Research in Higher Education

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 109–131 | Cite as

Will IR Staff Stick? An Exploration of Institutional Researchers’ Intention to Remain in or Leave Their Jobs



The study explored the factors that relate to the likelihood of institutional researchers (IRs) to plan to leave their jobs. Learning more about the effects on IR job turnover can serve to improve the employment experience of IR practitioners, the profession of IR, and, indirectly, higher education. 1,264 IRs responded to a national survey comprised of antecedents of intention to quit one’s job that had a high degree of construct validity within job turnover theories. Data were tested against a theoretical model developed from the Industrial-Organizational Psychology and IR literature. Perceived organizational support was the strongest predictor of intent to quit. Burnout, lack of advancement opportunities, lack of rewards and recognition, job embeddedness, and available job alternatives also affect IRs intention to quit. Suggestions for supporting IRs and elevating the role of IR on campuses are included.


Institutional research Job turnover Intention to quit Perceived organizational support Job embeddedness Job satisfaction 


  1. Albright, W., & Cluff, G. (2005). Ahead of the curve: How MITRE recruits and retains older workers. Journal of Organizational Excellence, 24(2), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resources practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 19(1), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Association of American Colleges and Universities and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. (2008). New leadership for student learning and accountability: A statement of principles, commitments to action. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from
  4. Augustine, K. (2001). Factors influencing the use of institutional research studies from the researchers’ perspective. Proquest Dissertation Abstracts No. AAT 3016793.Google Scholar
  5. Austin, A. E. (1985, March). Factors contributing to job satisfaction of university mid-level administrators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  6. Bannister, B. D., & Griffeth, R. W. (1986). Applying a causal analytic framework to the Mobley, Horner, and Hollingsworth (1978) turnover model: A useful reexamination. Journal of Management, 12, 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blau, G. (1994). Testing a two-dimensional measure of job search behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 288–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bozeman, D. P., & Perrewe, P. L. (2001). The effects of item content overlap on Organizational Commitment Questionnaire-turnover cognitions relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indices for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cotton, J. L., & Tuttle, J. M. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 11, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crossley, C. D., Bennett, R. J., Jex, S., & Burnfield, J. L. (2007). Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1031–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crossley, C. D., Grauer, E., Lin, L. F., & Stanton, J. M. (2002, April). Assessing the content validity of intention to quit scales. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Delaney, A. M. (1997). The role of institutional research in higher education: Enabling researchers to meet new challenges. Research in Higher Education, 38(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delaney, A. M. (2000, May). Institutional researchers as leaders in policy: Perspectives and possibilities. Paper presented at the 40th annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  16. Delaney, A. M. (2001, June). Institutional researchers: Challenges, resources, and opportunities. Paper presented at the 41st annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Long Beach, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Delaney, A. M. (2001b). Institutional researchers’ perceptions of effectiveness. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delaney, A. M. (2008). Typical institutional research studies on students: Perspectives and examples. In D. G. Terkla (Ed.), Institutional research: More than just data. New Directions for Higher Education (Vol. 141, pp. 57–67). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elangoven, A. R. (2001). Causal ordering of stress, satisfaction and commitment, and intention to quit: A structural equations analysis. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 11(4), 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farkas, A. J., & Tetrick, L. E. (1989). A three wave longitudinal analysis of the causal ordering of satisfaction and commitment on turnover decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 855–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fenstemacher, W. P. (1982, Summer). Institutional research director: Professional development and career path. The AIR Professional File, No. 13.Google Scholar
  24. Firth, L., Mellor, D. J., Moore, K. A., & Loquet, C. (2004). How can managers reduce employee intention to quit? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(2), 170–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frank, F. D., Finnegan, R. P., & Taylor, C. R. (2004). The race for talent: Retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century. Human Resource Planning, 27, 12–25.Google Scholar
  26. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of management, 26, 463–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrington, C., & Chen, H. Y. (1995, May). The characteristics, roles and functions of institutional research professionals in the Southern Association for Institutional Research. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Association for Institutional Research Forum, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1991). Structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 350–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1995). Employee turnover. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Hom, P. W., Griffeth, R. W., & Sellaro, L. (1984). The validity of Mobley’s (1977) model of employee turnover. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 141–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hom, P. W., Roberson, L., & Ellis, A. D. (2008). Challenging conventional wisdom about who quits: Revelations from corporate America. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria vs new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huntington, R. B., & Claggett, C. A. (1991). Increasing institutional research effectiveness and productivity: Findings from a national survey. Paper presented at the 18th annual conference of the Northeast Association for Institutional Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  34. Hurst. P. J., Matier, M. W., & Sidle, C. C. (1998). Fostering teamwork and teams from the institutional research office. In: J. F. Volkwein & S. H. Frost (Eds.), Using teams in higher education: Cultural foundations for productive change. New Directions for Institutional Research (Vol. 100, pp. 17–25). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, M. D. (1982, Spring) Career development in institutional research. The AIR Professional File, No. 12.Google Scholar
  36. Kezar, A. (2005). Editor’s notes. In A. Kezar (Ed.), Organizational learning in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education (Vol. 141, pp. 1–6). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Knight, W. E. (2003). Conclusion. In W. E. Knight (Ed.), The primer for institutional research (pp. 159–161). Tallahassee, FL: The Association for Institutional Research.Google Scholar
  38. Knight, W. E. (2010). In their own words: Effectiveness in institutional research. AIR Professional File, 115.Google Scholar
  39. Knight, W. E., Moore, M. E., & Coperthwaite, C. C. (1997). Institutional research: Knowledge, skills, and perceptions of effectiveness. Research in Higher Education, 38(4), 419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuh, G., et al. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  41. Lee, T. T., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Review, 19, 51–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leimer, C., & Terkla, D. G. (2009). Laying the foundation: IR office organization, staffing, and career development. In C. Leimer (Ed.), Imagining the future of institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Lindquist, S. B. (1999). A profile of institutional researchers from AIR national membership surveys. In: J. F. Volkwein (Ed.), What Is institutional research all about? A critical and comprehensive assessment of the profession. New Directions for Institutional Research (Vol. 104). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  45. Lohmann, D. (1998, May). Positioning institutional research as a major player in policy decisions: Problems to solve, actions to take. Paper presented at the 38th annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  46. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Mertler, A. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced multivariate statistical methods (3rd ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.Google Scholar
  49. Middaugh, M. F., Kelly, H. A., & Walters, A. M. (2008). The role of institutional research in understanding and describing faculty work. In D. G. Terkla (Ed.), Institutional research: More than just data. New Directions for Higher Education (Vol. 141, pp. 41–56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  50. Milam, J. (2005). Organizational learning through knowledge workers and infomediaries. In A. Kezar (Ed.), Organizational learning in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education (Vol. 141, pp. 61–73). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2001). The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 189–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mobley, W. H. (1982). Employee turnover: Causes consequences and control. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  55. Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. (2006). Improving student learning in higher education through better accountability and assessment. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from
  58. Parker, D. F., & DeCotiis, T. A. (1983). Organizational determinants of job stress. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Absenteeism and turnover of hospital employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  60. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rosser, V. J. (2004). A national study on midlevel leaders in higher education: The unsung professionals in the academy. Higher Education, 48, 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sanford, T. R. (1983). Coping strategies for job stress among institutional researchers. Paper presented at the 23rd annual Association for Institutional Research Forum, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar
  63. Saunders, L. E. (1983). Politics within the institution. In J. W. Firnberg & W. F Lasher (Eds.), The politics and pragmatics of institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research (Vol. 38). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  64. Sayers, K. W., & Ryan, J. F. (2009). The institutional research option: Transforming data, information, and decision making for institutions at risk. In J. Martin & J. E. Samels et al. (Eds.), Turnaround: Leading stressed colleges and universities to excellence (pp. 211–220). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Steel, R. P. (2002). Turnover theory at the empirical interface: Problems of fit and function. Academy of Management Review, 27, 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Steel, R. P., & Griffeth, R. W. (1989). The elusive relationship between perceived employment opportunity and turnover behavior: A methodological or conceptual artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 846–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Steel, R. P., & Mento, A. J. (1987). The participation-performance controversy reconsidered: Subordinate competence as a mitigating factor. Group and Organization Studies, 12, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stevens, R. (2006). Social engineering. Wall Street Journal, A12, April 19.Google Scholar
  69. Storrar, S. J. (1981). Perceptions of organizational and political environments: Results of a national survey of institutional research/planning officers at large public universities. Paper presented at the 21st annual Association for Institutional Research Forum, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  70. Tate, U., Whatley, A., & Clugston, M. (1997). Sources and outcomes of job tension: A three-nation study. International Journal of Management, 3, 350–358.Google Scholar
  71. Terenzini, P. T. (1993). On the nature of institutional research and the knowledge and skills it requires. Research in Higher Education, 34(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Terenzini, P. T. (1995, Fall/Winter). Evolution and evolution in institutional research. AIR Currents, 33(7).Google Scholar
  73. Terkla, D. G. (2008). Editor’s notes. In D. G. Terkla (Ed.), Institutional research: More than just data. New Directions for Higher Education (Vol. 141, pp. 1–3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  74. Turning boomers into boomerangs (2006, February 18–24). The Economist, 65–67.Google Scholar
  75. United States Department of Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U. S. higher education. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  76. Volkwein, J. F. (2008). The foundations and evolution of institutional research. In D. G. Terkla (Ed.), Institutional research: More than just data. New Directions for Institutional Research (Vol. 141). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  77. Volkwein, J. F. (1999, Winter). The four faces of institutional research. In J. F. Volkwein (Eds.), What is institutional research all about? A critical and comprehensive assessment of the profession. New Directions for Institutional Research (Vol. 104, pp. 9–19). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  78. Voorhees, R. A. (2008). Institutional research’s role in strategic planning. In: D. G. Terkla (Ed.), Institutional research: More than just data. New Directions for Higher Education (Vol. 141, pp. 77–85). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  79. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams, L. J., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yao, X., Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Burton, J. P., & Sablynski, C. S. (2004). Job embeddedness: Current research and future directions. In R. Griffeth & P. Hom (Eds.), Understanding employee retention and turnover (pp. 153–187). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Office of Institutional ResearchBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Institutional Research, Assessment and PlanningCalifornia State UniversityFresnoUSA

Personalised recommendations