Research in Science Education

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 439–467 | Cite as

High School Student Participation in Scientific Research Apprenticeships: Variation in and Relationships Among Student Experiences and Outcomes

  • Stephen R. Burgin
  • Troy D. Sadler
  • Mary Jo Koroly


Research apprenticeships for secondary students provide authentic contexts for learning science in which students engage in scientific investigations with practicing scientists in working laboratory groups. Student experiences in these research apprenticeships vary depending on the individual nature of the laboratory in which students have been placed. This study explores potential relationships among student experiences in apprenticeship contexts and desired student outcomes (e.g. science content knowledge, understandings of nature of science, and aspirations for science oriented career plans). The following two research questions guided the study: How do participant experiences in and outcomes resulting from an authentic research program for high school students vary? How does variation in participant experiences in an authentic research program relate to participant outcomes? Primary data sources were student and mentor interviews in addition to student generated concept maps. Results indicated that the greatest variance in student experiences existed in the categories of collaboration, epistemic involvement, and understandings of the significance of research results. The greatest variation in desired student outcomes was observed in student understandings of nature of science and in students’ future science plans. Results suggested that collaboration and interest in the project were experience aspects most likely to be related to desired outcomes. Implications for the design of research apprenticeships for secondary students are discussed.


Apprenticeship Authenticity Nature of science Research experience Science careers Scientific research 


  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naamon, R., Hofstein, A., et al. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abraham, L. M. (2002). What do high school science students gain from field-based research apprenticeship programs? The Clearing House., 75, 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issue related to the Science Apprenticeship Camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 70–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleicher, R. E. (1996). High school students learning science in university research laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1115–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 34–41.Google Scholar
  7. Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, L., Coletta, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooley, W. W., & Bassett, R. D. (1961). Evaluation and follow-up study of a summer science and mathematics program for talented secondary school students. Science Education, 45, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research 3e: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, D. D. (1999). April). The research apprenticeship program: Promoting careers in biomedical sciences and the health professions for minority populations. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Monreal, Ontario.Google Scholar
  12. Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (1995). The place of investigations in practical work in the UK national curriculum for science. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feldman, A., Divoll, K., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2009). Research education of new scientists: implications for science teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 442–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. France, B., & Bay, J. L. (2010). Questions students ask: Bridging the gap between scientists and students in a research institute classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1996). Practical work: Its role in the understanding of evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grindstaff, K., & Richmond, G. (2008). Learners’ perceptions of the role of peers in a research experience: Implications for the apprenticeship process, scientific inquiry, and collaborative work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haigh, M., France, B., & Forret, M. (2005). Is ‘doing science’ in New Zealand classrooms an expression of scientific inquiry? International Journal of Science Education, 27, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hay, K. E., & Barab, S. A. (2001). Constructivism in practice: A comparison and contrast of apprenticeship and constructionist learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 281–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal and professional development. Science Education, 91, 36–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King, D., Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2008). Making connections: Learning and teaching chemistry in context. Research in Science Education, 38, 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). View of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis, J. R., Kotur, M. S., Butt, O., Kulcarni, S., Riley, A. A., Ferrell, N., et al. (2002). Biotechnology apprenticeship for secondary-level students: Teaching advanced cell culture techniques for research. Cell Biology Education, 1, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Krull, J. A. (1998). Can we be scientists too? Secondary students’ perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neber, H., & Anton, M. (2008). Promoting pre-experimental activities in high-school chemistry: Focusing on the role of students’ epistemic questions. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1801–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2007). Theoretical Origins of Concept Maps, How to Construct Them, and Uses in Education. Reflecting Education, 3, 29–42.Google Scholar
  33. Rice, D. C., Ryan, J. M., & Samson, S. M. (1998). Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: must different methods compete? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1103–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richmond, G., & Kurth, L. (1999). Moving from outside to inside: High school students’ use of apprenticeships as vehicles for entering the culture and practice of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 677–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 799–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Russell, S.H. (2006). Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate research opportunities: Draft synthesis report.Google Scholar
  37. Ryder, J., & Leach, J. (1999). University science students’ experiences of investigative project work and their images of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 945–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sadler, T. S., Burgin, S., McKinney, L. L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning Science through Research Apprenticeships: A Critical Review of the Literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 235–256.Google Scholar
  39. Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seymour, E., Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three year study. Science Education, 88, 493–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: Predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1065–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2005). Evaluating the impact of science-enrichment programs on adolescents’ science motivation and confidence: The splashdown effect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2005). Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: implications for scoring, interpretation, and use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 166–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen R. Burgin
    • 1
    • 3
  • Troy D. Sadler
    • 1
  • Mary Jo Koroly
    • 2
  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.College of Medicine & Center for Precollegiate Education & TrainingUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.School of Teaching and Learning, College of EducationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations