Research in Science Education

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 329–351 | Cite as

Teachers’ Inclusive Strategies to Accommodate 5th Grade Pupils’ Crossing of Cultural Borders in Two Greek Multicultural Science Classrooms



The demographic changes in Greek schools underline the need for reconsidering the way in which migrant pupils move from their everyday culture into the culture of school science (a process known as “cultural border crossing”). Migrant pupils might face difficulties when they attempt to transcend cultural borders and this may influence their progress in science as well as the construction of suitable academic identities as a means of promoting scientific literacy. In the research we present in this paper, adopting the socioculturally driven thesis that learning can be viewed and studied as a meaning-making, collaborative inquiry process, we implemented an action research program (school year 2008–2009) in cooperation with two teachers, in a primary school of Athens with 85% migrant pupils. We examined whether the two teachers, who became gradually acquainted with cross-cultural pedagogy during the project, act towards accommodating the crossing of cultural borders by implementing a variety of inclusive strategies in science teaching. Our findings reveal that both teachers utilized suitable cross-border strategies (strategies concerning the establishment of a collaborative inquiry learning environment, and strategies that were in accordance with a cross-border pedagogy) to help students cross smoothly from their “world” to the “world of science”. A crucial key to the teachers’ expertise was their previous participation in collaborative action research (school years 2004–2006), in which they analyzed their own discourse practices during science lessons in order to establish more collaborative inquiry environments.


Science teaching Collaborative inquiry Teachers’ inclusive strategies Primary school migrant pupils Discourse analysis 



We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.


  1. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 26, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science & Education, 85, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Applebee, A. (1996). Curriculum as conversation. Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1995). Communication and learning revisited. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, B. A. (2004). Discursive identity: assimilation into the culture of science classroom and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. César, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (Eds.). (2009). Social interactions in multicultural settings. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Cobern, W. W., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1998). Cultural aspects of learning science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 39–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Coelho, E. (1998). Teaching and learning in multicultural schools: An integrated approach. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is “another world”: relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science & Education, 79(3), 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gee, P. J. (1999). An introdauction to discourse analysis. Theory and method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Gee, J. P., & Green, L. J. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: a methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.Google Scholar
  13. Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Giroux, H. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hanrahan, M. (2002). Applying CDA to the analysis of productive hybrid discourses in science classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual paper conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Brisbane, Queensland, 1–5 December 2002.Google Scholar
  16. Hewson, M. G. (1988). The ecological context of knowledge: implications for learning science in developing countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hicks, D. (1996). Contextual inquiries: A discourse-oriented study of classroom learning. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 104–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodson, D. (1993). In search of a rationale for a multicultural science education. Science & Education, 77(6), 685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jegede, O., & Aikenhead, S. (1999). Transcending cultural borders: implications for science teaching. Journal for Science & Technology Education, 17(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jegede, O., & Aikenhead, G. (2004). Transcending cultural borders: Implications for science teaching. In E. Scanlon, P. Murphy, J. Thomas, & E. Whitelegg (Eds.), Reconsidering science learning (pp. 153–175). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Kamberelis, G. (2001). Producing heteroglossic classroom (micro)cultures through hybrid discourse practice. Linguistics and Education, 12(1), 85–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelly, G. J. (2007). Discourse in science classrooms. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 443–469). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Kelly, G., & Sezen, A. (2010). Activity, discourse & meaning. Some directions for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kittleson, J., & Southerland, S. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: a case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2007). The social construction of participation in an elementary classroom community. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3–4), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumpulainen, K., & Wray, D. (Eds.) (2002). Classroom interaction and social learning: From theory to practice. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  27. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-english- language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 12–21.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2007). Science education and student diversity: Race/ethnicity, langauge, culrure, and socioeconomic status. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 171–197). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  31. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McIntyre, E., Rosebery, A., & González, N. (Eds.). (2001). Classroom diversity: Connecting curriculum to students’ lives. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  33. Moje, E., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. (2001). Maestro, what is ‘quality’? Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mortimer, E., & Scott, Ph. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 224–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pomeroy, D. (1994). Science education and cultural diversity: mapping the field. Studies in Science Education, 24, 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reveles, J., Brown, M., & Bryan, A. (2008). Contextual shifting: teachers emphasizing students’ academic identity to promote scientific literacy. Science & Education, 92(6), 1015–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inqiry laboratories. Dortrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Roth, W.-M. (2010). Language, learning, context: Talking the talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shepardson, D. P., & Britsch, S. J. (2006). Zones of interaction: differential access to elementary science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Snively, G. (1995). Bridging traditional science and Western science in the multicultural classroom. In G. Snively & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Thinking globally about mathematics and science education (pp. 53–75). Vancouver: Centre for the Study of Curriculum and Instruction, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  45. Taylor, C. A. (1994). Science as cultural practice: a rhetorical perspective. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wallace, C., & Narayan, R. (2002). Acquiring the social language of science: Building science language identities through inquiry-based investigations. International Conference: Ontological, Epistemological, Linguistic and Pedagogical Considerations of Language and Science Literacy: Empowering Research and Informing Instruction. University of Victoria, BC, Canada, September 12.Google Scholar
  47. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wells, G. (2007). Semiotic mediation, dialogue and the construction of knowledge. Human Development, 50(5), 244–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wells, G., & Claxton, G. (2002). Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 1–18). London: Blackwells.Google Scholar
  50. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Yerrick, R., & Roth, W.-M. (Eds.) (2005). Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of research on teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Primary Education CouncilPeristeriGreece

Personalised recommendations