Accuracy of Self-reported SAT and ACT Test Scores: Implications for Research
Because it is often impractical or impossible to obtain school transcripts or records on subjects, many researchers rely on college students to accurately self-report their academic record as part of their data collection procedures. The purpose of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of student self-reported academic performance. As expected the study finds overall validity of self-reported test scores to be high. However, correlations between self-reported and actual SAT scores are significantly lower than correlations for self-reported and actual ACT Composite scores. This study also confirms prior research which found that when students are inaccurate in reporting their scores, a disproportionate number of them over-report their scores. Also consistent with other studies, this study finds that lower achieving students for both tests are much less accurate when reporting their scores.
KeywordsSelf-report accuracy Cognitive distortion Motivated distortion Higher education research SAT/ACT test scores
- Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Anaya, G. (1999). Accuracy of self-reported test scores. College & University, Fall, 13–19.Google Scholar
- Cabrera, A. F., Stampen, J. O., & Hansen, W. L. (1990). Exploring the effects of ability to pay on persistence in college. The Review of Higher Education, 13, 303–336.Google Scholar
- Cassady, J. C. (2001). Self-reported GPA and SAT: A methodological note. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 7. Retrieved April 17, 2008, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=12.
- Cohen, B. H. (2001). Explaining psychological statistics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- College Board. (2008). SAT-ACT concordance tables. Retrieved Aug 15, 2008, from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/act-sat-concordance-tables.pdf.
- Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Frucot, V. G., & Cook, G. L. (1994). Further research on the accuracy of students’ self-reported grade point averages, SAT scores, and course grades. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 743–746.Google Scholar
- Gonyea, R. M. (2005). Self-reported data in institutional research: Review and recommendations. In R. K. Toutkoushian & P. D. Umbach (Eds.), Survey research: emerging issues: Vol. 127. New directions for institutional research series (pp. 73–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Herman, W. E. (2003, August). College student awareness of current G.P.A. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American psychological association, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
- Nancarrow, C., & Brace, I. (2000). Saying the “right thing:” coping with social desirability bias in marketing research. Bristol business school teaching and research review, Summer, 3.Google Scholar
- Pearson, R. W., Ross, M., & Dawes, R. M. (1994). Personal recall and the limits of retrospective questions in surveys. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 65–94). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Takalkar, P., Waugh, G., & Micceri, T. (1993, May). A search for truth in student responses to selected survey items. Paper presented at the AIR annual forum, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. A. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar