Abstract
New Zealand has had a national school science curriculum for more than 80 years. In the past the evolution content of this document has varied, and has at times been strongly influenced by creationist lobby groups. The ‘new’ science curriculum, to be fully implemented in 2010, places much greater emphasis than before on understanding evolution, and also on teaching the nature of science. Interplay between the two can potentially improve student understanding of the culture and processes of science in general and evolutionary theory in particular. While the explicit use of the word ‘evolution’ highlights its significance, it is necessary to provide both resources and pedagogical guidelines to support teachers in dealing with this important topic.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alles, D. L. (2001). Using evolution as the framework for teaching biology. The American Biology Teacher, 63(1), 20–23.
Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 1–25.
Bell, B., & Baker, R. (1997). Developing the science curriculum in Aotearoa New Zealand. Auckland: Addison Wesley Longman.
Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1994). Teacher development as professional, personal, and social development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(5), 483–497.
Bloom, J. W. (1989). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of science: science, theories and evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 401–415.
Chalmers, A. (1999). What is this thing called science? Hackett Publishing Company: Indianapolis, IN.
Dagher, Z. R., & Boujaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: the case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 429–445.
Education Gazette. (22 August 2003). Ministry of Education, Wellington, NZ.
Fensham, P. (2001). Science content as problematic—issues for research. In H. Behrendt et al. (Eds.), Research in science education—past, present, and future (pp. 27–42). New York: Kluwer Academic.
Glynn, T., Cowie, B., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2008). Quality teaching research and development science hub (Waikato): Connecting New Zealand teachers of science with their Maori students. Hamilton: Wilf Malcom Institute for Education Research, The University of Waikato.
Hipkins, R. (2006). Ontological possibilities for rethinking teaching of the ‘nature of science’. PhD thesis, Deakin University, Australia. Retrieved from the Australian Digital Theses Program http://tux.lib.deakin.edu.au/adt-VDU/public/adt-VDU20070801.154606 (access date 22 September 2008).
Hipkins, R., Barker, M., & Bolstad, R. (2005). Teaching the ‘nature of science’: modest adaptations or radical reconceptions? International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 243–254.
Jones, A., McKim, A., Reiss, M., Ryan, B., Buntting, C., De Luca, R., et al. (2007). Research and development of classroom-based resources for bioethics education in New Zealand: Final Report. Commissioned research report.
Keown, P., Parker, L., & Tiakiwai, S. (2005). Values in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Ladd, H. F., & Fiske, E. B. (2003). Does competition improve teaching and learning? Evidence from New Zealand. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(1), 97–112.
Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224.
Loveless, M., & Barker, M. (2000). “Those pages we just turn over ...”: the ‘nature of science’ in science in the New Zealand curriculum. New Zealand Science Teacher, 93, 28–31.
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. Science and Education, 7(6), 511–532.
McGeorge, C. (1992). Evolution in the primary school curriculum. History of Education, 21(2), 205–218.
Ministry of Education. (1993). Science in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media Ltd.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum for English-medium teaching and learning in years 1–13. Wellington: Learning Media Ltd.
Nelson, C. E. (2008). Teaching evolution (and all of biology) more effectively: strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions. Integrated and Comparative Biology, 48(2), 213–225. doi:10.1093/icb/icn027.
Nichols, L. (2008). Christians challenge teaching of evolution. The Dominion Post, Saturday June 28. Available on-line: http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominionpost/4599813a6000.html (access date 2 October 2008).
Numbers, R. L., & Stenhouse, J. (2000). Antievolutionism in the Antipodes: from protesting evolution to promoting creationism in New Zealand. The British Journal for the History of Science, 33, 335–350.
Otrel-Cass, K., Earl, K., Campbell, A., & Cooke, P. (2005). Evolution for teaching: website evaluation report. The New Zealand Science Teacher, 109, 27–29.
Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2000). A course in evolutionary biology: engaging students in the “practice” of evolution. National Centre for Improving Student Learning & Achievement in Mathematics & Science. Research report #00-1, pp. 1–11.
Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modelling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 185–204.
Peddie, W. S. (1995). Alienated by Evolution: the educational implications of creationist and social Darwinist reactions in New Zealand to the Darwinian theory of evolution. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Auckland.
Pigliucci, M. (2002). Denying evolution: Creationism, scientism, and the nature of science. Sunderland: Sinauer.
Reiss, M. J. (2007). Imagining the world: the significance of religious worldviews for science education. Science and Education. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9091-9.
Reiss, M. J. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 157–186.
Scharmann, L. C. (2005). A proactive strategy for teaching evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 67(1), 12–16.
Scott, E. C., & Branch, G. (2003). Evolution: what’s wrong with teaching the controversy? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18(10), 499–502.
Tidon, R., & Lewontin, R. C. (2004). Teaching evolutionary biology. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 27(1), 124–131.
Acknowledgements
Our thanks to the late Peter Spratt for information provided through informal chats and e-mail discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, A., Otrel-Cass, K. Teaching Evolution in New Zealand’s Schools—Reviewing Changes in the New Zealand Science Curriculum. Res Sci Educ 41, 441–451 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9173-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9173-6