Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 35, Issue 2–3, pp 299–321 | Cite as

Student Perceptions of Chemistry Laboratory Learning Environments, Student–Teacher Interactions and Attitudes in Secondary School Gifted Education Classes in Singapore

  • Quek Choon Lang
  • Angela F. L. Wong
  • Barry J. Fraser
Article

Abstract

This study investigated the chemistry laboratory classroom environment, teacher–student interactions and student attitudes towards chemistry among 497 gifted and non-gifted secondary-school students in Singapore. The data were collected using the 35-item Chemistry Laboratory Environment Inventory (CLEI), the 48-item Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) and the 30-item Questionnaire on Chemistry-Related Attitudes (QOCRA). Results supported the validity and reliability of the CLEI and QTI for this sample. Stream (gifted versus non-gifted) and gender differences were found in actual and preferred chemistry laboratory classroom environments and teacher–student interactions. Some statistically significant associations of modest magnitude were found between students' attitudes towards chemistry and both the laboratory classroom environment and the interpersonal behaviour of chemistry teachers. Suggestions for improving chemistry laboratory classroom environments and the teacher–student interactions for gifted students are provided.

Keywords

attitudes chemistry laboratory classroom learning environment gender gifted education interactions secondary school stream 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fisher, D. L., Fraser, B. J., & Rickards, T. (1997, April). Gender and cultural differences in teacher–student interpersonal behaviour. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar
  2. Fisher, D. L., Goh, S. C., Wong, A. F. L., & Rickards, T. W. (1997). Perceptions of interpersonal teacher behaviour in secondary science classrooms in Singapore and Australia. Journal of Applied Research in Education, 1(2), 2–13. Google Scholar
  3. Fisher, D. L., Henderson, D., & Fraser, B. J. (1995). Interpersonal behaviour in senior high school biology classes. Research in Science Education, 25, 125–133. Google Scholar
  4. Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA). Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research. Google Scholar
  5. Fraser, B. J. (1986). Classroom environment. London: Croom Helm. Google Scholar
  6. Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493–541). New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
  7. Fraser, B. J. (1998a). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33. Google Scholar
  8. Fraser, B. J. (1998b). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects and determinants. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Google Scholar
  9. Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 1–25). Singapore: World Scientific. Google Scholar
  10. Fraser, B. J., Giddings, G. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (1992). Assessment of the psychosocial environment of university science laboratory classrooms: A cross-national study. Higher Education, 24, 431–451. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fraser, B. J., Giddings, G. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (1995). Evolution and validation of a personal form of an instrument for assessing science laboratory classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 399–422. Google Scholar
  12. Fraser, B. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (1995). Science laboratory classroom environments at schools and universities: A cross-national study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1, 289–317. Google Scholar
  13. Fraser, B. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Giddings, G. J. (1993). Development and cross-national validation of a laboratory classroom environment instrument for senior high school science. Science Education, 77, 1–24. Google Scholar
  14. Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (1991). Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar
  15. Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Validation of an elementary school version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Psychological Reports, 79, 512–522. Google Scholar
  16. Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Teacher interpersonal behaviour, classroom environment and student outcomes in primary mathematics in Singapore. Learning Environment Research, 1, 199–229. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Teacher interpersonal behaviour and elementary students' outcomes. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14, 216–231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goh, S. C., & Khine, M. S. (Eds.). (2002). Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective. Singapore: World Scientific. Google Scholar
  19. Goh, S. C., Young, D. J., & Fraser, B. J. (1995). Psychosocial climate and student outcomes in elementary mathematics classrooms: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 29–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim, H. B., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Classroom environment and teacher interpersonal behaviour in secondary school classes in Korea. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14, 3–22. Google Scholar
  21. Kim, H. B., & Kim, D. Y. (1995). Survey on the perceptions towards science laboratory classroom environment of university students majoring in education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 14, 163–171. Google Scholar
  22. Kim, H. B., & Kim, D. Y. (1996). Middle and high school students' perceptions of science laboratory and their attitudes in science and science subjects. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 14, 210–216. Google Scholar
  23. Kim, H. B., & Lee, S. K. (1997). Science teachers' beliefs about science and school science and their perceptions of science laboratory learning environment. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 17, 210–216. Google Scholar
  24. Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings, & G. F. Madaus (Eds.), Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning (pp. 559–642). New York: McGraw Hill. Google Scholar
  25. Kremer-Hayon, L., & Wubbels, T. (1992). Interpersonal relationships of cooperation teachers and student teachers' satisfaction with supervision. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27, 31–38. Google Scholar
  26. Leary, T. (1957). An interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press. Google Scholar
  27. Lee, S. S. U., & Fraser, B. J. (2001a, March). High school science classroom learning environments in Korea. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO. Google Scholar
  28. Lee, S. S. U., & Fraser, B. (2001b, December). Science laboratory classroom environments in Korea. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Australia. Google Scholar
  29. Lee, S. S. U., & Fraser, B. J. (2002, April). High school science classroom learning environments in Korea. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Google Scholar
  30. Lee, S. S. U., & Fraser, B. J. (2003). Teacher–student interactions in Korean high school science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 67–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McRobbie, C. J., & Fraser, B. J. (1993). Associations between student outcomes and psychosocial science environment. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 78–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moos, R. H. (1974a). Evaluating treatment environments: A social ecological approach. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  33. Moos, R. H. (1974b). The social climate scales: An overview. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Google Scholar
  34. Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures, findings and policy implications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
  35. Phua, S. L. (1983). The gifted project. Singapore: Ministry of Education. Google Scholar
  36. Quah, M. L., & Teo, C. T. (1994). Personality characteristics and creative thinking ability of graduate teachers who are interested to teach gifted and talented pupils. Paper presented at the eight annual conference of the Educational Research Association, Singapore. Google Scholar
  37. Quek, C. L., Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2001, December). Determinants and effects of perceptions of chemistry classroom learning environments in secondary school gifted education classes in Singapore. Paper presented at annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Perth. Google Scholar
  38. Riah, H., & Fraser, B. (1998, April). Chemistry learning environment and its association with students' achievement in chemistry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Google Scholar
  39. Riah, H., Fraser, B. J., & Rickards, T. (1997, May). Interpersonal teacher behaviour in chemistry classes in Brunei Darussalam's secondary schools. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Innovations in Science and Mathematics Curricula, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei, Darussalam. Google Scholar
  40. Scott, R. H., & Fisher, D. L. (2004). Development, validation and application of a Malay translation of an elementary version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Research in Science Education, 34, 173–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soerjaningsih, W., Fraser, B. J., & Aldridge, J. (2001, December). Learning environment, teacher–student interpersonal behaviour and achievement among university students in Indonesia. Paper presented at annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Perth. Google Scholar
  42. Thompson, B. (1998). Review of “what if there were no significance tests?” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 334–346. Google Scholar
  43. Tobin, K. G., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Qualitative and quantitative landscapes of classroom learning environments. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 623–640). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Google Scholar
  44. Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968a). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419. Google Scholar
  45. Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968b). The achievement-creativity dimension of classroom climate. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 2, 281–291. Google Scholar
  46. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. (1967). The pragmatics of human communication. New York: Norton. Google Scholar
  47. Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1995). Cross-validation in Singapore of the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory. Psychological Reports, 76, 907–911. Google Scholar
  48. Wong, A. L. F., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 64, 29–40. Google Scholar
  49. Wong, A. L. F., Young, D. J., & Fraser, B. J. (1997). A multilevel analysis of learning environments and student attitudes. Educational Psychology, 17, 449–468. Google Scholar
  50. Wubbels, T. (1993). Teacher–student relationships in science and mathematics classes (What research says to the science and mathematics teacher). Perth, Australia: National Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology. Google Scholar
  51. Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (1998). The teacher factor in the social climate of the classroom. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 565–580). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Google Scholar
  52. Wubbels, T., Creton, H. A., & Holvast, A. (1988). Undesirable classroom situations: A system communication perspective. Interchange, 19, 25–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (1991). A comparison of interpersonal behaviour of Dutch and American teachers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, 1–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (Eds.). (1993). Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education. London: Falmer Press. Google Scholar
  55. Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1991). Interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 141–160). London: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quek Choon Lang
    • 1
  • Angela F. L. Wong
    • 1
  • Barry J. Fraser
    • 2
  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingapore
  2. 2.Curtin University of TechnologyAustralia

Personalised recommendations