregrosa, J., Salinas, J., Trumper, R., Valdés, P., & Vilches, A. (2007). Teaching of energy issues: a debate proposal for a global reorientation. Science & Education, 16, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Driver, R., & Warrington, L. (1985). Students’ use of the principle of energy conservation in problem situations. Physics Education, 5, 171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duit, R. (1981). Understanding energy as a conserved quantity. European Journal of Science Education, 3(3), 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duit, R. (1984). Learning the energy concept in school: empirical results from the Philippines and West Germany. Physics Education, 19, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duit, R. (1987). Should energy be introduced as something quasi-material? International Journal of Science Education, 9, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duit, R. (2014). Teaching and learning the physics energy concept. In R. Chen, A., Eisenkraft, D., Fortus, J.,Krajcik, J., Nordine & A. Scheff (Eds.) Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (p. 67–85). Heidelberg, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Eisenkraft, A., Nordine, J., Chen, R., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Neumann, K. & Scheff, A. (2014). Introduction: why focus on energy instruction? In R. Chen, A., Eisenkraft, D., Fortus, J., Krajcik, J., Nordine & A. Scheff (Eds.) Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (p. 1–11). Heidelberg, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Elkana, Y. (1974). The discovery of the conservation of energy. London: Hutchinson Educational.Google Scholar
  17. Feynman, R. (1963). The Feynman lectures on physics, vol. I. Mainly mechanics, radiation, and heat. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  18. Fortus, D., Sutherland Adams, L., Krajcik, J., & Reiser, B. (2015). Assessing the role of curriculum coherence in student learning about energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1408–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galili, I., & Lehavi, Y. (2006). Definitions of physical concepts: a study of physics teachers’ knowledge and views. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 521–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilbert, J., & Pope, M. (1986). Small group discussions about conceptions in science: a case study. Research in Science and Technological Education, 4, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldring, H., & Osborne, J. (1994). Students’ difficulties with energy and related concepts. Physics Education, 29(1), 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harman, P. (1982). Energy, force and matter: the conceptual development of nineteenth-century physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hobson, A. (2004). Energy and work: the meaning of energy. The Physics Teacher, 42(5), 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jewett, J. (2008a). Energy and the confused student II: systems. The Physics Teacher, 46(2), 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jewett, J. (2008b). Energy and the confused student III: language. The Physics Teacher, 46(3), 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jewett, J. (2008c). Energy and the confused student IV: a global approach to energy. The Physics Teacher, 46(4), 210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuhn, T. (1959). Energy conservation as an example of simultaneous discovery. In M. Clagett (Ed.), Critical Problems in the History of Science (pp. 321–356). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lacy, S., Tobin, R.G., Wiser, M. & Crissman, S. (2014). Looking through the energy lens: a proposed teaching progression for energy in grades 3-5. In R. Chen, A., Eisenkraft, D., Fortus, J., Krajcik, J., Nordine & A. Scheff (Eds.) Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (p. 241–265). Heidelberg, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, H.-S., & Liu, O. (2010). Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: the knowledge integration perspective. Science Education, 94(4), 665–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehavi, Y., Eylon, B., Hazan, A., Bamberger, Y. & Weizman, A. (2012). Focusing on changes in teaching about energy. Proceedings of the World Conference on Physics Education 2012, WCPE. Ankara: Pegem AkademiGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis, E. & Linn, M. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 657-677.Google Scholar
  32. Lijnse, P. (1990). Energy between the life-world of pupils and the world of physics. Science Education, 74(5), 571–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu, X., & McKeough, A. (2005). Developmental growth in students’ concept of energy: analysis of selected items from the TIMSS database. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Margenau, H. (1950). The nature of physical reality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  35. McIldowie, E. (2004). A trial of two energies. Physics Education, 39(2), 212–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Millar, D. (2005). Teaching about energy. Department of Educational Studies: research paper 2005/11. Retrieved from: www.fisica.uniud.it/~stefanel/PFDS/EnergiaProblappr/Millar.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
  37. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  38. Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W., & Fischer, H. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 162–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: for states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  40. Nordine, J., Krajcik, J., & Fortus, D. (2011). Transforming energy instruction in middle school to support intergrated understanding and future learning. Science Education, 95(4), 670–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Papadouris, N., & Constantinou, C. (2011). A philosophically informed teaching proposal on the topic of energy for students aged 11–14. Science & Education, 20, 961–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Papadouris, N., & Constantinou, C. (2016). Investigating middle school students’ ability to develop energy as a framework for analyzing simple physical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 119–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Poincaré, H. (1902). La science et l’hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion. (1968).Google Scholar
  44. Rankine, W. (1855). Outlines of the science of energetics. The Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal, 2(3), 121–141. Accessed July-October 1855.Google Scholar
  45. Sexl, R. (1981). Some observations concerning the teaching of the energy concept. European Journal of Science Education, 3(3), 285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, C. (2003). Force, energy, and thermodynamics. In M. J. Nye (Ed.), The Cambridge history of science: the modern physical and mathematical sciences (pp. 289–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Solomon, J. (1983). Learning about energy: how pupils think in two domains. European Journal of Science Education, 5, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Solomon, J. (1985). Teaching the conservation of energy. Physics Education, 20, 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trellu J.-L. & Toussaint J. (1986). La conservation, un grand principe. Aster, 2, 43–87.Google Scholar
  50. Trumper, R. (1990). Being constructive: an alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept, part one. International Journal of Science Education, 12(4), 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trumper, R. (1991). Being constructive: an alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept, part two. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Trumper, R. (1993). Children’s energy concepts: a cross-age study. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Huis, C., & van den Berg, E. (1993). Teaching energy: a systems approach. Physics Education, 28, 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vince, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2012). Enseigner l’énergie en physique à partir de la question sociale du défi énergétique. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 89–124.Google Scholar
  55. Warren, J. (1982). The nature of energy. European Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 295–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Warren, J. (1991). The teaching of energy. Physics Education, 26(1), 8–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watts, D. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Didactique, Éducation, Formation, EA 3749Université de Montpellier and UPVMMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations