Factors Influencing Science Content Accuracy in Elementary Inquiry Science Lessons
- 1.1k Downloads
Elementary teachers face increasing demands to engage children in authentic science process and argument while simultaneously preparing them with knowledge of science facts, vocabulary, and concepts. This reform is particularly challenging due to concerns that elementary teachers lack adequate science background to teach science accurately. This study examined 81 in-classroom inquiry science lessons for preservice education majors and their cooperating teachers to determine the accuracy of the science content delivered in elementary classrooms. Our results showed that 74 % of experienced teachers and 50 % of student teachers presented science lessons with greater than 90 % accuracy. Eleven of the 81 lessons (9 preservice, 2 cooperating teachers) failed to deliver accurate science content to the class. Science content accuracy was highly correlated with the use of kit-based resources supported with professional development, a preference for teaching science, and grade level. There was no correlation between the accuracy of science content and some common measures of teacher content knowledge (i.e., number of college science courses, science grades, or scores on a general science content test). Our study concluded that when provided with high quality curricular materials and targeted professional development, elementary teachers learn needed science content and present it accurately to their students.
KeywordsElementary education Inquiry science Preservice students Science content accuracy Science content knowledge
This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (Grant No. ESI-0455685). The authors would like to acknowledge the generous assistance of Sally Beauman and Elaine Mangiante who assisted us with logistics of the data collection.
- Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education (pp. 31–54). Mauwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates and Association for Science Teacher Education (ASTE).Google Scholar
- Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Subject-matter knowledge and science teaching: a pragmatic perspective. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice, Vol. 2, pp. 115–143). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: teacher leaning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.Google Scholar
- Colburn, A. (1997). How to make lab activities more open ended. California Science Teachers Association. CSTA Journal, 1997, 4–6. Fall.Google Scholar
- Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8. The National Research Council. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics. Florida: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
- Michaels, S., Shouse, A. W., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2008). Ready, set, science! Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: a guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Nilsson, P., & van Driel, J. (2010). How will we understand what we teach?—Primary student teacher’s perceptions of their development of knowledge and attitudes towards physics. Research in Science Education. doi: 10.1007/s11165-010-9179-0.
- Overstreet, C. (2002). HRI science assessment instrument. Chapel Hill: Horizon Research Inc.Google Scholar
- Schulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.Google Scholar
- Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research Inc. www.horizon-research.com, pp. 356
- Yoon, H.-G., Joung, Y. J., & Kim, M. (2011). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: difficulties on and under the scene [Electronic version]. Research in Science Education. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9212-y.