Abstract
This paper examines student attitudes towards affirmative action over 4 years of college. Asian American and Latino/a students were more likely than White students to disagree strongly or somewhat with abolishing affirmative action after 4 years of college. A student’s attitude towards the policy as a first-year student, peer group influence, and political orientation were significant predictors of student attitudes of affirmative action during the fourth year of college. The findings suggest that while college plays some role in shaping affirmative action attitudes, its influence is somewhat limited in comparison to the background traits and attitudes that students bring to college.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aberson, C. L. (2007). Diversity experiences predict changes in attitudes toward affirmative action. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(4), 285–294.
Allen, W. R., Teranishi, R., Dinwiddie, G., & Gonzalez, G. (2000). Knocking at freedom’s door: Race, equity and affirmative action in U.S. higher education. Journal of Negro Education, 69, 3–11.
Astin, A. W. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York: Macmillan.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. W., & Denson, N. (2009). Multi-campus studies of college impact: Which statistical method is appropriate? Research in Higher Education, 50(4), 354–367.
Astin, A. W., & Lee, J. (2003). How risky are one-shot cross-sectional assessments of undergraduate students? Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 657–672.
Bobo, L., & Kluegel, J. R. (1993). Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes? American Sociological Review, 58, 443–464.
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Brief of Carnegie Mellon University and 37 Fellow Private Colleges and Universities as Amicus Curiae in support of respondent. Grutter v. Bollinger et al., No. 02-241 (2003); Gratz v. Bollinger et al. No. 02-516 (2003).
Brief of Columbia University, Cornell University, Georgetown University, Rice University and Vanderbilt University as Amicus Curiae in support of respondent. Grutter v. Bollinger et al., No. 02-241 (2003); Gratz v. Bollinger et al. No. 02-516 (2003).
Brief of Harvard University, Brown University, the University of Chicago, Dartmouth College, Duke University, the University of Pennsylvania, Princeton University, and Yale University as Amicus Curiae in support of respondent. Grutter v. Bollinger et al., No. 02-241 (2003); Gratz v. Bollinger et al. No. 02-516 (2003).
Cantor, N. (2004). Introduction. In defending diversity: Affirmative action at the University of Michigan (pp. 1–16). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Chin, G., Cho, S., Kang, J., & Wu, F. (1996). Beyond self-interest: Asian Pacific Americans towards a community of justice, a policy analysis of affirmative action. Los Angeles: Asian American Studies Center.
CNN.com. (2003, December 24). Bake sales used to protest affirmative action. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/West/12/24/affirmative.bake.sale.ap/.
Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A., & Sincharoen, S. (2006). Understanding affirmative action. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 586–611.
Dey, E. L. (1996). Undergraduate political attitudes: An examination of peer, faculty and social influences. Research in Higher Education, 37, 535–554.
Dougherty, K., Johnson, B., & Polson, E. (2007). Recovering the lost: Remeasuring U.S. religious affiliation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(4), 483–499.
Elizondo, E., & Crosby, F. (2004). Attitudes toward affirmative action as a function of the strength of ethnic identity among Latino college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(9), 1773–1796.
Emerson, M. O., & Smith, C. (2000). Divided by faith: Evangelical religion and the problem of race in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Espenshade, T. J., & Chung, C. Y. (2005). The opportunity cost of admission preferences at elite universities. Social Science Quarterly, 86(2), 293–305.
Golden, H., Hinkle, S., & Crosby, F. (2001). Reactions to affirmative action: Substance and semantics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 17–32.
Hinojosa, V., & Park, J. Z. (2004). Religion and the paradox of racial inequality attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 43, 229–238.
Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Inkelas, K. K. (2003). Caught in the middle: Understanding Asian Pacific American perspectives on affirmative action through Blumer’s group position theory. Journal of College Student Development, 44(5), 625–643.
Jacobson, C. K. (1985). Resistance to affirmative action: Self interest or racism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 306–329.
Kang, J., & Banaji, M. (2006). Fair measures: A behavioral realist revision of ‘affirmative action’. California Law Review, 94, 1063–1118.
Kidder, W. (2006). Negative action versus affirmative action: Asian Pacific Americans are still caught in the crossfire. Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 11, 605–624.
Kluegel, J., & Smith, E. R. (1983). Affirmative action attitudes: Effects of self-interest, racial affect, and stratification beliefs. Social Forces, 61(4), 787–824.
Konrad, A. M., & Linnehan, F. (1995). Race and sex differences in line managers’ reactions to equal employment opportunity and affirmative action interventions. Group and Organization Management, 20, 409–439.
Kravitz, D. A., & Klineberg, S. L. (2000). Reactions to two versions of affirmative action among Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 597–611.
Le, L., Lee, T., & Sawyer, M. Q. (2006). Is demography destiny: Stimulating the vote to repeal proposition 209? Paper presented at the Equal Opportunity in Higher Education: The Past and Future of Proposition 209, Berkeley.
McLachlan, G. J., & Krishnan, T. (1997). The EM algorithm and extensions. New York: Wiley.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sax, L. J., & Arredondo, M. (1999). Student attitudes toward affirmative action in college admissions. Research in Higher Education, 40(4), 439–459.
Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 53–84). New York: Plenum.
Sears, D. O., van Larr, C., Carrillo, M., & Kosterman, R. (1997). Is it really racism? The origins of White Americans’ opposition to race-integrated policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 16–53.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., van Laar, C., & Sears, D. O. (2008). The diversity challenge. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Skretny, J. (1996). The ironies of affirmative action. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Smith, W. A. (1998). Gender and racial/ethnic differences in the affirmative action attitudes of U.S. college students. Journal of Negro Education, 6(2), 127–141.
Sniderman, P. M., & Piazza, T. (1993). The scar of race. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Snyder, L., Cleveland, J., & Thornton, G. (2006). Support for affirmative action initiatives among diverse groups: The role of ethnic identity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 527–551.
Thomas, S. L., & Heck, R. H. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 517–540.
Umbach, P. D., & Milem, J. F. (2004). Applying Holland’s typology to the study of differences in student views about diversity. Research in Higher Education, 45(6), 625–649.
Weidman, J. C. (1989). Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. V, pp. 289–322). New York: Agathon Press.
Young, J. R. (2003, July 4). The Michigan rulings: Student activists prepare for new battles in wake of decision. Chronicle of Higher Education.
Zamani-Gallaher, E. M. (2007). The confluence of race, gender, and class among community college students: Assessing attitudes toward affirmative action in college admissions. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40, 241–251.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank M. Kevin Eagan for his helpful feedback. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2008 American Educational Research Association annual conference.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, J.J. Taking Race into Account: Charting Student Attitudes Towards Affirmative Action. Res High Educ 50, 670–690 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9138-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9138-7