National Evidence of the Impact of First-Year Online Enrollment on Postsecondary Students’ Long-Term Academic Outcomes

Article

Abstract

This study examines the influence of first-year online enrollment on the long-term academic outcomes of postsecondary students. Using a nationally representative sample and propensity score weighting, I find that enrolling in some online courses is associated with lower odds of dropping out of college. Additional results reveal a positive relationship between enrolling in some online courses and sub-baccalaureate indicators of long-term academic success, such as earning an associate’s degree and transferring from a community college to a 4-year institution.

Keywords

Online education Propensity score weighting Long-term academic success Degree completion Vertical transfer 

References

  1. Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. United States Department of Education.Google Scholar
  2. Adelman, C. (2004). Principal indicators of student academic histories in postsecondary education. United States Department of Education.Google Scholar
  3. Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. United States Department of Education.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, E. & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. The Sloan Consortium.Google Scholar
  5. American Federation of Teachers. (2003). Student persistence in college: More than counting caps and gowns. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.Google Scholar
  6. Ary, E., & Brune, C. (2011). A comparison of student learning outcomes in traditional and online personal finance courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 465–474.Google Scholar
  7. Bean, J., & Metzner, B. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55, 485–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowen, W. (2013). Higher education in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cejda, B. D., & Kaylor, A. J. (2001). Early transfer: A case study of traditional-aged community college students. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 25(8), 621–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheslock, J., Ortagus, J., Umbricht, M., & Wymore, J. (2016). The cost of producing higher education: An exploration of theory, evidence, and institutional policy. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 31). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Daymont, T., & Blau, G. (2008). Student performance in online and traditional sections of an undergraduate management course. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9(3), 275.Google Scholar
  14. Deming, D. J., Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Yuchtman, N. (2015). Can online learning bend the higher education cost curve? The American Economic Review, 105(5), 496–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dougherty, K. J. (2002). The evolving role of the community college: Policy issues and research questions. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 17). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology, 40(4), 312–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DuGoff, E. H., Schuler, M., & Stuart, E. A. (2014). Generalizing observational study results: Applying propensity score methods to complex surveys. Health Services Research, 49(1), 284–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enriquez, A. (2010) Assessing the effectiveness of synchronous content delivery in an online introductory circuits analysis course. In Proceedings from the annual conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, Kentucky.Google Scholar
  19. Figlio, D., Rush, M., & Lu, Y. (2013). Is it live or is it internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(4), 763–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flores, S. M., & Park, T. J. (2015). The effect of enrolling in a minority-serving institution for Black and Hispanic students in Texas. Research in Higher Education, 56(3), 247–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fonte, R. (2011). The community college alternative. Academic Questions, 24(4), 419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gonzalez, A., & Hilmer, M. J. (2006). The role of 2-year colleges in the improving situation of Hispanic postsecondary education. Economic of Education Review, 25(3), 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guo, S., & Fraser, M. (2015). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Hagedorn, L. S., Cypers, S., & Lester, J. (2008). Looking in the review mirror: Factors affecting transfer for urban community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 32, 643–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2010). Online Learning in the Virginia Community College System. Community College Research Center, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  27. Jenkins, D., & Fink, J. (2016). Tracking transfer: New measures of institutional and state effectiveness in helping community college students attain bachelor’s degrees. Community College Research Center, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  28. Lack, K. (2013). Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education. Ithaka S-R.Google Scholar
  29. Lewis, J., & Harrison, M. (2012). Online delivery as a course adjunct promotes active learning and student success. Teaching of Psychology, 39(1), 72–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–47.Google Scholar
  31. Mentzer, G., Cryan, J., & Teclehaimanot, B. (2007). Two peas in a pod? A comparison of face- to-face and web-based classrooms. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 233–246.Google Scholar
  32. Meyer, K. A. (2006). Cost-efficiencies in online learning. ASHE Higher Education Report, Volume 32, Number 1. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(1), 1–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olson, T., & Wisher, R. (2002). The effectiveness of web-based instruction: An initial inquiry. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(2).Google Scholar
  34. Ortagus, J. (2017). From the periphery to prominence: An examination of the changing profile of online students in American higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Poirier, C., & Feldman, R. (2004). Teaching in cyberspace: Online versus traditional instruction using a waiting-list experimental design. Teaching of Psychology, 31(1), 59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational studies. In Observational studies (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rubin, D. B. (2001). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3–4), 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sener, J. (2012). The seven futures of American education: Improving learning and teaching in a screen-captured world. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.Google Scholar
  41. Shadish, W. R., Clark, M. H., & Steiner, P. M. (2008). Can nonrandomized experiments yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random and nonrandom assignments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1334–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Does online learning impede degree completion? A national study of community college students. Computers & Education, 75, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Silverman, S., Aliabadi, S., & Stiles, M. (2009). Meeting the needs of commuter, part-time, transfer, and returning students. In S. Harper & S. Quaye (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Summers, J., Waigandt, A., & Whittaker, T. (2005). A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education, 29(3), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Townsend, B. K. (2001). Redefining the community college transfer mission. Community College Review, 29(2), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Urtel, M. (2008). Assessing academic performance between traditional and distance education course formats. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 322–330.Google Scholar
  48. Wagner, S., Garippo, S., & Lovaas, P. (2011). A longitudinal comparison of online versus traditional instruction. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 30–42.Google Scholar
  49. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2011). The effectiveness of distance education across Virginia’s community colleges: Evidence from introductory college-level math and English courses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 360–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2013). The impact of online learning on students’ course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system. Economics of Education Review, 37, 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 633–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu, D., Jaggars, S. S., & Fletcher, J. (2016). How and why does two-year college entry influence baccalaureate aspirants’ academic and labor market outcomes? A CAPSEE Working Paper. Center for Analysis of Postsecondary Education and Employment.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher Education Administration & PolicyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations