Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 181–206 | Cite as

Teachers’ Mastery Goals: Using a Self-Report Survey to Study the Relations between Teaching Practices and Students’ Motivation for Science Learning

Article

Abstract

Employing achievement goal theory (Ames Journal of Educational psychology, 84(3), 261–271, 1992), we explored science teachers’ instruction and its relation to students’ motivation for science learning and school culture. Based on the TARGETS framework (Patrick et al. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 35–58, 2001) and using data from 95 teachers, we developed a self-report survey assessing science teachers’ usage of practices that emphasize mastery goals. We then used this survey and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses to study the relations between 35 science teachers’ mastery goals in each of the TARGETS dimensions, the decline in their grade-level 5–8 students’ (N = 1.356) classroom and continuing motivation for science learning, and their schools’ mastery goal structure. The findings suggest that adolescents’ declining motivation for science learning results in part from a decreasing emphasis on mastery goals by schools and science teachers. Practices that relate to the nature of tasks and to student autonomy emerged as most strongly associated with adolescents’ motivation and its decline with age.

Keywords

Science teachers Motivation Goal orientation Goal structure Continuing motivation Classroom engagement School culture 

Supplementary material

11165_2016_9565_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 15 kb)
11165_2016_9565_MOESM2_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Table S1 (DOCX 16 kb)
11165_2016_9565_MOESM3_ESM.docx (35 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 35 kb)

References

  1. Alternative Education Resource Organization. (2013). From http://www.educationrevolution.org/ store/about/.
  2. Ames, C. (1992a). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327–348). Hillsdale, NJ Hove and London: Lawrence Arlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Ames, C. (1992b). Classroom: goals, structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(8), 811–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: the role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Avraamidou, L., & Roth, W. M. (Eds.) (2016). Intersections of formal and informal science. Evanston: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Azevedo, F. S. (2011). Lines of practice: a practice-centered theory of interest relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 147–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Kaplan, A. (2005). Motivational influences on transfer of problem-solving strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2014). “What comes to mind when you think of science? The perfumery!”: documenting science-related cultural learning pathways across contexts and timescales. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 260–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryk, A., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioral research: applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Carlone, H. B., Scott, C. M., & Lowder, C. (2014). Becoming (less) scientific: a longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 836–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, K. S. (2014). Eliciting engagement in the high school classroom: A mixed-Mmethods examination of teaching practices. American Educational Research Journal 51(2), 363–402.Google Scholar
  14. Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., & Ellenbogen, K. (2003). Policy statement of the “informal science education” ad hoc committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 108–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliot, A. J., McCregor, H., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: a mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falk, J. H., Staus, N., Dierking, L. D., Penuel, W., Wyld, J., & Bailey, D. (2015). Understanding youth STEM interest pathways within a single community: The Synergies project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(4):2016.Google Scholar
  17. Feder, M. A., Shouse, A. W., Lewenstein, B., & Bell, P. (Eds.) (2009). Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fortus, D. (2014). Attending to affect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 821–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fortus, D., & Vedder‐Weiss, D. (2014). Measuring students' continuing motivation for science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(4), 497–522.Google Scholar
  20. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galton, M. (2009). Moving to secondary school: initial encounters and their effects. Perspectives on Education, 2 (Primary-secondary Transfer in Science), 5–21. Retrieved from www.wellcome.ac.uk/perspectives
  22. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: it is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychological Review, 19(2), 141–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karabenick, S. A., Woolley, M. E., Friedel, J. M., Ammon, B. V., Blazevski, J., Bonney, C. R., et al. (2007). Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: do they think what we mean? Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lüftenegger, M., van de Schoot, R., Schober, B., Finsterwald, M., & Spiel, C. (2014). Promotion of students’ mastery goal orientations: does TARGET work? Educational Psychology, 34, 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maehr, M. L. (1976). Continuing motivation: an analysis of a seldom considered educational outcome. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  30. Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Morin, A. J. S., Abduljabbar, A. S., et al. (2012). Classroom climate and contextual effects: conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 106–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. C. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 514–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meece, J. L., Herman, P., & McCombs, B. L. (2003). Relations of learner-centered teaching practices to adolescents’ achievement goals. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(4), 457–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Midgley, C., Anderman, E. M., & Hicks, L. (1995). Differences between elementary and middle school teachers and students: a goal theory approach. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E. M., Anderman, L. H., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  37. Miller, A. D., & Murdock, T. B. (2007). Modeling latent true scores to determine the utility of aggregate student perceptions as classroom indicators in HLM: The case of classroom goal structures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(1), 83–104..Google Scholar
  38. Mucherah, W. (2008). Classroom climate and students’ goal structures in high-school biology classrooms in Kenya. Learning Environment Research, 11(1), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nolen, S. B., & Haladyna, T. M. (1990a). Motivation and studying in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Keefe, P. A., Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2013). Shaping achievement goal orientations in a mastery-structured environment and concomitant changes in related contingencies of self-worth. Motivation and Emotion, 37(1), 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. A report to the Nuffield Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/Sci_Ed_in_Europe_Report_Final.pdf.
  42. Osborne, J. A., Simon, S. B., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pascarella, E., Walberg, H., Junker, L., & Heartel, G. (1981). Continuing motivation in science for early and late adolescents. American Educational Research Journal, 18(4), 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Patrick, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). What do students think about when evaluating their classroom’s mastery goal structure? An examination of young adolescents’ explanations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(2), 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patrick, H., & Yoon, C. (2004). Early adolescents’ motivation during science investigation. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Patrick, H., Ryan, R. M., Anderman, L. H., Middleton, M., Linnenbrink, E. A., Hruda, L. Z., et al. (1997). OPAL observing patterns of adaptive learning: a protocol for classroom observations. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  47. Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, R. M., Edelin, K. C., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Analysis of the decline in interest towards school science and technology from grades 5 through 11. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 784–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roeser, R. W., Marachi, R., & Gehlbach, H. (2002). A goal theory perspective on teachers’ professional identities and the contexts of teaching. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 205–241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: theory, research and application. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey and Columbus, Ohio: Pearson.Google Scholar
  51. Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tal, T., & Dierking, L. D. (2014). Learning science in everyday life. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 251–259.Google Scholar
  54. Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M. Q., Anderman, E. M., Kang, Y., et al. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ report of avoidance strategies in mathematics: a multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Urdan, T. C., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 524–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vedder-Weiss, D. (2017). Teaching higher and lower in mastery goals structure: The perspective of students. Elementary School journal. In press.Google Scholar
  57. Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199–216.Google Scholar
  58. Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2012). Students’ declining motivation to learn science: a follow up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1057–1095.Google Scholar
  59. Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2013). School, teacher, peer’s and parents’ goals emphases and adolescents’ motivation to learn science in and out of school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 952–988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeershebaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Science TeachingWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations