Research in Science Education

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 319–340 | Cite as

Exploring the Development of Fifth Graders’ Practical Epistemologies and Explanation Skills in Inquiry-Based Learning Classrooms



The purposes of this study are to explore fifth graders’ epistemological views regarding their own experiences of constructing scientific knowledge through inquiry activities (i.e., practical epistemologies) and to investigate possible interactions between students’ practical epistemologies and their inquiry skills to construct scientific explanations (i.e., explanation skills). Quantitative and qualitative data including interview transcripts, classroom video recordings, and pre- and post-tests of explanation skills were collected from 68 fifth graders in two science classes. Analyses of data show that after engaging in 5-week inquiry activities, students developed better inquiry skills to construct scientific explanations. More students realized the existence of experimental errors, viewed experimental data as evidence to support their claims, and had richer understanding about the nature of scientific questions. However, most students’ epistemological beliefs were still naïve (the beginning level); they could not differentiate between experimental results and scientific knowledge and believed that the purpose of science is doing experiments or research. The results also show that students who held a more sophisticated epistemology (the intermediate level) tended to develop better inquiry skills than those with naïve beliefs. Analyses of classroom observations suggest possible explanations for how students reflected their epistemological views in their inquiry practices.


Epistemology Explanation skill Inquiry 


  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., et al. (2004). Inquiry in science education: international perspectives. Science Education, 88, 394–419.Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1155–1173). Great Britain: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students’ knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84(1), 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2003). TIMSS special initiative in problem solving and inquiry. Retrieved August 14, 2007, from
  8. Khishfe, R. (2008). The development of seventh graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 470–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuhn, D. (2007). Reasoning about multiple variables: control of variables is not the only challenge. Science Education, 91, 710–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 495–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin, H. S., Chiu, H. L., & Chou, C. Y. (2004). Student understanding of the nature of science and their problem-solving strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J. S., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meichtry, Y. J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: data from a case of curriculum development. Journal Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ministry of Education. (1999). Curriculum outlines for nature science and living technology. Taipei: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  18. Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  20. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  21. Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Explanation-driven inquiry: integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 345–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sandoval, W. A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students’ ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: an explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shimoda, T., White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (2002). Student goal orientation in learning inquiry skills with modifiable software advisors. Science Education, 86, 244–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, C. L., & Wenk, L. (2006). Relations among three aspects of first-year college students’ epistemologies of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), 747–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, C. L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2000). Sixth-grade students’ epistemologies of science: the impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 3349–3422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Songer, N. B., & Gotwals, A. (2004). What constitutes evidence of complex reasoning in science? Paper presented at the The Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsai, C. C. (1999). “Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths”: a study of eighth graders’ scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science Education, 83, 654–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu, H.-K., & Hsieh, C.-E. (2006). Developing sixth graders’ inquiry skills to construct scientific explanations in inquiry-based learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1289–1313.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Science EducationNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Daguang Elementary SchoolPingtung CountyTaiwan

Personalised recommendations