Abstract
This paper distils 24 years of classroom research into promoting quality learning in science classrooms to develop an overall framework for better understanding and describing both the learning and the teaching approaches that stimulate and support it. For me, quality learning is characterised by adjectives such as informed, purposeful, reflective, intellectually active, metacognitive and independent. Central to quality learning is the role of talk, and central to promoting talk which promotes quality learning are certain teacher behaviours. I first focus on the ways that teachers behave in the classroom in order to promote, react to and use student talk. These behaviours are summed up in a list of twelve principles for quality teaching. Each of these principles requires, as well as appropriate teacher behaviours, the use of effective teaching procedures. I then focus on four kinds of student talk that exemplify informed, purposeful, reflective and intellectually active thinking. These variously involve students’ existing ideas and explanations; increasing student ownership of practical activities; constructive challenges to the teacher (or text’s) idea, and lateral, reflective ‘thinking’ questions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird, J. R. (1984). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Monash University, Melbourne.
Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. R. (Eds.). (1995). Learning from the PEEL experience (2nd. Ed.). Melbourne: PEEL.
Barnes D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. Hammondsworth: Penguin.
Dawes L. (2004). Talk and learning in classroom science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 677–695. doi:10.1080/0950069032000097424.
Fenstermacher G. D., & Richardson V. (2005). On Making Determinations of Quality Teaching. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186–213. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00462.x.
Gilbert J. K., Osborne R. J., & Fensham P. J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66, 623–633. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660412.
Gunstone R. F., & White R. (1981). A matter of gravity. Science Education, 65, 291–299. doi:10.1002/sce.3730650308.
Loughran J. J., Mitchell I. J., & Mitchell J. A. (2004). Attempting to document teachers professional knowledge. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(9), 1–21.
Mercer N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359–377. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7.
Mitchell I. J. (1993). Teaching for quality learning. Unpublished Ph.D., Monash University, Melbourne.
Mitchell I. J. (2000). Returning to the discussion PEEL SEEDS, 49, 10–11.
Mitchell, I. J. (Ed.). (2007). Teaching for Effective Learning. The complete book of PEEL teaching procedures. (2nd ed.). Melbourne: PEEL.
Mitchell I. J., & Baird J. R. (1986). Teaching, learning and the curriculum 1: The influence of content in science. Research in Science Education, 16, 141–149. doi:10.1007/BF02356828.
Mitchell, I., Mitchell, J., McKinnon, R., Scheele, S., & Lumb, D. (2007). PEEL in practice: 1400 ideas for quality teaching (8th Ed.). Melbourne: PEEL.
Munby H., & Russell T. (1994). The authority of experience in learning to teach: Messages from a physics method class. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 86–95. doi:10.1177/0022487194045002002.
O’Connor M. C., Michaels S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse learning and schooling, (pp. 63–103) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Renshaw, P., & Brown, R. (1998). Voices in classroom talk: Author(ity) and identity. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, 29 November - 3 December 1998 Adelaide. Retrieved February 2nd, 2007 from http://www.aare.edu.au/98pap/ren98315.htm.
Rowe M. B. (1974). Wait-time and rewards as institutional variables: Their influence on language, logic and fate control. Part 1- Wait- time. Journal of Research in Science Education, 11, 81–89.
Sanderson C. (1993). The science in spoons. PEEL SEEDS, 19, 10.
Sarason S. B. (1996). Revisiting The culture of schools and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Schön D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Suan, M. Z. (1976). Evaluation of ASEP: A case study approach. Unpublished M. Ed Thesis, Monash University.
Sullivan R. (1995). Deduce the practical design from limited information. In I. Mitchell, J. Mitchell, & L. Rijneveld (Eds.), About PEEL, (pp. 7–8) Melbourne: PEEL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitchell, I. The Relationship Between Teacher Behaviours and Student Talk in Promoting Quality Learning in Science Classrooms. Res Sci Educ 40, 171–186 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9106-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9106-9