Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 664–692 | Cite as

Modeling Entrance into STEM Fields of Study Among Students Beginning at Community Colleges and Four-Year Institutions

  • Xueli Wang
Article

Abstract

In this study, a theoretical model is tested to examine factors shaping the decision to pursue STEM fields of study among students entering community colleges and four-year institutions, based on a nationally representative sample of high school graduates from 2004. Applying the social cognitive career theory and multi-group structural equation modeling analysis, this research highlights a number of findings that may point to specific points of intervention along students’ educational pathway into STEM. This study also reveals important heterogeneity in the effects of high school and postsecondary variables based on where students start their postsecondary education: community colleges or four-year institutions. For example, while high school exposure to math and science courses appears to be a strong influence on four-year beginners’ STEM interest, its impact on community college beginners’ STEM interest, albeit being positive, is much smaller. In addition, college academic integration and financial aid receipt exhibit differential effects on STEM entrance, accruing more to four-year college students and less to those starting at community colleges.

Keywords

Community college students STEM education Choice of major Social cognitive career theory Multi-group structural equation modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the Association for Institutional Research, the National Center for Education Statistics, the National Science Foundation, and the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative under Association for Institutional Research Grant Number RG11-07. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Association for Institutional Research, the National Center for Education Statistics, the National Science Foundation or the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative. I thank Kelly Wickersham, Hsun-yu Chan, and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable and insightful feedback.

References

  1. ACT. (2006). Developing the STEM education pipeline. Iowa City, IA: ACT.Google Scholar
  2. Adelman, C. (1998). Women and men of the engineering path: A model for analysis of undergraduate careers. Retrieved from http://www.erc-assoc.org/nsf/engrg_paths/EPMONOG.pdf. Retrieved 20 Mar 2012.
  3. Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, J., & Robbins, S. (2008). Prediction of college major persistence based on vocational interests and first-year academic performance. Research in Higher Education, 49(1), 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, E., & Kim, D. (2006). Increasing the success of minority students in science and technology. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  6. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 887–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Austin, A. E. (1990). Faculty cultures, faculty values. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Assessing academic climates and cultures (Vol. 68, pp. 61–74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Bahr, P. R. (2008). Does mathematics remediation work?: A comparative analysis of academic attainment among community college students. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 420–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bailey, T. R., & Alfonso, M. (2005). Paths to persistence: An analysis of research on program effectiveness at community colleges (New Agenda Series Vol. 6, No. 1). Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education. Retrieved from http://www.luminafoundation.org/publications/PathstoPersistence.pdf. Retrieved 20 Mar 2012.
  12. Bailey, T. R., Calcagno, J. C., Jenkins, D., Kienzl, G., & Leinbach, T. (2005). Community college student success: What institutional characteristics make a difference? Retrieved from http://cfder.org/uploads/3/0/4/9/3049955/community_college_student_success_what_institutional_characteristics_make_a_difference.pdf. Retrieved 20 Mar 2012.
  13. Bailey, T. R., Jenkins, D., & Leinbach, T. (2005). Graduation rates, student goals, and measuring community college effectiveness (CCRC Brief No. 28). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  14. Bailey, T. R., Leinbach, D. T., Scott, M., Alfonso, M., Kienzl, G. S., & Kennedy, B. (2003). The characteristics of occupational sub-baccalaureate students entering the new millennium. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  15. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Benitez, M. (1998). Hispanic-serving institutions: Challenges and opportunities. In J. P. Merisotis & C. T. O’Brient (Eds.), New directions for higher education (No. 104, pp. 57–68). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Berglund, P. A. (2010). An introduction to multiple imputation of complex sample data using SAS v9.2. SAS Global Forum 2010, Paper 265-2010. Retrieved from http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings10/265-2010.pdf. Retrieved 20 Mar 2012.
  18. Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23(3), 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boswell, K. (2004). Bridges or barriers? Public policy and the community college transfer function. Change, 36(6), 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bryant, A. (2001). ERIC review: Community college students: Recent findings and trends. Community College Review, 29(3), 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burke, R., & Mattis, M. (2007). Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Byars-Winston, A. M., & Fouad, N. A. (2008). Math and science social cognitive variables in college students: Contributions of contextual factors in predicting goals. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(4), 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Chang, J. C. (2005). Faculty–student interaction at the community college: A focus on students of color. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 769–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen, X., & Weko, T. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES 2009-161). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  26. Cohen, A., & Brawer, F. (2008). The American community college (5th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology—CPST. (2007). Is US science and technology adrift? Washington, DC: CPST. Retrieved from http://www.cpst.org/STEM/STEM8_Report.pdf. Retrieved 20 Mar 2012.
  28. Crisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic Serving Institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 924–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dayton, B., Gonzalez-Vasquez, N., Martinez, C. R., & Plum, C. (2004). In A. Ortiz (Ed.), New directions for student services (No. 105, pp. 29–39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. de Cohen, C. C., & Deterding, N. (2009). Widening the net: National estimates of gender disparities in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Deil-Amen, R. (2011). Socio-academic integrative moments: Rethinking academic and social integration among two-year college students in career-related programs. Journal of Higher Education, 82(1), 54–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. DesJardins, S., Ahlburg, D., & McCall, B. P. (2006). An integrated model of application, admission, enrollment, and financial aid. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 381–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dowd, A. C. (2008). The community college as gateway and gatekeeper: Moving beyond the access “saga” to outcome equity. Harvard Educational Review, 77(4), 407–419.Google Scholar
  34. Dowd, A. C. (2011). Developing supportive STEM community college to four-year college and university transfer ecosystems. In S. Olson & J. B. Labov (Eds.), Community colleges in the evolving STEM education landscape (pp. 107–134). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  35. Dowd, A. C., & Coury, T. (2006). The effect of loans on the persistence and attainment of community college students. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hagedorn, L. S., & DuBray, D. (2010). Math and science success and nonsuccess: Journeys within the community college. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(1), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hagedorn, L. S., & Lester, J. (2006). Hispanic community college students and the transfer game: Strikes, misses, and grand slam experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30(10), 827–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall, C., Dickerson, J., Batts, D., Kauffmann, P., & Bosse, M. (2011). Are we missing opportunities to encourage interest in STEM fields? Journal of Technology Education, 23(1), 32–46.Google Scholar
  39. Hardy, D., & Katsinas, S. (2010). Changing STEM associate’s degree production in public associates’ colleges from 1985 to 2005: Exploring institutional type, gender, and field of study. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(1), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heinze, N., & Hu, Q. (2009). Why college undergraduates choose IT: A multi-theoretical perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(5), 462–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Herrera, F. A., & Hurtado, S. (2011, April). Maintaining initial interests: Developing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) career aspirations among underrepresented racial minority students. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Research annual meeting, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  42. Herrera, F. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. (2011). Maintaining career aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) among college students. Retrieved from http://www.heri.ucla.edu/nih/downloads/ASHE2011HerreraSTEMCareers.pdf. Retrieved 20 Mar 2012.
  43. Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.Google Scholar
  46. Horton, N. J., & Lipsitz, S. R. (2001). Multiple imputation in practice: Comparison of software packages for regression models with missing variables. The American Statistician, 55(3), 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hurtado, S., Eagan, K., & Hughes, B. (2012, June). Priming the pump or sieve: Institutional contexts and URM STEM degree attainments. Paper presented at the Association for Institutional Research annual forum, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  49. Ignash, J. M., & Townsend, B. K. (2000). Evaluating state-level articulation agreements according to good practice. Community College Review, 28(3), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ishitani, T. T., & DesJardins, S. L. (2002). A longitudinal investigation of dropout from colleges in the United States. Journal of College Student Retention, 4(2), 173–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kane, T. J., & Rouse, C. E. (1999). The community college: Educating students at the margin between college and work. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Karp, M. M., Hughes, K. L., & O’Gara, L. (2008). An exploration of Tinto’s integration framework for community college students. CCRC Working Paper No. 12. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  55. Kohen, A. I., Nestel, G., & Karmas, C. (1978). Factors affecting individual persistence rates in undergraduate college programs. American Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change, 35(2), 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Laanan, F. (2003). Degree aspirations of two-year college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27(6), 495–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Laden, B. V. (2001). Hispanic-serving institutions: Myths and realities. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(1), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lamport, M. A. (1993). Student–faculty informal interaction and the effect on college student outcomes: A review of the literature. Adolescence, 28(112), 971–990.Google Scholar
  60. Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Beede, D., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration. Retrieved from: http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/reports/documents/stemfinalyjuly14_1.pdf. Retrieved 20 Mar 2012.
  61. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1996). Career development from a social cognitive perspective. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (3rd ed., pp. 373–421). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  63. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (pp. 255–311). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  65. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H., & Treistman, D. (2003). Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(4), 458–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Sheu, H., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Gloster, C. S., … Treistman, D. (2005). Social cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering: Utility for women and students at historically Black universities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(1), 84–92.Google Scholar
  67. Leppel, K. (2002). Similarities and differences in the college persistence of men and women. Review of Higher Education, 25(4), 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lester, J. (2010). Women in male-dominated career and technical education programs at community colleges: Barriers to participation and success. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(1), 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Long, B. T. (2005). The remediation debate: Are we serving the needs of underprepared college students? National CrossTalk, 13(4), 11–12.Google Scholar
  70. Lowell, B. L., & Regets, M. (2006). A half-century snapshot of the STEM workforce, 19502000. Washington, DC: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.cpst.org/STEM/STEM_White1.pdf. Retrieved 20 Mar 2012.
  71. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Malcolm, L. E., & Dowd, A. C. (2012). The impact of undergraduate debt on the graduate school enrollment of STEM baccalaureates. Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 265–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Maple, S. A., & Stage, F. K. (1991). Influences on the choice of math/science major by gender and ethnicity. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Millar, B. (2010). Community college students’ perceptions of academic readiness. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest dissertations and theses (Dissertation/thesis No. 3422728).Google Scholar
  75. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  76. Nakajima, M. (2008). What factors influence student persistence in the community college setting? Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(9-A), 3455.Google Scholar
  77. National Academies 2005 “Rising Above the Gathering Storm” Committee. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm: Rapidly approaching Category 5. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  78. National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering. (2012). Community colleges in the evolving STEM education landscape: Summary of a summit. Steve Olson and Jay B. Labov, Rapporteurs. Planning Committee on Evolving Relationships and Dynamics Between Two- and Four-Year Colleges and Universities, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Division on Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Life Sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Science Education, Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Engineering Education Program Office, National Academy of Engineering and Teacher Advisory Council, Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Engineering Education Program Office, National Academy of Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  79. National Science Foundation. (2010). Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  80. Navarro, R. L., Flores, L. Y., & Worthington, R. L. (2007). Mexican American middle school students’ goal intentions in mathematics and science: A test of social cognitive career theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(3), 320–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: Vol. 2. A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  82. Patrick, L., Care, E., & Ainley, M. (2011). The relationship between vocational interests, self-efficacy and achievement in the prediction of educational pathways. Journal of Career Assessment, 19(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Perna, L., Lundy-Wagner, V., Drezner, N. D., Gasman, M., Yoon, S., Bose, E., et al. (2009). The contribution HBCUS to the preparation of African American women for STEM careers: A case study. Research in Higher Education, 50(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pike, G. R. (2006). Students’ personality types, intended majors, and college expectations: Further evidence concerning psychological and sociological interpretations of Holland’s theory. Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 801–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2006). College major choice: An analysis of person–environment fit. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Riegle-Crumb, C., & King, B. (2010). Questioning a White male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rogers, M. E., & Creed, P. A. (2011). A longitudinal examination of adolescent career planning and exploration using a social cognitive career theory framework. Journal of Adolescence, 34(1), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Roksa, J., & Keith, B. (2008). Credits, time, and attainment: Articulation policies and success after transfer. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 236–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rosenbaum, J. (2001). College for all. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  90. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rubin, D. B. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of American Statistical Association, 91(434), 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  95. Schunk, D. H., & Miller, S. D. (2002). Self-efficacy and adolescents’ motivation. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 29–52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  96. Scott, A. B., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2005). Parental emotional support, science self-efficacy, and choice of science major in undergraduate women. The Career Development Quarterly, 53(3), 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Seymour, E. (1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education, 79(4), 437–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Smart, J. C., Feldman, K. A., & Ethington, C. A. (2000). Academic disciplines: Holland’s theory and the study of college students and faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Smyth, F. L., & McArdle, J. J. (2004). Ethnic and gender differences in science graduation at selective colleges with implications for admission policy and college choice. Research in Higher Education, 45(4), 353–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Song, C., & Glick, J. E. (2004). College attendance and choice of college majors among Asian-American students. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1401–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Staniec, J. F. O. (2004). The effects of race, sex, and expected returns on the choice of college major. Eastern Economic Journal, 30(4), 549–569.Google Scholar
  102. Starobin, S. S., & Laanan, F. S. (2005). Influence of precollege experience on self-concept among community college students in science, mathematics, and engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science, 11(3), 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Starobin, S. S, & Laanan, F. S. (2008). Broadening female participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Experiences at community colleges. In J. Leaster (Ed.), New directions for community colleges (No. 142, pp. 37–46). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  104. Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1999). Students’ out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 610–622.Google Scholar
  105. Towns, M. H. (2010). Where are the women of color? Data on African American, Hispanic, and native American faculty in STEM. Journal of Science and Teaching, 39(4), 8–9.Google Scholar
  106. Townsend, B. K. (2001). Blurring the lines: Transforming terminal education to transfer education. In New directions for community colleges (No. 115, pp. 63–71). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  107. Tyson, W., Lee, R., Borman, K. M., & Hanson, M. A. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(3), 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. U.S. Department of Labor. (2007). The STEM workforce challenge: The role of the public workforce system in a national solution for a competitive science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  109. Wang, X. (2009). Baccalaureate attainment and college persistence of community college transfer students at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 570–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wang, X. (2012). Modeling student choice of STEM fields of postsecondary study: Testing a conceptual framework of motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. Retrieved from http://www.wiscape.wisc.edu/Publications/Publication.aspx?ID=bd56af78-cf50-473b-92fa-58739151f296. Retrieved 20 Mar 2012.
  111. Ware, N. C., & Lee, V. E. (1988). Sex differences in choice of college science majors. American Educational Research Journal, 25(4), 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Xu, Y. J. (2008). Gender disparity in STEM disciplines: A study of faculty attrition and turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 49(7), 607–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Leadership and Policy AnalysisUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations