Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 49, Issue 7, pp 607–624 | Cite as

Gender Disparity in STEM Disciplines: A Study of Faculty Attrition and Turnover Intentions

  • Yonghong Jade XuEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study examines the underrepresentation of women faculty in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) by comparing the intentions of attrition and turnover between genders in Research and Doctoral universities. It is found that the two genders did not differ in their intentions to depart from academia, but women faculty had a significantly higher likelihood to change positions within academia. The indications are that women and men are equally committed to their academic careers in STEM; nonetheless, women’s stronger turnover intentions are highly correlated with dissatisfaction with research support, advancement opportunities, and free expression of ideas. The findings suggest that the underrepresentation of women is more convincingly explained by an academic culture that provides women fewer opportunities, limited support, and inequity in leadership, rather than by gender-based differences such as roles in family responsibilities. Changes in academic STEM culture are needed in order to attract more women scientists and narrow the current gender gap.

Keywords

Faculty turnover Gender disparity Women faculty Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) 

References

  1. Ambrose, S., Huston, T., & Norman, M. (2005). A qualitative method for assessing faculty satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 803–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Council on Education (ACE), Commission on Women in Higher Education. (1988). Education the majority: Women challenge tradition in higher education. Washington, DC: ACE.Google Scholar
  3. August, L., & Waltman, J. (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, L. A. (1995). U. S. women in science and engineering, 1960–1990: Progress toward equity? Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbezat, D. A. (1992). The market for new Ph. D. economists. Journal of Economic Education, Summer, 262–275.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, L. L. B., Agago, M. O., & Coombs, W. T. (1998). Effects of job-related stress on faculty intention to leave academia. Research in Higher Education, 39(4), 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, W. E., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2003). Measuring gender bias in the salaries of tenured faculty members. New Directions for Institutional Research, 117, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bellas, M. L., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). Family time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race, and family effects. Review of Higher Education, 22(4), 367–390.Google Scholar
  10. Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Sciences, 11, 474–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bentley, J. T., & Adamson, R. (2003). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review. Special report (NSF 00-327). National Science Foundation, & Mathtech, Inc. Arlington, VA: NSF.Google Scholar
  13. Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Braxton J. M., & Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 1–46). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Bronstein, P., & Farnsworth, L. (1998). Gender differences in Faculty experiences of interpersonal climate and processes for advancement. Research in Higher Education, 39(5), 557–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chesler, M. A., & Chesler, N. C. (2002). Gender-informed mentoring strategies for women engineering scholars: On establishing a caring community. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 49–55.Google Scholar
  17. Creamer, E. G. (1998). Assessing faculty publication productivity: Issues of equity. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Vol. 26, No. 2). Washington, DC: The George Washington University: Graduate School of Education and Human Development.Google Scholar
  18. Daly, C., & Dee, J. R. (2006). Greener pastures: Faculty turnover intent in urban public universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 776–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehrenberg, R., Kasper, H., & Rees, D. (1990). Faculty turnover at American colleges and universities: Analyses of AAUP data. Economics of Education Review, 10(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frehill, L., Javurek-Humig, A., & Jeser-Cannavale, C. (2006). Women in Engineering: A review of the 2005 literature. Magazine of the Society of Women Engineering, 52(3), 34–63.Google Scholar
  21. Gander, J. P. (1999). Faculty gender effects on academic research and teaching. Research in Higher Education, 40(2), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W, & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderators tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hagedorn, L. S. (1996). Wage equity and female job satisfaction: The role of wage differentials in a job satisfaction causal model. Research in Higher Education, 37(5), 569–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagedorn, L. S. (2001). Gender differences in faculty productivity, satisfaction, and salary: What really separates us? ERIC Research Reports No. ED464548. Retrieved on September 24, 2006 from http://eric.ed.gov/.
  25. Johnsrud, L. K., & Heck, R. H. (1994). A University’s faculty: Identifying who will leave and who will stay. Journal for Higher Education Management, 10(1), 71–84.Google Scholar
  26. Johnsrud, L. K., Heck, R. H., & Rosser, V. J. (2000). Morale matters: administrators and their intent to leave. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 34–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kraut, A. I. (1975). Predicting turnover of employees from measured job attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution (2nd ed.). London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kulis, S., Sicotte, D., & Collins, S. (2002). More than a pipeline problem: Labor supply constraints and gender stratification across academic science disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 43(6), 657–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leslie, L. L., McClure, G. T., & Oaxaca, R. L. (1998). Women and minorities in science and engineering. A life sequence analysis. Journal of Higher Education, 69(3), 239–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malaney, G. D. (1986). Differentiation in graduate education. Research in Higher Education, 25(1), 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matier, M. W. (1990). Retaining faculty: A tale of two campuses. Research in Higher Education, 31, 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McElrath, K. (1992). Gender, career disruption, and academic rewards. Journal of Higher Education, 63, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGee, G. W., & Ford, R. C. (1987). Faculty research productivity and intention to change positions. The Review of Higher Education, 11(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  35. McKay, P. F., Avery, D. R., Tonidandel, S., Morris, M. A., Hernandaz, M., & Hebl, M. R. (2007). Racial differences in employee retention: Are diversity climate perceptions the key? Personnel Psychology, 60, 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mobley, W. H. (1982). Employee turnover: Causes, consequences, and control. Reading, MA: Adisson-Wesley.Google Scholar
  38. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF:99). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  39. National Research Council, Committee on Women in Science and Engineering. (1991). Women in science and engineering: Increasing their numbers in the 1990s. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  40. National Science Foundation. (2001). Advance: Program solicitation. Retrieved 20 Dec 2005 from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2001/nsf0169/nsf0169.htm.
  41. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA. Div. of Science Resources Statistics. (2003). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2002 (NSF-03-312 ed.). U.S., Virginia.Google Scholar
  42. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2004). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2004 (NSF 04-317). Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  43. Nelson, D., & Rogers, D. (2005). A national analysis of diversity in science and engineering faculties at research universities. University of Oklahoma, Department of Chemistry. Retrieved on 06 March 2006 from http://cheminfo.chem.ou.edu/~djn/diversity/briefings/Diversity%20Report%20Final.pdf.
  44. Nielson, J. M., Marschke, R., Sheff, E., & Rankin, P. (2005). Vital variables and gender equity in academe: Confessions from a feminist empiricist project. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 31(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nowell, A., & Hedges, L. V. (1998). Trends in gender differences in academic achievement from 1960–1994: An analysis of differences in mean, variance, and extreme scores. Sex Roles, 39, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: Why shouldn’t women’s work count? Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 46–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pell, A. N. (1996). Fixing the leaky pipeline: Women scientists in academia. Journal of Animal Science, 74, 2843–2848.Google Scholar
  48. Perna, L. W. (2001). The relationship between family responsibility and employment status among college and university faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(5), 584–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Perna, L. W. (2005). Sex differences in faculty tenure and promotion: The contribution of family ties. Research in Higher Education, 46(3), 277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pfeffer, J., & Lawler, J. (1980). Effects of job alternative, extrinsic rewards, and behavioral commitment on attitude toward the organization: A field test of the insufficient justification paradigm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rausch, D. K., Ortiz, B. P., Douthitt, R. A., & Reed, L. L. (1989). The academic revolving door: Why do women get caught? CUPA Journal, 40, 1–16.Google Scholar
  53. Rosenfeld, R. A., & Jones, J. A. (1987). Patterns and effects of geographic mobility for academic women and men. Journal of Higher Education, 58, 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rosser, V. J. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sanderson, A., Phua, V. C., & Herda, D. (1999). The American faculty poll: Final report. New York: TIAACREF. Google Scholar
  56. Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, L. S., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi, F. A. III (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. J. (2006). The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smart, J. C. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 31(5), 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smart, J. C. (1991). Gender equity in academic rank and salary. Review of Higher Education, 14(4), 511–525.Google Scholar
  60. Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1996). Career patterns of women and men in the sciences. American Scientist, 84(1), 63–71.Google Scholar
  61. Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review. American Psychologist, 60(9), 950–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 891–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Steers, R. M., & Mowday, R. T. (1981). Employee turnover and post-decision accommodation processes. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 237–249). Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  64. Summers, L. (2005). Remarks at NBER conference on diversifying the science and engineering workforce. Retrieved on 24 April 2006 from http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/2005/nber.html.
  65. Thomas, S. L., & Heck, R. H. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 517–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Toutkoushian, R. K. (1998). A summary of two studies on pay disparities by race and gender: Evidence from the 1998 and 1993 NCES surveys. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research. Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  67. Toutkoushian, R. K., & Conely, V., Martin. (2005). Progress for women in academe, yet inequities persist: Evidence from NSOPF:99. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Umbach, P. D. (2007). Gender equity in the academic labor market: An analysis of academic disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 48(2), 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Valian, V. (2005). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20(3), 198–213.Google Scholar
  70. Weiler, W. C. (1985). Why do faculty members leave the university? Research in Higher Education, 23(3), 270–277. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. (2003). Women in science. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  72. Xu, Y. (2008). Faculty turnover: Discipline-specific attention is warranted. Research in Higher Education, 49(1), 40–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhou, Y., & Volkwein, J. F. (2004). Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus nontenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF:99. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 139–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Counseling, Educational Psychology, and ResearchThe University of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations