Research in Science Education

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 91–112 | Cite as

Secondary Science Teachers’ and Students’ Involvement in a Primary School Community of Science Practice: How It Changed Their Practices and Interest in Science

  • Anne Forbes
  • Keith Skamp


MyScience is a primary science education initiative in which being in a community of practice is integral to the learning process. In this initiative, stakeholder groups—primary teachers, primary students and mentors—interact around the ‘domain’ of ‘investigating scientifically’. This paper builds on three earlier publications and interprets the findings of the views of four secondary science teachers and five year 9 secondary science students who were first-timer participants—as mentors—in MyScience. Perceptions of these mentors’ interactions with primary students were analysed using attributes associated with both ‘communities of practice’ and the ‘nature of science’. Findings reveal that participation in MyScience changed secondary science teachers’ views and practices about how to approach the teaching of science in secondary school and fostered primary–secondary links. Year 9 students positively changed their views about secondary school science and confidence in science through participation as mentors. Implications for secondary science teaching and learning through participation in primary school community of science practice settings are discussed.


Community of practice Science education Secondary school Secondary science teacher Secondary science student Views of science Confidence in science Interest in science 


  1. Anfara, V., Brown, K., & Mangione, T. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28–38. doi: 10.3102/0013189X031007028.
  2. Borg, T. (2009). The tenacity of teachers: the evolution of a teacher community of practice. Bathurst: Unpublished doctoral thesis. Charles Sturt University, Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Carlone, H., Haun-Frank, J., & Kimmel, S. (2010). Tempered radicals: elementary teachers’ narratives of teaching science within and against prevailing meanings of schooling. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(4), 941–965. doi: 10.1007/s11422-010-9282-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darby, L. (2005). Science students’ perceptions of engaging pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 35(4), 425–445. doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-4488-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feasey, R. (2012). Thinking and working scientifically. In K. Skamp (Ed.), Teaching primary science constructively (4th ed., pp. 55–98). Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Fensham, P. (2008). Science education policy-making: eleven emerging issues: UNESCO. Retrieved December 10, 2013 from
  7. Forbes, A., & McCloughan, G. (2010). Increasing student participation in science investigations in primary schools: the MyScience initiative. Teaching Science, 56(2), 24–30.Google Scholar
  8. Forbes, A., & Skamp, K. (2013). Knowing and learning about science in primary school ‘communities of science practice’: the views of participating scientists in the MyScience initiative. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 1005–1028. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9295-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forbes, A., & Skamp, K. (2014). “Because we weren’t actually teaching them, we thought they weren’t learning”: primary teacher perspectives from the MyScience initiative. Research in Science Education, 44(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1007/s11165-013-9367-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Girod, M., & Twyman, T. (2009). Comparing the added value of blended science and literacy curricula to inquiry-based science curricula in two 2nd-grade classrooms. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(3), 13–32. doi: 10.1007/BF03174720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodrum, D. & Rennie, L. (2007). Australian school science education: national action plan 2008–2012, Volume 1, The National Action Plan. Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra. Retrieved January 16, 2014 from
  12. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015005005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hackling, M. (2005). Working scientifically: implementing and assessing in science. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Hackling, M. (2014). The status of STEM education in Australia: challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the Australasian Science Education Conference, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  15. Hanrahan, M. (1998). The effect of learning environment factors on students’ motivation and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 737–753. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hume, A. (2009). Authentic scientific inquiry and school science. Teaching Science, 55(2), 35–41.Google Scholar
  17. Jeans, B., & Farnsworth, I. (1993). Post-primary science teachers’ perceptions of primary science education. Research in Science Education, 23(1), 118–125. doi: 10.1007/02357052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelly, G. (2008). Learning science: discursive practices. In A.-M. de Mejia & M. Martin-Jones (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 3: discourse and education (pp. 329–340). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_82.Google Scholar
  19. Koliba, C., & Gajda, R. (2009). “Communities of practice” as an analytical construct: implications for theory and practice. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(2), 97–135. doi: 10.1080/01900690802385192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. London: Cambridge University. doi: 10.1017/9780511815355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lederman, N. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359. doi: 10.1002/3660290404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levitt, K. (2001). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1002/sce.1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Logan, M., & Skamp, K. (2008). Engaging students in science across the primary secondary interface: listening to the students’ voice. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 501–527. doi: 10.1007/11165-007-9063-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Logan, M., & Skamp, K. (2013). The impact of teachers and their science teaching on students’ ‘science interest’: a four-year study. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2879–2904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–613. doi: 10.1080/09500690500339621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. OECD. (2013). PISA 2015. Draft Science Framework. Retrieved June 20, 2014 from:
  27. Office of the Chief Scientist. (2012). Mathematics, engineering and science in the national interest. Retrieved January 17, 2014 from
  28. Opfer, D. V., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. doi: 10.3102/0034654311413609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Rennie, L. (2005). Science awareness and scientific literacy. Teaching Science, 51(1), 10–14.Google Scholar
  32. Rennie, L. J. (2007). Learning science outside of school. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 125–167). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  33. Rennie, L. J. (2010). Evaluation of the science by doing stage one professional learning approach. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  34. Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31–56). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  35. Skamp, K. (2007). Conceptual learning in the primary and middle years. The interplay of heads, hearts and hand-on science: more than just a mantra. Teaching Science, 53(3), 18–22.Google Scholar
  36. Skamp, K. (2012). Teaching primary science: trial teacher feedback on the implementation of primary connections and the 5E model. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  37. Stringer, E. (2013). Action research (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: how teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tan, E., & Barton, A. (2007). From peripheral to central, the story of Melanie’s metamorphosis in an urban middle school science class. Science Education, 92(4), 567–590. doi: 10.1002/Fsce.20253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved January 17, 2014 from
  41. Van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience (2nd ed.). Canada: The Althouse.Google Scholar
  42. Wals, A., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. (2014). Convergence between science and environmental education. Science, 344, 583–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Watkins, R. (2010). Primary-secondary transfer: a science perspective. Primary Science, 111, 33–34.Google Scholar
  44. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice—learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University. doi: 10.1017/O9780511803932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wenger-Trayner, E. (2013). What is a community of practice? Retrieved January 17, 2014 from
  46. Zoller, U., & Nahum, T. (2012). From teaching to KNOW to learning to THINK in science education. In B. J. Fraser et al. (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 209–229). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education and ArtsAustralian Catholic UniversityStrathfieldAustralia
  2. 2.School of EducationSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations