Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Practices and Innovations in Australian Science Teacher Education Programs

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports part of a larger study which was designed to investigate current practices in initial teacher education programs in Australia. The main data collection was by telephone interviews, which were carried out with science education specialists and program coordinators at all institutions which offer primary teacher education or secondary science teacher education. The interviews focused on practices in relation to program structures, science content studies, science methods studies and links to science-related school projects or to science business/industry. A large number of innovative practices were described. In addition, several case studies were carried out, which focused on particular innovations. The study identified several aspects of science teacher education which were of concern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adey, P. (1998). Preparing a profession. In Australian Council of Deans of Education (1998), Report of the National Standards and Guidelines for Initial Teacher Education Project. Canberra, ACT. Retrieved March 3, 2007, from http://www.acde.edu.au/assets/pdf/PreparingaProfession.pdf.

  • Akerson, V., & Flanigan, J. (2000). Preparing preservice teachers to use an interdisciplinary approach to science and language arts instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Lucas, K., Ginns, I., & Dierking, L. (2000). Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post-visit activities. Science Education, 84, 658–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R., & Mitchener, C. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3--44). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff, P. J., Hatch, D. D., & Watford, L. J. (1999). The state of readiness of initial level preservice middle grades science and mathematics teachers and its implications on teacher education programs. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 394–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlbaw, L., Boroweic, J., & James, R. (2001). Team experiences for science and social studies preservice teachers. The Clearinghouse, 74, 116–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for the Review of Teaching and Teacher Education. (2003). Interim report: Attracting and retaining teachers of science, technology and mathematics. Department of Education, Science and Training. Retrieved March 6, 2007, from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/profiles/retaining_teachers_interim_report.htm.

  • Corrigan, D., & Loughran, J. (1994). Teaching portfolios: Developing quality learning in preservice science teachers. Research in Science Education, 24, 60–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, J., & De Laeter, J. R. (1997). The changing nature of upper secondary school science subject enrolments. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 43, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, I. R., & Calderon, A. J. (1999). Trends in science education: Learning, teaching and outcomes 1989–1997. Melbourne, VIC: Monash University.

  • Dori, Y., & Tal, R. (2000). Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environmental awareness. Science Education, 84, 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, R. (2006). A cross-domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes towards science and attitudes about the utility of science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 571–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, I., & Watters, J. (1999). Beginning elementary school teachers and the effective teaching of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 287–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Thornley, C. (2000). Connecting classrooms in preservice education: Conversations for learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 28, 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, A., English, S., & Silver, H. (1999). Why innovate? Some preliminary findings from a research project on innovations in teaching and learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkey, R., & Clay, J. (1998). Expectations of secondary science: Realisation and retrospect. School Science Review, 79, 81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Sparrow, L., & Oliver, R. (1998). Learning to teach and assess mathematics using multimedia: A teacher development project. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., & Wicklein, R. (2000). Great expectations: Preparing technology education teachers for new roles and responsibilities. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 37, 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howey, K. (1996). Designing coherent and effective teacher education programs. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 143--170). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiggins, J. (2001, November). From project to program: The evolution of an alternative teacher education model. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE), Freemantle, WA.

  • Laugksh, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrance, G. A., & Palmer, D. H. (2003). Clever teachers, clever sciences: Preparing teachers for the challenge of teaching science, mathematics and technology in 21st Century Australia. Australian Government, Department of Education, Science and Training. Retrieved March 3, 2007, from http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/C571311D-04D5-4DB3-BA26-65051BD21FBE/812/03_06.pdf.

  • Logan, M., & Skamp, K. (2004, July). Looking at students’ attitudes to science in late primary and junior secondary school. Paper presented at the Australasian Science Education Research Association conference, Armidale, N.S.W.

  • Lovat, T. (1999). Searching for best practice in initial teacher education: Responding to the challenges. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T. (2006). The puzzle of falling enrolments in physics and chemistry courses: Putting some pieces together. Research in Science Education, 36, 285–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, A., & Dana, T. (1999). Making science relevant: The experiences of prospective elementary school teachers in an innovative science content course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mewborn, D. (2000). Meaningful integration of mathematics methods instruction and field experience. Action in Teacher Education, 21, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high school students’ views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. J., & Watson, S. B. (1999). Contributors to the decision of elementary education majors to choose science as an academic concentration. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister’s Science, Engineering and Innovation Councilo. (1999). Occasional Paper. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M. (2001). Science teaching and learning in Australian schools: Results of a national study. Research in Science Education, 31, 455–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82, 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, H. (1998). Innovations in teaching and learning in higher education: An annotated bibliography. University Of Plymouth, Exmouth. Retrieved July 1, 2002, from http://www.fae.plym.ac.uk/itlhe.html.

  • Skamp, K. (1992). Science discipline knowledge for primary teachers. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 20, 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2000). Content and pedagogical content knowledge for elementary science teacher educators: Knowing our students. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spall, K., Stanisstreet, M., Dickson, D., & Boyes, E. (2004). Development of school students’ constructions of biology and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 787–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speedy, G. W., Annice, C., & Fensham P. J. (1989). Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science. Department of Employment, Education and Training, Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Services.

  • Tosun, T. (2000). The beliefs of preservice elementary teachers towards science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 100, 374–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumper, R. (1998). The need for change in elementary-school teacher training: The force concept as an example. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watters, J. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2000). Developing motivation to teach elementary science: Effect of collaborative and authentic learning practices in pre-service education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. (1998). Senate inquiry into the status of teachers. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 44, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, S., & Goodrum, D. (1990). How confident are primary school teachers in teaching science? Research in Science Education, 20, 300–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia

    David Palmer

Authors
  1. David Palmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Palmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palmer, D. Practices and Innovations in Australian Science Teacher Education Programs. Res Sci Educ 38, 167–188 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9043-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9043-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation