Research on Chemical Intermediates

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 329–336 | Cite as

Preparation of nanocrystalline Fe-doped TiO2 powders as a visible-light-responsive photocatalyst



Nanocrystalline Fe-doped TiO2 powders were prepared using TiOSO4, urea, and Fe(NO3)3 · 9H2O as precursors through a hydrothermal method. The as-synthesized yellowish-colored powders are composed of anatase TiO2, identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The grain size ranged from 9.7 to 12.1 nm, calculated by Scherrer’s method. The specific surface area ranged from 141 to 170 m2/g, obtained by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrograph of the sample shows that the diameter of the grains is uniformly distributed at about 10 nm, which is consistent with that calculated by Scherrer’s method. Fe3+ and Fe2+ have been detected on the surface of TiO2 powders by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The UV–Vis diffuse reflection spectra indicate that the light absorption thresholds of the Fe-doped TiO2 powders have been red-shifted into the visible light region. The photocatalytic activity of the Fe-doped TiO2 was evaluated through the degradation of methylene blue (MB) under visible light irradiation. The Fe-doped TiO2 powders have shown good visible-light photocatalytic activities and the maximum degradation ratio is achieved within 4.5 h.


Fe-doped TiO2 Visible light Hydrothermal method 



The authors appreciate the financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 50772014 and by the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University under Grant No. NCET-07-0064.


  1. 1.
    J.A. Nozik, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 52, 193–232 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    U. Diebold, Surf. Sci. Rep. 48, 53–229 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.H. Kim, H.S. Honga, S.J. Kimb et al., J. Alloys Compd. 375, 259–264 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.O. Carneiro, V. Teixeiraa, A. Portinhaa et al., Vacuum 78, 37–46 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Zhang, Y. Li, S.L. Zhu et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 373, 333–337 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.Y. Choi, A. Termin, M.R. Hoffmann, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 13669–13679 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Karvinen, P. Hirva, T.A. Pakkanen, J. Mol. Struct.—THEOCHEM 626, 271 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.H. Chen, E.M. Kelder, J. Schoonman, Thin Solid Films 342, 35–41 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.F. Zhu, Z.G. Deng, F. Chen et al., J. Mol. Catal. A 216, 35–43 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Tong, J. Zhang, F. Chen et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 155, 572–579 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.B. Lambert, L. Xue, J.M. Winter, Archaeometry 32, 47 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Justicia, G. Garcia, L. Vazquez et al., Sens. Actuators B 109, 52–56 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Zhu, T. Shi, W. Liu et al., Physica B 396, 177–180 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Zhu, W. Zheng, B. He et al., J. Mol. Catal. A 216, 35–43 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Z. Li, W. Shen, W. He et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 155, 590–594 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media BV 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Inorganic Nonmetallic Materials, School of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations