Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Year 12 Students' Mental Models of the Nature of Light

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports on the third year of a three-year longitudinal investigation into six secondary students' understanding of optics at a secondary school level. In the third year of this investigation the students, who by now were in Year 12, underwent a teaching sequence that centred on the teaching and learning of physical optics and quantum ideas. The students' mental models of the nature of light were explored prior to, and following this teaching sequence. The researcher took on the dual roles of teacher and researcher. This paper will outline the findings of the third year of this study and the implications they have for the teaching and learning of optics at secondary school level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose, B. S., Shaffer, P. S., Steinberg, R. N., & McDermott, L. C. (1999). An investigation of students' understanding of single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference. American Journal of Physics, 67(2), 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Board of Studies (1994). Physics VCE study design. Carlton, Victoria: Board of Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 129–186). MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, E., Armitage, F., Brown, M., Butler, P., & Hayes, J. (1991). Physics two. Port Melbourne, Victoria: Rigby Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1995). Constructivist approaches to science teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 385–400). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P. (1985). QED: The strange theory of light and matter. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, O. R. (1972). The nature of matter. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galili, I., Bendall, S., & Goldberg, F. (1993). The effects of prior knowledge and instruction on understanding image formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 271–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galili, I., & Lavrik, V. (1998). Flux concept in learning about light: a critique of the present situation. Science Education, 82, 591–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (Ed.) (1994). Models and modelling in science education. Hatfield: The Association for Science Education.

  • Gilbert, J. K. (1995). Studies and fields: directions of research in science education. Studies in Science Education, 25(2), 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. (1995, April). The role of models and modelling in some narratives of science learning. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Goldin, G. A. (1990). Epistemology, constructivism, and discovery learning mathematics. In R. B. Davies, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (Monograph 4, pp. 31–50). Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1991). What is the constructivist paradigm? In D. S. Anderson & B. J. Biddle (Eds.), Knowledge for policy improving education through research (pp.158–170). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloum, I. (1996). Schematic modelling for meaningful learning of physics. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1019–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, I. D., Crawford, K., & Fletcher, P. R. (1988). Student difficulties in learning quantum mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 427–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2000). History and philosophy of science through models: Some challenges in the case of ‘the atom.’ International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 993–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marburger, J. H. (1996). What is a photon? The Physics Teacher, 34, 482–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munn, A. M. (1973). From nought to relativity – Creating the physical world model. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, R., & Desautels, J. (1984). Epistemology and the teaching of science. Ottawa: Science Council of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 7–14). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohanian, H. C. (1985). Physics. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. L., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronchi, V. (1970). The nature of light. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing students' misclassifications of physics concepts: an ontological basis for conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 373–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, F. F. A., & Finegold, M. (1995). Models in physics: perceptions held by final-year prospective physical science teachers studying at South African universities. International Journal of Science Education, 17(5), 621–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. N., Oberem, G. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1996). Development of a computer-based tutorial on the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 64(11), 1370–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R., Wittman, L. B., Bao, L., & Redish, E. F. (1999, March). The influence of student understanding of classical physics when learning quantum mechanics. Paper presented at the annual meeting National Association for Research in Science Teaching.

  • Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, Victoria, 3125, Australia

    Peter Hubber

Authors
  1. Peter Hubber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Hubber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hubber, P. Year 12 Students' Mental Models of the Nature of Light. Res Sci Educ 36, 419–439 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9013-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9013-x

Key words

Search

Navigation