Identifying the Best Buys in U.S. Higher Education
- 918 Downloads
Which U.S. institutions of higher education offer the best value to consumers? To answer this question, we evaluate U.S. institutions relative to a data envelopment analysis (DEA) multi-factor frontier based on 2000–2001 data for 1,179 4-year institutions. The resulting DEA “best buy” scores allow the ranking of institutions by a weighted sum of institutional characteristics per dollar of average net price. The net price is calculated as tuition, fees, room, and board less per student financial aid. Institutional characteristics include SAT score, athletic expenditures, instructional expenditures, value of buildings, dorm capacity, and student body characteristics. The DEA scores indicate the distance of each institution from the “best buy” frontier for the chosen characteristics, providing an objective means of ranking institutions as the best values in higher education.
KeywordsEducation Data envelopment analysis Comparative advantage
- Athanassopoulos, A., & Shalle E. (1997). An investigation on the cost and value added efficiencies of higher education institutions in the UK using data envelopment analysis. Education Economics Journal, 5(2).Google Scholar
- Avery, C., Glickman M., Hoxby C., & Metrick A. (2004). A revealed preference ranking of U.S. Colleges and Universities. NBER Working Paper No. 10803 http://smai.emath.fr/IMG/pdf_RI296_Shanghai.pdf.
- Berkelaar, M., et al. (2010). lpSolve: Interface to Lp solve v.5.5 to solve linear/integer programs. R package version 5.6.5. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lpSolve.
- Billaut, J.-C., Bouyssou, D., Vincke, P. (2009). Should you believe in the shanghai ranking? An MCDM view. http://smai.emath.fr/IMG/pdf_RI296_Shanghai.pdf. Retrieved Nov 12, 2009.
- Bivand, R., et al. (2011). spdep: Spatial dependence: Weighting schemes, statistics and models. R package version 0.5-31. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=spdep.
- Burness, J. F. (2008). The rankings game: Who’s playing whom? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(2), A80.Google Scholar
- Charnes, A., et al. (1994). Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology, and application. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (2nd ed., p. xxxviii). New York: Springer. (490).Google Scholar
- Ehrenberg, R. G. (2003). Method or Madness? Inside the USNWR College Rankings. Working paper, ILR collection, Cornell University. Available from http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043&context=workingpapers.
- Emrouznejad, A. (2008). Data envelopment analysis homepage. www.DEAzone.com. Last viewed July 8 2009.
- Field, K. (2008). A bill that took longer than a Bachelor’s Degree. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(48), 1.Google Scholar
- Glenn, D. (2007). Economists concoct new method for comparing graduation rates. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(5), 1.Google Scholar
- Henningsen, A. (2010). linprog: Linear programming/optimization. R package version 0.9-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=linprog.
- Hoxby, C. M. (Ed.). (2004). College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it. Chicago, Illinois: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (1993). Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments—an application of data envelopment analysis. Oxford Economic Papers-New Series, 45(2), 332–347.Google Scholar
- Marshall, E., & Shortle, J. (2005). Using DEA and VEA to evaluate quality of life in the Mid-Atlantic States. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 34(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
- Sarrico, C. S., Hogan, S. M., Dyson, R. G., & Athanassopoulos, A. D. (1997). Data envelopment analysis and university selection. The Journal of the Operational Research Society., 48(12), 1163–1177.Google Scholar
- Tiffany, F. G., & Ankrom, J. A. (1998). The competitive use of price discrimination by colleges. Eastern Economic Journal, 24(1), 99–110.Google Scholar
- Winston, G. C. (2003). Toward a theory of tuition: Prices, peer wages, and competition in higher education. The Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education, Discussion Paper 65.Google Scholar
- William, Y., Tooraj, J., Michael, P. (2007). “Incorporating the price of quality in efficiency analysis: the case of electricity distribution regulation in the UK.” Cambridge working papers in economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, 24 pp.Google Scholar