The Role of Living–Learning Programs in Women’s Plans to Attend Graduate School in STEM Fields
- 827 Downloads
This paper examines the role of living–learning (L/L) programs in undergraduate women’s plans to attend graduate school in STEM fields. Using data from the 2004–2007 National Study of Living Learning Programs (NSLLP), the only existing multi-institutional, longitudinal dataset examining L/L program outcomes, the findings show that women’s participation in women-only STEM-focused L/L programs is positively associated with STEM graduate school aspirations, in comparison to residing in co-educational STEM L/L programs, all other L/L programs, and traditional residence halls. Socially supportive residence hall climates and women’s self-assessments as performing better than men in STEM contexts were also positively associated with STEM graduate school plans, while academically supportive residence hall climates and visiting the work setting of a STEM professional held negative relationships with the outcome. Implications are discussed for L/L programs and the utility of women-only programming within coeducational institutions of higher education.
KeywordsWomen in STEM Living–Learning Programs Graduate school aspirations
- Adelman, C. (1991). Women at thirtysomething: Paradoxes of attainment, No. OR 91-530. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
- Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Astin, A. W., & Astin, H. S. (1992). Undergraduate science education: The impact of different college environments on the educational pipeline in the sciences. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Colbeck, C. L., Cabrera, A. F., & Terenzini, P. T. (2001). Learning professional confidence: Linking teaching practices, students’ self-perceptions, and gender. The Review of Higher Education, 24(2), 173–191.Google Scholar
- Crosby, F., Allen, B., Culbertson, T., Wally, C., Morith, J., Hall, R., et al. (1994). Taking selectivity into account, how much does gender composition matter?: A re-analysis of M. E. Tidball’s research. NWSA Journal, 6(1), 107–118.Google Scholar
- Gandhi, C. M. O. (1999). A longitudinal evaluation of factors associated with retaining women in science and engineering. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(11), 5833 (UMI No. 9950087).Google Scholar
- Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The campus climate: A chilly one for women? Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges (Report of the Project on the Status and Education of Women).Google Scholar
- Hathaway, R. S., Sharp, S., & Davis, C.-S. (2001). Programmatic efforts affect retention of women in science and engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(2), 107–124.Google Scholar
- Inkelas, & Associates. (2004). National Study of Living-Learning Programs: 2004 report of findings. Retrieved July 21, 2010, from http://www.livelearnstudy.net/images/NSLLP_2004_Final_Report.pdf.
- Inkelas, & Associates. (2008). National Study of Living-Learning Programs: 2007 report of findings. Retrieved July 21, 2010, from http://www.lib.umd.edu/drum/handle/1903/8392.
- Inkelas, K. K., Johnson, D., Lee, Z., Daver, Z. E., Longerbeam, S., Vogt, K., et al. (2006). The role of living-learning programs in students’ perceptions of intellectual growth at three large universities. NASPA Journal, 43(1), 115–143.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D., Soldner, M., & Inkelas, K. K. (2006, June). Facilitating success for women in STEM through living-learning programs. White paper prepared for the National Conference of the Women in Engineering Programs and Advocates Network, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
- Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 255–311). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Sheu, H., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B. R., Gloster, C. S., et al. (2005). Social cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering: Utility for women and students at historically Black universities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(1), 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Science Foundation. (2009). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2009, NSF 09-305. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
- Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research (Vol. 1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Pike, G. R. (1999). The effects of residential learning communities and traditional residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40(3), 269–284.Google Scholar
- Sax, L. J. (2001). Undergraduate science majors: Gender differences in who goes to graduate school. The Review of Higher Education, 24(2), 153–172.Google Scholar
- Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Tidball, M. E., Smith, D. G., Tidball, C. S., & Wolf-Wendel, L. E. (1999). Taking women seriously: Lessons and legacies for educating the majority. Phoenix, AZ: The American Council on Education and The Oryx Press.Google Scholar
- Whitt, E. J. (1994). “I can be anything!” Student leadership in three women’s colleges. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 198–207.Google Scholar
- UCLA, Academic Technology Services, Statistical Consulting Group. (n.d.). Regression with SPSS. Chapter 5: Additional coding systems for categorical variables in regression analysis. Retrieved from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/spss/webbooks/reg/chapter5/spssreg5.htm.