Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 223–238 | Cite as

Questions About Physics: The Case of a Turkish ‘Ask a Scientist’ Website

  • Sevda Yerdelen-Damar
  • Ali Eryılmaz
Article

Abstract

The physics questions submitted to an ‘ask a scientist’ website were classified with respect to field of interest in physics, type of requested information in the question (factual, explanatory, etc.), and motivation for asking the question (applicative or non--applicative). In addition, differences in the number of females’ and males’ questions in these classifications were determined. Analysis of 995 physics questions submitted to the website indicated that modern physics questions (30.7%) were the most frequent while vibrations and wave motion questions (3.3%) were the least frequent. More than half of the questions (57.8%) were submitted to request factual information. Motivation to ask a question was inferred from the question, and was generally not related to direct and/or personal application. There were obvious differences in the number of questions asked by females and males: 84.7% of questions were asked by males while 15.3% were asked by females. However, significant gender differences were not observed in field of interest in physics, type of information requested in the question, and motivation for asking the question.

Keywords

Physics education Physics questions Interest Gender 

References

  1. Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Characterizing children’s spontaneous interests in science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 803–826. doi: 10.1080/09500690500038389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2002). Posing problems for open investigations: what questions do pupils ask? Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 269–287. doi: 10.1080/0263514022000030499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chin, C., Brown, D. E., & Bruce, B. C. (2002). Student-generated questions: a meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521–549. doi: 10.1080/09500690110095249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiristidou, V. (2006). Greek students’ science-related interest and experiences: gender differences and correlations. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1181–1199. doi: 10.1080/09500690500439389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colbert, J. T., Olson, J. K., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Using the web to encourage student-generated questions in large-format introductory biology classes. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6, 42–48. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-07-0171.Google Scholar
  6. Commeyras, M. (1995). What can we learn from students' questions? Theory into Practice, 34(2), 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa, J., Caldeira, H., Gallástegui, J. R., & Otero, J. (2000). An analysis of question asking on scientific texts explaining natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 602–614. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<602::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-N.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahlgren, M. A., & Öberg, G. (2001). Questioning to learn and learning to question: structure and function of problem-based learning scenarios in environmental science education. Higher Education, 41, 263–282. doi: 10.1023/A:1004138810465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawson, C. (2000). Upper primary boys’ and girls’ interests in science: have they changed since 1980? International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 557–570. doi: 10.1080/095006900289660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Jesus, H. P., Teixeira-Dias, J. J. C., & Watts, M. (2003). Questions of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 1015–1034. doi: 10.1080/09500690305022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 411–430. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199904)36:4<411::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gungor, A., Eryılmaz, A., & Fakıoğlu, T. (2007). The relationship of freshmen’s physics achievement and their related affective characteristics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1036–1056. doi: 10.1002/tea.20200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harper, K. A., Etkina, E., & Lin, Y. (2003). Encouraging and analyzing student questions in a large physics course: meaningful patterns for instructors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 776–791. doi: 10.1002/tea.10111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Häussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2000). A curricular frame for physics education: development, comparison with students’ interests, and impact on students’ achievement and self-concept. Science Education, 84, 689–705. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<689::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-L.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–571.Google Scholar
  16. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoffman, L. (2002). Promoting girls’ interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 447–465. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791–806. doi: 10.1002/tea.20072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jenkins, E. W., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: students’ attitudes towards secondary science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1080/02635140500068435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, A. T., & Kirk, C. M. (1990). Gender differences in students’ interests in applications of school physics. Physics Education, 25, 308–313. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/25/6/304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, G. M., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180–192. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<180::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 664–687.Google Scholar
  23. King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303–323.Google Scholar
  24. Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15, 381–395. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laukenmann, M., Bleicher, M., Fuß, S., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Mayring, P., & von Rhöneck, C. (2003). An investigation of the influence of emotional factors on learning in physics instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 489–507. doi: 10.1080/09500690210163233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 854–870. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<854::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high school students' views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363–381. doi: 10.1080/09500690500277664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: a focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467. doi: 10.1080/09500690010006518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ram, A. (1991). A theory of questions and question asking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(3&4), 273–318. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0103&4_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 177–199. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0903_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 299–323. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Serway, R. A. (1992). Physics for scientists and engineering with modern physics (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Spall, K., Stanisstreet, M., Dickson, D., & Boyes, E. (2004). Development of school students’ constructions of biology and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 787–803. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000097442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stark, R., & Gray, D. (1999). Gender preferences in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 633–643. doi: 10.1080/095006999290480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stewart, M. (1998). Gender issues in physics education. Educational Research, 40(3), 283–293.Google Scholar
  38. The Higher Education Council, Student Selection and Placement Center. The statistic book of 2006–2007 academic year. (n.d). Retrieved 13 August, 2007, from http://www.osym.gov.tr/BelgeGoster.aspx?F6E10F8892433CFF1A9547B61DAFFE2A4334B67836F053C0.
  39. The publications of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey. (2007). Retrieved 3 September, 2007, from http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/home.do;jsessionid=4A7969263A447672A127E9A61C058214?ot=1&sid=531.
  40. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey.(2007). Retrieved 3 September, 2007, from http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/home.do?ot=1&sid=554&pid=547.
  41. The title of subjects. (2007). Retrieved 3 September, 2007, from http://www.biltek.tubitak.gov.tr/merak_ettikleriniz/.
  42. Thompson, L. H. (1924). Children's questions. Educational Research Bulletin, 3(16), 347 + 350–352.Google Scholar
  43. Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting students' junior high school students' interest in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 47–58. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-0355-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woodward, C., & Woodward, N. (1998). Girls and science: does a core curriculum in primary school give cause for optimism. Gender and Education, 10(4), 387–400. doi: 10.1080/09540259820826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. You’re curious about. (2007). Retrieved 25 July, 2007, from http://www.biltek.tubitak.gov.tr/merak_ettikleriniz/soru_sor.php.
  46. Zohar, A., & Sela, D. (2003). Her physics, his physics: gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 245–268. doi: 10.1080/09500690210126766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yüzüncü Yıl UniversityVanTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Education, Department of Secondary Science and Mathematics EducationMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations