The Effects of State Higher Education Policies and Institutions on Access by Economically Disadvantaged Students
Do state government policies and institutions promote access to postsecondary education by economically disadvantaged students? I analyze the number of state residents receiving federal Pell grants relative to the college-age population raised in low-income households. Using data for 1993–2008, I estimate separate models for total Pell recipients and for those enrolled in public, private nonprofit, and proprietary institutions. I find consistent evidence that state spending on both need- and merit-based financial aid enhances access by economically disadvantaged students, with the effects of need-based aid being larger and more robust than those of aid based at least in part on merit. I also find that students in states with consolidated governing boards have slightly greater access to public and nonprofit institutions than those with statewide coordinating boards. Enrollment by economically disadvantaged students in the public and proprietary sectors also responds to the opportunity costs of attending college, as measured by the state unemployment rate. I do not find evidence of direct effects from state policies limiting affirmative action, or political elites’ ideology.
KeywordsStudent access State financial aid Education inequality Economically disadvantaged students Higher education governance
- An Hereditary Meritocracy, The Economist, January 24–30, 2015, 17–20.Google Scholar
- Berdahl, R. O. (1971). Statewide coordination of higher education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
- Callan, P. M. (2011). Reframing access and opportunity: Public policy dimensions. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 87–105). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Delaney, J. A., & Doyle, W. R. (2011). State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time. Journal of Education Finance, 36(Spring), 343–368.Google Scholar
- Education Commission of the States. (2017). 50-State comparison: Postsecondary governance structures. Retrieved 21 June, 2017, from http://www.ecs.org/postsecondary-governance-structures/.
- Flores, S. M. (2010). State dream acts: The effect of in-state tuition policies and undocumented latino students. The Review of Higher Education, 33(Winter), 239–283.Google Scholar
- Georgia Student Finance Commission. (2017). HOPE Scholarship eligible institutions FY 2017. Retrieved 19 June, 2017, from https://www.gafutures.org/media/113357/hope-scholarship-eligible-institutions.pdf.
- Hoxby, C. M. (1997). How the changing market structure of U.S. higher education explains college tuition. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 6323, December.Google Scholar
- Kane, T. J. (1999). The price of admission: rethinking how Americans pay for college. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Mettler, S. (2014). Degrees of inequality: How higher education politics sabotaged the American dream. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs. (1993–1994 through 2008–2009). Annual survey report on state-sponsored student financial aid. Washington, DC: NASSGAP.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2017a). Data Lab. Retrieved 18 June, 2017, from https://nces.ed.gov/datalab/.
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2017b). IPEDS analytics: Delta cost Project Database. Retrieved 27 September, 2017, from https://deltacostproject.org/delta-cost-project-database.
- National Conference of State Legislatures. (2014). Affirmative action: State action. Retrieved 7 August, 2015, from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/affirmative-action-state-action.aspx.
- National Conference of State Legislatures. (2015). Tuition benefits for immigrants. Retrieved 7 August, 2015, from http://www.ncsl.org/research/immigration/tuition-benefits-for-immigrants.aspx.
- Postsecondary Education Opportunity. (2015). Policy Research Spreadsheets. Retrieved 2 June, 2015, from http://www.postsecondary.org/spreadslist.asp.
- Snyder, T. & Musu-Gillette, L. (2015). Free or reduced price lunch: A proxy for poverty? NCES Blog, April 16. Retrieved 15 August, 2017, from https://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/post/free-or-reduced-price-lunch-a-proxy-for-poverty.
- Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (2017). Research and Project Grants. Retrieved 7 July, 2017, from http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=B85D3933-C8DB-F8A6-3E2C2992B67B1058.
- Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (2016). Closing the gaps final progress report. Retrieved 7 July, 2017, from http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/reports/PDF/8138.PDF?CFID=62655686&CFTOKEN=47774728.
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). State employment and unemployment archived news releases. Retrieved 3 March, 2018, from https://www.bls.gov/bls/news-release/laus.htm.
- U.S. Department of Education. (1993–1994 through 2008–2009). Federal pell grant program end of year report. Retrieved 26 June, 2017, from https://www2.ed.gov/finaid/prof/resources/data/pell-data.html.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2009). The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Education Jobs and Reform. Retrieved 2 December, 2015, from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/leg/recovery/factsheet/overview.html.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Federal student aid. Retrieved 22 December, 2018, from https://studentaid.ed.gov/sa/eligibility/non-us-citizens.
- U.S. Bureau of the Census. Various years. Statistical Abstract of the United States. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/time-series/statistical_abstracts.html.
- Zumeta, W. (2001). State policies and private higher education in the USA: Understanding the variation in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 13(August), 425–442.Google Scholar