Abstract
This paper is about a study into the nature of analogies recorded from three Form 2 (Grade 10) classes in Kenya, instructed by three physics teachers. Through a case study method involving classroom observation, several analogies were recorded and analysed. These analogies were predominantly environmental (drawn from students’ socio-cultural environment) and anthropomorphic (life and human characteristics ascribed to analogues involving familiar concepts). A small number were scientific (those in which analogues are drawn from the science knowledge domain) – ones the author, for pedagogical reasons, wishes to see exploited. In addition, targets (concepts to be explained) were not freed from analogues (concepts used to explain), which is problematic. Also recorded were instances of students making statements that contained counter-physics messages. These included statements conveying literal understanding of technical terminology, sense experience understanding, which proved very robust, and obvious transfer of error from a particular knowledge domain to another. Caution is therefore advised to ensure that before developing and deploying analogies, students’ understanding of the analogues must be sought. This most likely will reveal problems in their understanding and should be rectified before applying its meaning to the target.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 269–289.
Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. L.(1998). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 283–312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Anderson, G. (1990). Fundamentals of educational research. Basingstoke, UK: Palmer Press.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.
Bloom, J. W. (1995). Assessing and extending the scope of children’s contexts of meaning: Context maps as methodological perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 17(2), 167–187.
Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873–878.
Brown, D. E. (1993). Refocusing core intuitions: A concretising role for analogy in conceptual change. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1273–1290.
Brown, D. E., & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction. Instructional Science, 18, 237–261.
Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions. International Journal of Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241–1257.
Clement, J. J. (1998). Expert novice similarities and instruction using analogies. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1271–1280.
Cobern, W. W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change. Science Education, 80(5), 574–610.
Coetzee, P. H., & Roux, A. P. J. (Eds.). (1998). The African philosophy reader. New York: Routledge.
Dagher, Z. R. (1995). Analysis of analogies used by science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 259–270.
Dale, L. G. (1975). Some implications from the work of Jean Piaget. In P. L. Gardner (Ed.), The structure of science education (pp. 115–139). Hawthorn, Victoria: Longman.
Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories in action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students’ conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37–60.
Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649–672.
Duit, R., Roth, W. M., Komorek, M., & Wilbers, J. (1998). Conceptual change cum discourse analysis to understand cognition in a unit on chaotic systems: Towards an integrative perspective on learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1059–1073.
Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative research methods on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361–376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1998). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 47–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gallagher, J. J., & Tobin, K. G. (1991). Reporting interpretive research. In J. J. Gallagher (Ed.), Interpretive research in science education (pp. 85–95), NARST Monograph, Number 4. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University.
Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R. W., Markman, A. B., Levidow, B. B., Wolf, P., & Forbus, K. D. (1997). Analogical reasoning and conceptual change: A case study of Johannes Kepler. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(1), 3–40.
Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models (pp. 99–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Giancoli, D. C. (2000). Physics for scientists and engineers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Glynn, M. S. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching with analogy model. In M. S. Glynn, H. R. Yeany, & K. B. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 219–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
Gunstone, R. F. (1994). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In P. J. Fensham, R. F. Gunstones, & R. T. White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to teaching and learning (pp. 131–146). Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
Harrison, A. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1993). Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade 10 optics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1291–1301.
Harrison, A. B., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011–1026.
Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science. Buckingham, UK: Open University press.
Hopkins, D. (1993). A teachers’ guide to classroom research (2nd ed.). Buckingham, Uk: Open University Press.
Jegede, O. J. (1995). Collateral learning and the eco-cultural paradigmin science and mathematics in Africa. Studies in Science Education, 25, 97–137.
Jegede, O. J. (1997). School science and the development of scientific culture: A review of contemporary science education in Africa. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 1–20.
Johnson, J. L., & Altheide, D. L. (1998). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 283–312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Johnstone, A. H., & Wham, A. J. B. (1982). The demands of practical work. Education in Chemistry, May, 71–73.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs: A theory of personality (Vol. I). New York: Norton.
Lagoke, B. A., Jegede, O. J., & Oyebanji, P. K. (1997). Towards an elimination of the gender gulf in science concept attainment through the use of environmental analogues. International Journal of Science Education, 19(4), 365–380.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design and interactive approach (Vol. 41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
Mudimbe, V. Y. (1988). The invention of Africa: Gnosis philosophy and the order of knowledge. London: James Currey.
Nashon, S. M. (2000). Teaching physics through analogies. OISE Papers in STSE Education, 1, 209–223.
Nashon, S. M., & Anderson, D. (in press). Obsession with ‘g’: A metacognitive reflection of a laboratory episode. Alberta Journal of Science Education.
Peshkin, A. (1993). The goodness of qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 322(2), 23–29.
Pittman, K. M. (1999). Student-generated analogies: Another way of knowing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 1–22.
Polanyi, M. (1974). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Posner, G., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
Prophet, B. R. (1990). Rhetoric and reality in science curriculum development in Botswana. International Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 13–23.
Schwandt, T. A. (1998). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 221–259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schwartz, D. L. (1993). The construction and analogical transfer of symbolic visualizations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1309–1325.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stake, R. (1998). Case studies In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 86–109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stallings, J., & Mohlman, G. (1988). Classroom observation techniques. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 469–474). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Stenhouse, L. (1988). Case study methods. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research methodology and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 49–53). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component process in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84(4), 353–378.
Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1994). An interpretive examination of high school chemistry teachers’ analogical explanation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(3), 227–242.
Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., Joslin, P., & Landauer, I. (1992). Science teachers’ use of analogues: Observations from classroom practice. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 413–422.
Walker, R. (1986). The conduct of educational case studies: Ethics, theory and procedures. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Controversies in classroom research (pp. 187–189). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Watts, M., & Bentley, D. (1994). Humanising and feminising school science: Reviving anthropomorphic and animistic thinking in constructivist science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 83–97.
Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zeitoun, H. H. (1984). Teaching scientific analogies: A proposed model. Research in Science and Technological Education, 2(2), 107–125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nashon, S.M. The Nature of Analogical Explanations: High School Physics Teachers Use in Kenya. Res Sci Educ 34, 475–502 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3229-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3229-4