Teaching Evolution in New Zealand’s Schools—Reviewing Changes in the New Zealand Science Curriculum
- 347 Downloads
New Zealand has had a national school science curriculum for more than 80 years. In the past the evolution content of this document has varied, and has at times been strongly influenced by creationist lobby groups. The ‘new’ science curriculum, to be fully implemented in 2010, places much greater emphasis than before on understanding evolution, and also on teaching the nature of science. Interplay between the two can potentially improve student understanding of the culture and processes of science in general and evolutionary theory in particular. While the explicit use of the word ‘evolution’ highlights its significance, it is necessary to provide both resources and pedagogical guidelines to support teachers in dealing with this important topic.
KeywordsEvolution New Zealand Curriculum Teaching Nature of science
Our thanks to the late Peter Spratt for information provided through informal chats and e-mail discussions.
- Bell, B., & Baker, R. (1997). Developing the science curriculum in Aotearoa New Zealand. Auckland: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
- Chalmers, A. (1999). What is this thing called science? Hackett Publishing Company: Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
- Education Gazette. (22 August 2003). Ministry of Education, Wellington, NZ.Google Scholar
- Fensham, P. (2001). Science content as problematic—issues for research. In H. Behrendt et al. (Eds.), Research in science education—past, present, and future (pp. 27–42). New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
- Glynn, T., Cowie, B., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2008). Quality teaching research and development science hub (Waikato): Connecting New Zealand teachers of science with their Maori students. Hamilton: Wilf Malcom Institute for Education Research, The University of Waikato.Google Scholar
- Hipkins, R. (2006). Ontological possibilities for rethinking teaching of the ‘nature of science’. PhD thesis, Deakin University, Australia. Retrieved from the Australian Digital Theses Program http://tux.lib.deakin.edu.au/adt-VDU/public/adt-VDU20070801.154606 (access date 22 September 2008).
- Jones, A., McKim, A., Reiss, M., Ryan, B., Buntting, C., De Luca, R., et al. (2007). Research and development of classroom-based resources for bioethics education in New Zealand: Final Report. Commissioned research report.Google Scholar
- Keown, P., Parker, L., & Tiakiwai, S. (2005). Values in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
- Loveless, M., & Barker, M. (2000). “Those pages we just turn over ...”: the ‘nature of science’ in science in the New Zealand curriculum. New Zealand Science Teacher, 93, 28–31.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education. (1993). Science in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media Ltd.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum for English-medium teaching and learning in years 1–13. Wellington: Learning Media Ltd.Google Scholar
- Nichols, L. (2008). Christians challenge teaching of evolution. The Dominion Post, Saturday June 28. Available on-line: http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominionpost/4599813a6000.html (access date 2 October 2008).
- Otrel-Cass, K., Earl, K., Campbell, A., & Cooke, P. (2005). Evolution for teaching: website evaluation report. The New Zealand Science Teacher, 109, 27–29.Google Scholar
- Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2000). A course in evolutionary biology: engaging students in the “practice” of evolution. National Centre for Improving Student Learning & Achievement in Mathematics & Science. Research report #00-1, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
- Peddie, W. S. (1995). Alienated by Evolution: the educational implications of creationist and social Darwinist reactions in New Zealand to the Darwinian theory of evolution. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
- Pigliucci, M. (2002). Denying evolution: Creationism, scientism, and the nature of science. Sunderland: Sinauer.Google Scholar