Managing Institutional Research Advancement: Implications from a University Faculty Time Allocation Study
- 752 Downloads
While much is known about faculty time allocation, we know very little about how traditional managerial factors influence faculty time allocation behaviors. We know even less about the possible downsides associated with relying on these traditional managerial factors. Using survey data from the National Science Foundation/Department of Energy Survey of Academic Researchers, our study predicts faculty time allocations to grant writing as a function of pressure from administrative superiors. We then examine how pressure from administrative superiors influences faculty job satisfaction and the likelihood to pursue uninteresting research grants. Our findings indicate that faculty time spent pursuing grants increases in response to pressure from administrative superiors but that this same pressure is associated also associated with increases in pursuit of uninteresting research grants as well as decreases in work satisfaction. Our study contributes to better understanding of the merits and limitations of traditional, hierarchical approaches to managing university faculty behavior.
KeywordsHigher education research institutions Research and development Grantsmanship Faculty time allocation
We acknowledge the assistance of graduate research assistants of the James M. Hull College of Business at Georgia Regents University.
- AAUP. American Association of University Professors (1994). On the relationship of faculty governance to academic freedom. AAUP Policies and Reports. Available online: http://www.aaup.org/report/relationship-faculty-governance-academic-freedom. Accessed 07 Sept 2014.
- Allen, S. D., Link, A. N., & Rosenbaum, D. T. (2007). Entrepreneurship and human capital: Evidence of patenting activity from the academic sector. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 31(6), 937–951.Google Scholar
- Bentley, P. J., Coates, H., Dobson, I. R., Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, V. L. (2013). Academic job satisfaction from an international comparative perspective: Factors associated with satisfaction across 12 countries. Job Satisfaction around the Academic World (p. 239). doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5434-8_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blau, P. (1973). The organization of academic work. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Blau, Peter M. (1994). The organization of academic work. NewBrunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.Google Scholar
- Boyer, P. (1997). Factors influencing College of Education faculty in pursuing grants. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/mo/fullcit?p9841267. Accessed 07 Sept 2014.
- Boyer, P., & Cockriel, I. (1998). Factors influencing grant writing: Perceptions of tenured and nontenured faculty. SRA Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 29(3), 61–68.Google Scholar
- Boyer, P., & Cockriel, I. (1999). Women faculty pursuing grants: Gender differences. Advancing Women in Leadership. http://www.advancingwomen.com/awl/winter99/boyer.html. Accessed 07 Sept 2014.
- Boyer, P., & Cockriel, I. (2001). Grant performance of junior faculty across disciplines: Motivators and barriers. Journal of Research Administration, 2(1), 19–23.Google Scholar
- Caplow, T., & McGee, R. J. (1958). The academic marketplace. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Churchman, D. A., & Hellweg, S. A. (1981). The faculty is not in our stars: Self-generated obstacles to securing grants. Grants Magazine, 4(2), 106–110.Google Scholar
- Clark, B. R. (1987). The academic life: small worlds, different worlds. A Carnegie Foundation Special Report. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Cole, J. R. (2009). Defending academic freedom and free inquiry. Social Research, 76(3), 811–844.Google Scholar
- Daniel, L. G., & Gallaher, I. (1990). Impediments to faculty involvement in grant-related activities: A case study. SRA Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 16, 5–13.Google Scholar
- Dooley, L. M. (1995). Barriers and inducements to grant related activity by a college of education faculty. Research Management Review, 7(2), 10–24.Google Scholar
- Easterly, D. C., & Pemberton, L. A. (2008). Understanding barriers and supports to proposal writing as perceived by female associate professors: Achieving promotion to professor. Research Management Review, 16(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
- Hardré, P. L., Beesley, A. D., Miller, R. L., & Pace, T. M. (2011). Faculty motivation to do research: Across disciplines in research-extensive universities. Journal of the Professoriate, 5(1), 35–69.Google Scholar
- Jarvis, P. (2013). Universities and corporate universities: The higher learning industry in global society. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lechuga, V. M., & Lechuga, D. C. (2012). Faculty motivation and scholarly work: Self-determination and self-regulation perspectives. Journal of the Professoriate, 6(2), 59–97.Google Scholar
- Mamiseishvili, K., & Rosser, V. J. (2011). Examining the relationship between faculty productivity and job satisfaction. Journal of The Professoriate, 5(2), 100–132.Google Scholar
- Middaugh, M. F. (2001). Understanding faculty productivity: Standards and benchmarks for colleges and universities. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Monahan, T. C. (1993). Barriers and inducements to grant-related activity by New Jersey State college faculty. SRA Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 24(4), 9–26.Google Scholar
- Monahan, T. C. (1995). Using institutional variables to predict success in the acquisition of sponsored projects. Research Management Review, 8(1), 23–40.Google Scholar
- Mustapha, N. (2013). The influence of financial reward on job satisfaction among academic staffs at public universities in Kelantan, Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(3), 244–248.Google Scholar
- Perorazio, T. E. (2009). Curiosity and Commercialization: Faculty Perspectives on Sponsored Research, Academic Science and Research Agendas. ProQuest LLC, Dissertation.Google Scholar
- Sarewitz, D. (2003). Does science policy exist, and if so, does it matter: Some observations on the U.S. R&D budget. Discussion Paper for Earth Institute Science, Technology, and Global Development Seminar, April 8, 2003. http://archive.cspo.org/products/papers/budget_seminar.pdf. Accessed 08 Sept 2014.
- Schoenfeld, A. C., & Magnan, R. (1994). Mentoring in a manual: Climbing the academic ladder to tenure (2nd ed.). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.Google Scholar
- Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1/2), 115–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sterner, A. (1999). Faculty attitudes toward involvement in grant-related activities at a Predominantly Undergraduate Institution (PUI). SRA Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 31(1), 5–15.Google Scholar
- Trowler, P., & Becher, T. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Walden, P. R., & Bryan, V. C. (2010). Tenured and non-tenured college of education faculty motivators and barriers in grant writing: A public university in the south. Journal of Research Administration, 41(3), 85–98.Google Scholar
- Washburn, J. (2011). Academic freedom and the corporate university. Academe, 97(1), 8–13.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar