Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 268–292 | Cite as

Departmental Climate and Student Experiences in Graduate Geography Programs

  • Michael Solem
  • Jenny Lee
  • Beth Schlemper
Article

Abstract

This study explores how graduate students enrolled in M.A./M.S. and Ph.D. geography programs perceive the social and academic climate of their departments. A second objective is to understand how these students self-assess their own professional abilities, values, and goals, and whether these self-assessments differ across demographic and institutional contexts. The survey instrument for this research is based on data collected from graduate student focus groups and on validated constructs of academic culture and climate from previous research. T-tests, ANOVA, and regression analyses identified significant differences among graduate students and their perceptions of departmental climate when compared on the basis of gender, citizenship, race/ethnicity, disciplinary subfield, and institutional type. Interview data provide additional context for analysis of the survey data. The primary areas in which we detected differences in graduate students’ experiences were 1) diversity issues, 2) disciplinary and institutional cultures, 3) career planning and development, 4) financial matters, and 5) quality of the learning environment. These differences result from the varying social and academic dynamics of graduate programs, illustrating the importance of the local environment in shaping student experiences.

Keywords

Graduate education Departmental climate Professional development Disciplinary culture Geography 

References

  1. Anderson, M. (1996). Collaboration, the doctoral experience, and the departmental environment. The Review of Higher Education, 19, 305–326.Google Scholar
  2. Antony, J., & Taylor, E. (2004). Theories and strategies of academic career socialization: Improving paths to the professoriate for Black graduate students. In D. Wulff & A. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 92–114). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Association of American Geographers. (2006). Guide to Geography Programs in the Americas. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialisation to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Using doctoral education to prepare faculty to work within Boyer’s four domains of scholarship. New Directions for Institutional Research, 129, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory, research (Vol. 29, pp. 481–534). New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bieber, J. P., & Worley, L. K. (2006). Conceptualising the academic life: Graduate students’ perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 1009–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members: Nihil nimus. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cameron, K. S., & Ettington, D. R. (1988). The conceptual foundations of organizational culture. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory, research (Vol. 4, pp. 356–396). New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cooper, J., & Steven, D. (Eds.). (2002). Tenure in the sacred grove: Issues and strategies for women and minority faculty. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  14. Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). (2003). Inclusiveness series. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.Google Scholar
  15. Ehrenberg, R. G., & Mavros, P. G. (1992). Do doctoral students’ financial support patterns affect their time-to-degree and completion probabilities?. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  16. Garcia, M. (Ed.). (2000). Succeeding in an academic career: A guide for faculty of color. Westport, Conn. and London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  17. Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: The Pew Charitable Trusts.Google Scholar
  18. Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2004). The survey of doctoral education and career preparation: The importance of disciplinary contexts. In D. H. Wulff & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 19–45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67–78). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International.Google Scholar
  20. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Hermanowicz, J. (2005). Classifying universities and their departments: A social world perspective. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 26–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Komaki, J. (2005). Faculty climate survey report. Boulder, CO: Office of Institutional Research at the University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  23. Kuh, G. D., & Whitt, E. J. (1988). The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, J. J. (2004). Comparing institutional relationships with academic departments: A study of five academic fields. Research in Higher Education, 45, 603–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, J. J. (2007). The shaping of the departmental culture: Measuring the relative influences of the institution and discipline. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  27. Lucas, C., & Murray, J., Jr. (2002). New faculty: A practical guide for academic beginners. New York: Palgrave Press.Google Scholar
  28. Monk, J. (2001). Valuing service. AAG Newsletter, 36, 3.Google Scholar
  29. Nerad, M., & Miller, D. S. (1996). Increasing student retention in graduate and professional programs. New directions for institutional research, 92, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nyquist, J. D., Manning, L., Wulff, D. H., Austin, A. E., Sprague, J., Fraser, P. K., Calcagno, C., & Woodford, B. (1999). On the road to becoming a professor: The graduate student experience. Change, 31(3), 18–27.Google Scholar
  31. Peterson, M. W., & Spencer, M. G. (1990). Understanding academic culture and climate. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Assessing academic climates and cultures. New Directions for Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Phillips, G., Gouran, D., Kuehn, S., & Wood, J. (Eds.). (1994). Survival in the academy. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pion, G. M. (2001). The early career progress of NRSA predoctoral trainees and fellows. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  34. Rice University (2003). Academic climate survey technical report. Accessed July 22, 2007 at: http://professor.rice.edu/images/professor/AcademicClimate.pdf.
  35. Rosser, V. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: a national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in higher education, 45, 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Solem, M. N., & Foote, K. E. (2004). Concerns, attitudes, and abilities of early career geography faculty. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 889–912.Google Scholar
  37. Toma, D. (1997). Alternative inquiry paradigms, faculty cultures, and the definition of academic lives. Journal of higher education, 68, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wulff, D. H., & Austin, A. E. (Eds.). (2004). Paths to the professoriate: strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Association of American GeographersWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Center for the Study of Higher EducationUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Geography and PlanningUniversity of ToledoToledoUSA

Personalised recommendations