An Exploration of High School (12–17 Year Old) Students' Understandings of, and Attitudes Towards Biotechnology Processes
- 517 Downloads
The products of modern biotechnology processes such as genetic engineering, DNA testing and cloning will increasingly impact on society. It is essential that young people have a well-developed scientific understanding of biotechnology and associated processes so that they are able to contribute to public debate and make informed personal decisions. The aim of this study was to examine the development of understandings and attitudes about biotechnology processes as students progress through high school. In a cross-sectional case study, data was obtained from student interviews and written surveys of students aged 12 to 17 years. The results indicate that students' ability to provide a generally accepted definition and examples of biotechnology, cloning and genetically modified foods was relatively poor amongst 12–13 year old students but improved in older students. Most students approved of the use of biotechnology processes involving micro-organisms, plants and humans and disapproved of the use of animals. Overall, 12–13 year old students' attitudes were less favourable than older students regardless of the context. An awareness of the development and range of students' understandings and attitudes may lead to a more appropriate use of biotechnology curriculum materials and thus improved biotechnology education in schools.
Key wordsbiotechnology education gene technology public understanding of science scientific literacy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The author would like to thank Ms Barbara Bowra for her expert assistance in analysing the data using SPSS.
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Mahwah, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Chen, S. Y., & Raffan, J. (1999). Biotechnology: Student's knowledge and attitudes in the UK and Taiwan. Journal of Biological Education, 34(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
- Dawson, V. M. (2003). Effect of a forensic DNA testing module on adolescents' ethical decision-making abilities. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 49(4), 12–17.Google Scholar
- Dawson, V. M., & Schibeci, R. A. (2003b). West Australian high school students' attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 7–12.Google Scholar
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998) Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 1–34). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2001). Europeans, science and technology. Eurobarometer 55.2. Retrieved 14 June, 2005 from http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb_special_en.htm.
- Gamble, J. (2002). An exploration of the New Zealand public's perceptions of genetic modification. New Zealand Biotechnology Association Journal, 53(7–13).Google Scholar
- Gaskell, G., Allum, N., & Stares, S. (2003). Europeans and biotechnology in 2002. Eurobarometer 58.0. Retrieved 14 June, 2005 from http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb_special_en.htm.
- Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. A Research Report prepared for the Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Retrieved 14 June, 2005 from http://www.detya.gov.au/schools/publications/2001/science.
- Gunter, B., Kinderlerer, J., & Beyleveld, D. (1998). Teenagers and biotechnology: A survey of understanding and opinion in Britain. Studies in Science Education, 32, 81–112.Google Scholar
- Hill, R., Stanistreet, M., O'Sullivan, H., & Boyes, E. (1999). Genetic engineering of animals for medical research: Students' views. School Science Review, 80(293), 23–30.Google Scholar
- Lock, R., Miles, C., & Hughes, S. (1995). The influence of teaching on knowledge and attitudes in biotechnology and genetic engineering contexts: Implications for teaching controversial issues and the public understanding of science. School Science Review, 76(276), 47–59.Google Scholar
- Macer, D., Asada, Y., Tsuzuki, M., Akiyama, S., & Macer, N. (1996). Bioethics in high schools in Australia, Japan & New Zealand. Christchurch, NZ: Eubios Ethics Institute.Google Scholar
- Olsher, G., & Dreyful, A. (1999). The ‘ostension-teaching approach’ as a means to develop junior-high student attitudes towards biotechnologies. Journal of Biological Education, 34(1), 24–30.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.Google Scholar
- Tytler, R. (2005). Constructivist views of teaching and learning. In G. Venville & V. Dawson (Eds.), The art of teaching science (pp. 18–33). Sydney, NSW: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar