The Longitudinal Connections Between Undergraduate High Impact Curriculum Practices and Civic Engagement in Adulthood

Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

There is concern that civic engagement in the U.S. has declined recently especially among the younger generations. It is known that one of the strongest predictors of civic engagement is education level, where those with at least a college degree typically have the highest levels of civic engagement. There is also emerging evidence that college curriculum experiences have the potential to instill pro-civic dispositions. In this study, we improved on and advanced past research that examined the associations between undergraduate curriculum experiences and civic engagement. We used cohort and longitudinal data from the 2002–2012 Education Longitudinal Study to test whether experiences in six different high impact practices (HIP) as well as in the number of HIP predicted levels of civic engagement later in adulthood. Based on a series of binomial regression analyses, we found that experiences in HIP significantly predicted higher levels of civic engagement later in adulthood, especially for students who entered college with low levels of pro-civic orientations. Some of these longitudinal relationships were adjusted downward after controlling for precollege selection factors, other college experiences, and other adult outcomes. Still, the significant influence of these undergraduate HIP experiences persisted into adulthood suggesting that individuals carry their curriculum involvements into their post-college transitions including that of being engaged in their communities.

Keywords

Curriculum practices Civic engagement High impact practices Longitudinal data 

References

  1. Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U). (2012). A crucible moment: College learning and democracy’s future. Washington, DC: AAC&U.Google Scholar
  2. Astin, A. W. (2005). Making sense out of degree completion rates. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice, 7(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astin, A. W., & Antonio, A. L. (2012). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Astin, A. W., Sax, L. J., & Avalos, J. (1999). Long-term effects of volunteerism during the undergraduate years. Review of Higher Education, 22(2), 187–202.Google Scholar
  5. Ballard, P. J. (2014). What motivates youth civic engagement? Journal of Adolescent Research, 29, 439–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnhardt, C. L., Sheets, J. E., & Pasquesi, K. (2015). You expect what? Perceptions as resources in acquiring commitments and capacities for civic engagement. Research in Higher Education, 56, 622–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, E. A., Cordner, A., Klein, P. T., Savell, S., & Baiocchi, G. (2014). Disavowing politics: Civic engagement in an era of political skepticism. American Journal of Sociology, 119(2), 518–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bensimon, E. M. (2007). The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship on student success. Review of Higher Education, 30, 441–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowman, N. A. (2011). Promoting participation in a diverse democracy: A meta-analysis of college diversity experiences and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 29–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryer, T. A. (2014). Higher education beyond job creation: Universities, citizenship, and community. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  11. Bureau, D. A., Cole, J. S., & McCormick, A. C. (2014). Frequent participation in service learning: Examining institutional differences and individual benefits. New Directions for Institutional Research, 162, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Model inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 261–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2015). Panel count data. In Badi H. Baltagi (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of panel data (pp. 233–256). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Campaign for the Civic Mission of Schools. (2011). Guardian of democracy: The civic mission of schools. Philadelphia, PA: The Leonore Annenberg Institute for Civics.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, D. E. (2009). Civic engagement and education: An empirical test of the sorting model. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 771–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, S. M., & Nutt, C. L. (2008). Academic advising in the new global century: Supporting student engagement and learning outcomes. Peer Review, 10(1), 4–7.Google Scholar
  17. Chang, M. J., Astin, A. W., & Kim, D. (2004). Cross-racial interaction among under-graduates: Some consequences, causes, and patterns. Research in Higher Education, 45, 529–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1999). Development and adaptations of the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Beaumont, E., & Stephens, J. (2003). Educating citizens: Preparing America’s undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Cole, D., & Zhou, J. (2014). Do diversity experiences help college students become more civicially minded? Applying Banks multicultural education framework. Innovative Higher Education, 39, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Denson, N. (2009). Do curricular and co-curricular diversity activities influence racial bias? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 805–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Derose, K. P., & Varda, D. M. (2009). Social capital and health care access a systematic review. Medical Care Research and Review, 66(3), 272–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ehrlich, T. (Ed.). (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  24. Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Enders, C. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Everett, E. (2011). How civic engagement transforms community relationships. InFocus, 43(4), 1–16.Google Scholar
  28. Fine, T. (2014). Young-adult voting: An analysis of presidential elections, 1964–2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  29. Finlay, A. (2011). Assessment of high impact practices: Using findings to drive change in the Compass Project. Peer Review, 13(2), 29–33.Google Scholar
  30. Finlay, A., & McNair, T. (2013). Assessing underserved students’ engagement in high-impact practices. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  31. Flanagan, C. A. (2003). Developmental roots of political engagement. PS. Political Science and Politics, 36(2), 257–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Flanagan, C. A., & Levine, P. (2010). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. Future of Children, 20(1), 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Flanagan, C. A., Levine, P., & Settersten, R. (2009). Civic engagement and the changing transition to adulthood., CIRCLE Monograph Medford, MA: Tufts University.Google Scholar
  34. Griffith, J., & Thomas, T. (2014). Do college youth serve others? How and under which circumstances? Implications for promoting community service. New Directions for Institutional Research, 162, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gurin, P., Nagada, B. A., & Lopez, G. E. (2004). The benefits of diversity in education for democratic citizenship. Journal of Social Issues, 60(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hansen, M. J., & Schmidt, L. (2017). The synergy and readiness for high-impact practices during the first year of college. Journal of The First-Year Experiences & Students in Transition, 29, 57–82.Google Scholar
  38. Hart, D., Donnelly, T. M., Youniss, J., & Atkins, R. (2007). High school community service as a predictor of adult voting and volunteering. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hatch, D. K. (2012). Unpacking the black box of student engagement: The need for programmatic investigation of high impact practices. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36, 903–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hilbe, J. M. (2014). Modeling count data. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hinterlong, J. E., & Williamson, A. (2006). The effects of civic engagement on current and future cohorts of older adults. Generations, 30(4), 10–17.Google Scholar
  42. Hirshorn, B. A., & Settersen, R. A., Jr. (2013). Civic involvement across the life course: Moving beyond age-based assumptions. Advances in Life Course Research, 18, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Horowitz, J. (2015). Doing less with more: Cohorts, education, and civic participation in America. Social Forces, 94(2), 747–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hurtado, S., & DeAngelo, L. (2012). Linking diversity and civic-minded practices with student outcomes: New evidence from national surveys. Liberal Education, 98, 14–23.Google Scholar
  45. Hyman, J. B. (2002). Exploring social capital and civic engagement to create a framework for community building. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ingels, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Alexander, C. P., Jewell, D. M., Lauff, E., Mattox, T. L., et al. (2014). Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS:2002) third follow-up data file documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  47. Ishitani, T. T., & McKitrick, S. A. (2013). The effects of academic programs and institutional characteristics on postgraduate civic engagement behavior. Journal of College Student Development, 54(4), 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnson, S. K., Agans, J. P., Weiner, M. B., & Lerner, R. M. (2014). Profiles of civic engagement across educational transitions: Stability and Change. International Journal of Developmental Science, 8, 81–93.Google Scholar
  49. Kadlec, A., Immerwahr, J., & Gupta, J. (2013). Guided pathways to student success: Perspectives from Indiana college students & advisors. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Commission for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  50. Kligo, C. A., Ezell Sheets, J. K., & Pascarella, E. T. (2015). The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence. Higher Education, 69, 509–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  52. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. C. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations: ASHE higher education report (Vol. 32, no.5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Kuh, G. D., & O’Donnell, K. (2013). Ensuring quality & taking high-impact practices to scale. Washington, DC: AAC&U.Google Scholar
  54. Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Nagin, D. S. (1996). A comparison of Poisson, negative binomial, and semiparametric mixed Poisson regression models with empirical applications to criminal careers data. Sociological Methods & Research, 24, 387–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lauff, E., & Ingels, S. J. (2014). Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS:2002): A first look at 2002 high school sophomores 10 years later. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.Google Scholar
  56. Lefkovits, P. M., Pinsoneault, L. T., Bonbright, D., & Nguyen, L. T. (2011). Measuring the impact of civic engagement: Tracking outcomes in health, education, and economic security. Washington, DC: Alliance for Children and Families.Google Scholar
  57. Martin, J. M., & Strawser, M. G. (2017). Transforming the capstone: Transformative learning as a pedagogical framework and vehicle for ethical reflection in the capstone course. Journal of Faculty Development, 31, 25–34.Google Scholar
  58. McIlrath, L., Lyons, A., & Munck, R. (2012). Higher education and civic engagement: Comparative perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Morin, C., & Stanley, C. (2017). Connecting high-impact practices, scholarly and creative teaching, and faculty development: An interview with Dr. Aaron Thompson. The Journal of Faculty Development, 31, 13–18.Google Scholar
  60. Morphew, C. C., & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2008). Community colleges: Special supplement to the condition of education 2008 (NCES 2008-033). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.Google Scholar
  62. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2016). Digest of education statistics: 2015 (NCES 2016-014). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.Google Scholar
  63. National Survey of Student Engagement. (2013). A fresh look at student engagement—annual results 2013. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.Google Scholar
  64. Nelson Laird, T., Shroup, R., Kuh, G., & Schwartz, M. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49, 469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Newell, M. A. (2014). What’s a degree got to do with it? The civic engagement of associate’s and bachelor’s degree holders. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(2), 67–89.Google Scholar
  66. Nover, A., Godsay, S., Kirby, E. H., & Kawashima-Ginsberg, K. (2010). Electoral engagement and college experience. CIRCLE fact sheet. Medford, MA: Tufts University.Google Scholar
  67. Oesterle, S., Kirkpatrick Johnson, M., & Mortimer, J. T. (2004). Volunteerism during the transition to adulthood: A life course perspective. Social Forces, 82(3), 1123–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Orelien, J.G. (2001). Model fitting in PROC GENMOD, Paper 264-26. SUGI Proceedings 26. http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi26/p264-26.pdf.
  69. Padgett, R. D., Keup, J. R., & Pascarella, E. T. (2013). The impact of first-year seminars on college students’ life-long learning orientations. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 50, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  71. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reich, J. N. (Ed.). (2014). Civic engagement, civic development, and higher education. Washington, DC: Association for American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  73. Robinson, K. J., & Roska, J. (2016). Counselors, information, and high school college-going culture: Inequalities in the college application process. Research in Higher Education, 57, 845–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rotolo, T., & Wilson, J. (2004). What happened to the “long civic generation”? Explaining cohort differences in volunteerism. Social Forces, 82(3), 1091–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smith, C. L., & Allen, J. M. (2014). Does contact with advisors predict judgments and attitudes consistent with student success? A multi-institutional study. NACADA Journal, 34(1), 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sutton, A., Bosky, A., & Muller, C. (2016). Manufacturing gender inequality in the new economy: High school training for work in blue-collar communities. American Sociological Review, 81, 720–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Swecker, H. K., Fifolt, M., & Searby, L. (2013). Academic advising and first-generation college students: A quantitative study on student retention. NACADA Journal, 33, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Syvertsen, A. K., Wray-Lake, L., Flanagan, C. A., Osgood, D. W., & Briddell, L. (2011). Thirty-year trends in U.S. adolescents’ civic engagement: A story of changing participation and educational differences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 586–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tukibayeva, M., & Gonyea, R. M. (2014). High-impact practices and the first-year student. New Directions for Institutional Research, 160, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Freeman, E. C. (2012). Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966-2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1045–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Advancing civic learning and engagement in democracy: A road map and call to action. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  83. U.S. Department of Education. (2016). WWC intervention report: A summary of findings from a systemic review of the evidence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  84. von Hippel, P. T. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37, 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wedel, M., Bockenholt, U., & Kamakura, W. (2003). Factor models for multivariate count data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 87(2), 356–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Weerts, D. J., & Cabrera, A. F. (2015). Understanding civic identity in college. Journal of College and Character, 16(1), 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wethington, E., Cooper, H., & Holmes, C. S. (1997). Turning points in midlife. In Ian H. Gotlib & Blair Wheaton (Eds.), Stress and adversity of the life course (pp. 215–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wicks, R. H., Wicks, J. L., Morimoto, S. A., Maxwell, A., & Schulte, S. R. (2014). Correlates of political and civic engagement among youth during the 2012 presidential campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(5), 622–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Winston, F. (2015). Reflections upon community engagement: Service-learning and its effect on political participation after college. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19, 79–103.Google Scholar
  90. Woolard, C. (2017). Engaging civic engagement: Framing the civic education movement in higher education. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  91. Young, D. G., & Hopp, J. M. (2014). 2012-2013 National survey of first-year seminars: Exploring high-impact practices in the first college year. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carrie B. Myers
    • 1
  • Scott M. Myers
    • 2
  • Martha Peters
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EducationMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA
  3. 3.Departments of Education and NursingMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA

Personalised recommendations